HE LOST! Trump folds again in trade war, Nobel economist breakdown
By MSNBC
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Trump's Trade War: A Lost Cause**: Paul Krugman argues that the US has already lost the trade war because China's leverage, particularly regarding rare earths, was a bigger threat than US tariffs were to China. Trump backed down, trading leverage for soybean purchases. [00:36], [01:04] - **China Held Stronger Cards**: Krugman explains that China could find alternative sources for goods when facing US market access loss, while the US struggled to replicate strategic industries like rare earths. This put the US in a weaker negotiating position from the start. [01:48], [02:01] - **Tariffs: A Tax, Not a Triumph**: Krugman refutes the claim that tariffs are a policy triumph, stating they are essentially a national sales tax that raises revenue. This revenue is borne by American consumers and businesses, not primarily by foreign entities as suggested. [04:06], [04:43] - **AI Sector Echoes Dot-Com Bubble**: Krugman draws parallels between the current AI boom and the dot-com bubble, noting the massive investment in infrastructure like NVIDIA chips. He expresses concern that justifying current valuations is difficult, reminiscent of the 1999 tech market. [06:10], [07:05] - **AI's Profitability Uncertain**: While NVIDIA sells the 'picks and shovels' for AI, Krugman points out there's little evidence people will pay significantly for AI itself. He questions how the technology will eventually generate enough revenue to justify current market valuations. [06:21], [06:33]
Topics Covered
- America Lost the Trade War Due to Strategic Blunders
- Tariffs are a Tax on Americans, Not a Policy Triumph
- Is the AI Market a New Dot-Com Bubble?
Full Transcript
>> WE WILL HAVE A CRASH, AND WE
MAY LOSE A TRADE WAR THAT'S
ALREADY LOST. ACCORDING TO SOME,
PAUL KRUGMAN IS A NOBEL WINNING
ECONOMIST, LONG TIME AUTHOR OF
TEXTBOOKS, NEW YORK TIMES
COLUMNS, AND NOW THE PAUL
KRUGMAN SUBSTACK, WHERE HE HAS
CONFRONTED THIS SECOND TERM
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WITH
CLARITY AND CANDOR. THE LATEST
PIECE, HOW WE LOST THE TRADE
WAR. WELCOME BACK, PROFESSOR.
YOU'RE BETTER AT THE COMPLEX
ECONOMICS. I, AS YOU KNOW, CAN
READ. SO I NOTICE THAT IT SAYS
LOST, NOT LOSING. LET'S START
THERE. WHY IS THIS, IN YOUR
VIEW, FACTUALLY ALREADY LOST?
>> OKAY. THINK OF THIS AS A
CONTEST OF OF.
>> OF WILLS.
>> CONTEST OF LEVERAGE. UNITED
STATES VERSUS CHINA. WHO WHO
WAS WHO BACKED DOWN.
>> REALLY.
>> AND THE ANSWER IS AMERICA
BACKED DOWN OR TRUMP BACKED
DOWN BECAUSE IT TURNED OUT THAT,
YEAH, THE TRUMP TARIFFS WERE.
>> A PROBLEM.
>> FOR CHINA.
>> BUT CHINA.
>> CUTTING OFF.
>> OUR ACCESS.
>> TO.
>> RARE EARTHS WAS. A BIGGER
DEAL.
>> AND ALSO THE CHINESE KIND OF
HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT THEY WANT.
AND IT'S KIND OF.
>> YOU.
>> KNOW.
>> UNDER BIDEN, LOTS OF
CRITICISM.
>> BUT WE WERE PRETTY.
>> SERIOUS ABOUT.
>> CONFRONTING CHINA, TRYING TO
DENY THEM THE MOST ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY. TRUMP IS APPARENTLY.
GOING TO.
>> LET THEM BUY.
>> ADVANCED CHIPS, AND IN
RETURN, THEY SAY THEY'RE GOING
TO BUY SOME SOYBEANS.
>> SO WE HAVE TRADED.
>> OUR REPUTATION, OUR OUR.
>> OUR LEVERAGE IN.
>> THE WORLD AND POSSIBLY THE
FUTURE. OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL
RACE.
>> FOR A HILL.
>> OF BEANS.
>> YEAH, HILL OF BEANS. DID
CHINA HAVE BETTER CARDS OR IS
TRUMP BAD AT PLAYING THIS CARD
GAME?
>> WELL, CHINA DID HAVE BETTER
CARDS. THE FACT OF THE MATTER
WHICH TRUMP SHOULD HAVE
UNDERSTOOD, YOU KNOW. SOMEBODY
SHOULD HAVE UNDERSTOOD, WHICH
IS THAT, LOOK, LOSING THE US.
SOME ACCESS TO THE US MARKET IS
HARD. BUT THERE ARE THE CHINESE
CAN TURN TO OTHER SOURCES,
CONJURING UP A STRATEGIC
INDUSTRY LIKE. RARE EARTHS.
>> FROM A.
>> STANDING START.
>> IS NOT SOMETHING YOU.
>> CAN DO RIGHT AWAY. SO WE
ENTERED THIS IN A WEAK POSITION.
>> BUT ALSO.
>> THERE WAS JUST NO CLARITY.
AND TRUMP DIDN'T NEVER HAD A
CLEAR A CLEAR. GOAL IN THESE
TARIFFS. AND ONE OF.
>> THE BIG STRENGTHS OF THE
UNITED.
>> STATES HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT
WE HAVE ALLIES THAT ARE WE WERE
THE.
>> LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD.
>> AND IN.
>> A VERY REAL SENSE.
>> BUT WE HAVE NOW ALIENATED.
>> I GUESS.
>> TECHNICAL TERM IS OFF.
EVERYBODY WHO SHOULD BE ON OUR
SIDE HERE. I MEAN, AS ALL OF
THIS WAS GOING ON, TRUMP WAS
SLAPPING TARIFFS ON CANADA
BECAUSE THE CANADIAN PROVINCE
OF ONTARIO RAN A TV AD THAT
MADE HIM FEEL BAD. I MEAN,
WE'VE.
>> REALLY.
>> LOST OUR CREDIBILITY ON THE
WORLD STAGE COMPLETELY OVER
THIS.
>> YEAH. IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE
SAYING HE HE WAS VERY EMOTIONAL,
WHICH IS NO WAY TO LEAD. WE'RE
TOLD. I WANT TO SHOW YOU WHAT
THE TRUMP OFFICIALS ARE SAYING.
AND, PROFESSOR, AS YOU KNOW, WE
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE HERE AND WE
FACT CHECK AND WE HAVE A LOT OF
PEOPLE ON. SO IN THIS SECOND
TERM, WHICH WHICH HAS BEEN
ROCKY FOR THE REASONS YOU
MENTIONED, AMONG OTHERS, I'VE
HAD SEVERAL TRUMP OFFICIALS ON
THIS IS PETER NAVARRO, WHO'S
THE WHITE HOUSE TRADE OFFICIAL,
AND HE SAID ON THIS PROGRAM
THAT THERE IS REVENUE FROM THE
TARIFFS THAT THEY'VE BEEN DOING.
I WANT TO PLAY THIS FOR YOU AND
HAVE YOU WALK US THROUGH THE
ACTUAL ECONOMIC DATA AND FACTS.
TAKE A LOOK.
>> AT THE.
>> BEAUTIFUL THINGS THAT WE'VE
LEARNED ABOUT TARIFFS IS. THEY
ACTUALLY RAISE SUBSTANTIAL
REVENUES.
>> AND WE'RE.
>> TURNING WHAT LOOKED.
>> LIKE TO BE A FISCAL CLIFF.
AND A DEFICIT.
>> THAT WAS GOING TO GO.
>> OUT OF CONTROL.
>> INTO SOMETHING WE'RE.
>> GOING TO BE.
>> ABLE TO PAY DOWN TO THE TWO
AND THREE AND.
>> 4,000,000,000 TRILLION.
>> SO YOU FEEL. LIKE YOU FEEL
LIKE THIS IS WORKING FOR THE US,
EVEN THOUGH YOU DIDN'T GET ALL
THE DEALS THAT YOU VOWED. I
MEAN, WE DON'T HAVE 90 DEALS.
>> WELL, WAIT A MINUTE.
>> I THINK.
>> WE'VE DONE.
>> BEAUTIFULLY, PROFESSOR.
>> OKAY. TARIFF IS A TAX. TAXES
RAISE REVENUE. BIG SURPRISE.
YOU KNOW, INCREDIBLE
ACCOMPLISHMENT. IF, YOU KNOW,
IF SOMEONE, SOME PRESIDENT
IMPOSED A NATIONAL SALES TAX
AND IT RAISED SOME REVENUE,
WOULD REPUBLICANS BE
PRONOUNCING THAT AS A POLICY
TRIUMPH? AND THAT'S BASICALLY
WHAT THIS IS. IT'S A NATIONAL
SALES TAX JUST ON A SELECTED
SET OF GOODS, WHICH ARE ONES WE
HAVE TO BUY FROM ABROAD. WE
KNOW THAT FOREIGNERS HAVEN'T
PAID THE TARIFFS BECAUSE WE CAN
LOOK AT THE PRICES THAT
FOREIGNERS ARE CHARGING.
>> IT'S READILY AVAILABLE.
>> SERIES OF, YOU KNOW. IMPORT
PRICES AND IT HAS NOT GONE DOWN.
FOREIGNERS HAVE NOT CUT PRICES
TO OFFSET THE TARIFFS. SO ALL
OF THIS IS BEING BORNE PARTLY.
>> BY AMERICAN CONSUMERS.
>> PARTLY BY AMERICAN
BUSINESSES, WHICH HAVE.
>> ABSORBED SOME.
>> OF THE TARIFFS, ALTHOUGH
THAT WON'T GO ON FOR VERY LONG
BECAUSE THEY CAN'T AFFORD TO.
THIS IS, YOU KNOW, THE IDEA
THAT THERE'S SOME MAGICAL THING
THAT SAYING WE RAISE TAXES AND
WE GOT SOME REVENUE OUT OF IT,
AS IF THAT WAS A VICTORY.
>> ON THE WORLD.
>> STAGE. AND, YOU KNOW, IT
WOULD BE FUNNY, EXCEPT THAT
THESE ARE THE PEOPLE ACTUALLY
RUNNING THE COUNTRY.
>> YEAH. AND YOU MAKE THE POINT,
CLEARLY TURNING AWAY FROM
GOVERNMENT POLICY AND EVEN THE
POLITICS JUST GENERALLY AI HAS
BECOME A GIANT PART OF THE
EXPECTATIONS ON WALL STREET.
THE AI CHIPS WHICH POWER ALL
THESE THINGS, CHATGPT AND OTHER
PROGRAMS PEOPLE ARE FAMILIAR
WITH ARE PRODUCED BY ONE OF THE
BIG COMPANIES, NVIDIA, WHICH IS
THE FIRST COMPANY IN WORLD
HISTORY TO REACH $5 TRILLION. I
MEAN, IT'S HARD TO EVEN
UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS TO
MOST OF US. $5 TRILLION ON THE
ACTUAL STOCKS. ARE THEY IS IT
POSSIBLE TO SAY THAT THEY ARE
OVERVALUED? ARE YOU CONCERNED?
NICE CAT THERE. ARE YOU
CONCERNED? WALK US THROUGH HOW
YOU THINK ABOUT THIS. JUST IN
THE DOLLARS AND CENTS OF WHAT'S
HAPPENING IN THESE TOP TECH
STOCKS THAT ARE DRIVING MOST OF
THE CURRENT GAINS ACROSS THE
WHOLE MARKET.
>> OKAY. THE WAY I THINK OF
NVIDIA IS, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A
GOLD RUSH ON AND THEY ARE
BASICALLY SELLING PICKS AND
SHOVELS TO THE GOLD MINERS.
THEY'RE NOT THEY'RE NOT
ACTUALLY SELLING AI. THEY'RE
SELLING THE GEAR THAT YOU USE
TO PRODUCE AI. AND WHICH IS A
LITTLE.
>> BIT BETTER.
>> THAT THE FACT OF THE MATTER,
WE HAVE SEEN VERY LITTLE
EVIDENCE THAT THAT PEOPLE ARE
WILLING TO PAY A LOT FOR AI,
THE TECHNOLOGY, THERE'S A LOT
OF, YOU KNOW, NOBODY KNOWS JUST
HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO DO. BUT
SO FAR, IT'S KIND OF HARD TO
SEE HOW THIS ENDS UP PRODUCING
REMOTELY ENOUGH REVENUE. NOW
THAT EVENTUALLY BLOWS BACK. YOU
KNOW, NVIDIA CHIPS WON'T BE
WORTH AS MUCH IF PEOPLE DECIDE,
OOPS, WE'VE BEEN BUILDING TOO
MANY DATA CENTERS. SO, YOU KNOW,
WE DON'T KNOW THAT. YOU KNOW,
IT'S ALWAYS, ALMOST ALWAYS
IMPOSSIBLE TO BE SURE THAT
SOMETHING IS A BUBBLE HOUSING
BUBBLE OR IS OBVIOUSLY A BUBBLE.
BUT AND THE.COM BUBBLE, THIS
ONE. IS A. LITTLE MORE
COMPLICATED. BUT THERE'S
DEFINITELY, YOU KNOW, I'VE BEEN
AROUND FOR A WHILE AND THERE IS
1999 VIBES HERE. CLEAR SENSE
THAT WE HAVE A GENUINELY
IMPRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY. BUT IT'S
REALLY HARD TO SEE HOW THIS
JUSTIFIES. THE VALUATIONS COULD
BE WRONG. BUT THAT'S.
>> I KNOW YOU A LITTLE BIT,
PROFESSOR. SO YOU'RE NOT
TALKING ABOUT PRINCE PARTY LIKE
IT'S 99. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT
99 PRE-CRASH VIBE.
>> YEAH I'M TALKING ABOUT QUEST
RIDE THE LIGHT AND AND AND YOU
KNOW, PETS.COM AND ALL THAT.
BUT THE REALLY BIG STUFF WAS
THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMPANIES, WHICH LIKE THE, LIKE
THE, THE AI SECTOR NOW WERE
POURING HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY
INTO INFRASTRUCTURE TO USE THIS
WONDERFUL NEW TECHNOLOGY, THE
INTERNET, WHICH WAS IN FACT A
WONDERFUL NEW TECHNOLOGY. BUT
MOST OF THEM WENT BUST.
>> YEAH.
>> BECAUSE IT'S IT WAS A GREAT
TECHNOLOGY, BUT THE PROFITS
TOOK YEARS TO MATERIALIZE AND
OTHER COMPANIES ENDED UP MAKING
A LOT OF MONEY OFF IT. AND THIS
AND IT IS SCARY JUST HOW MUCH I
MEAN, DEPENDING UPON EXACTLY
HOW YOU CUT THE NUMBERS. BUT
BASICALLY THE US ECONOMY WOULD
BE CERTAINLY BORDERLINE
Loading video analysis...