how to read critically in the age of bad media literacy
By The Book Leo
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Critical reading is fun, not a chore.**: Engaging critically with books is not inherently difficult or boring; it's like fully immersing yourself in a lake on a hot day, offering a richer and more enjoyable experience than just dipping a toe in. [01:06], [01:45] - **Read any book critically, not just classics.**: Critical reading isn't about the genre or prestige of a book, but how you engage with it. You can apply critical analysis to any book, including popular fiction, rather than feeling pressured to read only classics. [05:36], [06:28] - **Be aware of your personal lens.**: Recognize your own subjectivity by understanding your preferences and biases. Consider how others, like your dad or a friend, might perceive the book differently to gain a more balanced perspective. [11:29], [12:52] - **Ask standard questions while reading.**: Engage with the text by asking questions like 'What is the author trying to say?' and 'Does what happens in the book fit the message?' This helps uncover the author's intent and potential contradictions. [17:23], [18:05] - **Focus on form and feeling, not just meaning.**: While finding meaning is important, don't solely focus on uncovering hidden interpretations. Appreciate the book's form, aesthetic, and how the writing makes you feel, recognizing that sometimes the curtains are just blue. [24:08], [25:44] - **Check sources and agendas for media literacy.**: To increase media literacy, always question the source of information and consider what the publisher or creator gains from sharing it. Be mindful of emotional responses, as they can be manipulated. [30:46], [32:25]
Topics Covered
- Why is critical thinking a national crisis?
- How you read, not what you read, defines critical thinking.
- Why quantity-focused reading goals sabotage deep engagement.
- Use personal and critical lenses for deeper book analysis.
- Question sources and emotional triggers for true media literacy.
Full Transcript
We need better media literacy in this
country.
>> Majority of the population lacks
critical thinking skills.
>> Don't have reading comprehension skills.
>> Turns out none of you guys can read.
>> Jenzie can't read.
>> The elite college students who can't
read books.
>> I lost the ability to read.
>> I know y'all scam when you read.
Reading that are like I just read to
turn my brain off. I don't think
critically about what I read. and any
form of literary discussion is moving
away from deep analysis. Now we've got a
media literacy crisis.
[Music]
Okay, but why should you want to read
critically? I think my main reason might
be a controversial one, but it's
actually just because it's fun. Many
people have this idea that reading
critically is hard or boring. Maybe you
don't even read at all because you're
kind of intimidated by it. But here's
the thing. Imagine that it is a hot,
sweltering summer day and you have the
choice between either dipping your toe
in a lake or just completely waiting in
the cooling water, making waves, playing
mermaids.
Which one would you choose? Reading
critically is like completely submersing
yourself in that lake. It is just the
better experience. You get so much more
out of the story. Maybe you're thinking,
"No, Leo, it's just too hard for me.
Like, I probably can't do that." No,
stop thinking that. You can. Okay, big
tech would love for you to believe that
you cannot think critically and that you
just want to turn your brain off and
doom scroll the whole day. Okay, there
are many people out there that would
love for you to believe that you have
nothing interesting to say, but today
I'm going to show you that engaging
critically with the books that you read
is actually fun and easy to do. We're
going to make sure together that you get
the most out of the books that you read
and just let it be your escape of the
crazy internet.
And now I'm going to get out of this
forest before someone sees me and looks
at me awkwardly.
Yeah, wearing my artsy oversized shirt
to really show you that I'm an
intellectual. Hello everyone. My name is
Leani. As of this month, I've been
making book reviews on the internet for
10 years.
That's a very long time. And I want to
share my thoughts and insights. So, I'm
going to share with you five steps
towards reading critically. And then at
the end I will also give you some
general media literacy tips because of
course this is all part of like a wider
conversation about the need for media
literacy also on the internet or for
articles that you read or for films that
you watch. I am not an English major or
a literature major at all. Also, I'm
sure that there are very specific
academically approved rules to
approaching media analysis and
literature comparison, and that is not
what I can share with you. But like I
said, I want to keep this video
approachable. I just want to share what
I do so you can kind of mix and match it
and fit it to your own style and what
you like to do. Because again, the whole
point of this in the end is to make your
enjoyment, your experience of reading a
little bit richer. But before we get
comfortable with more critical reading,
let's get comfortable on your feet
because this video is sponsored by
Bombas. Bombas make incredibly
comfortable socks. Their socks have
built-in arch support. The material
feels very natural and their socks have
no annoying seams, which I really like.
And I've been living in their socks
because my feet can really tell the
difference in quality. But what I am the
most fan of is their dressy socks. I
don't think an outfit is truly complete
without a cute, frilly, or patterned
sock to just really add that final
pizzazz. They also have sports ankle
socks which are incredibly comfortable
in my running shoes. But the cool thing
about Bombas is that every time you
purchase from them, they also give an
item back to a homeless shelter because
apparently socks is one of the most
needed items of clothing there. In
total, Bombas have donated over 150
million items to people who need them.
And hey, if you lose a sock, you can
always make a free exchange or return,
even if it's just your washing machine
that ate another sock up. There's a 100%
happiness guarantee with Bombas. And
they ship internationally to over 200
countries. Feel good and do good with
Bombas knowing that your purchase is
going to do some real good. And if
you're a new customer, you can get a 20%
discount if you use my code the book Leo
at checkout. So go to bombas.com/thebook
Leo to get your own pair of comfy and
very cute socks. Okay, the first of the
five steps is actually step zero and
that is that critical reading is not
about the type of books you read. It is
about how you read them. talking about
reading critically and like the lack of
critical reading in media literacy is
very trendy on the internet right now on
Tik Tok on YouTube but I'm kind of
sensing this vibe that when people are
kind of trying to combat this they do it
in the style of like oh you want to read
more critically read these books and
then it's not like books about critical
reading but just like standard classics
like oh you should start with you know
the classic ones that I keep talking
about all the time it's always kimu or
dustki that they recommend. It's always
like here start with these classic books
so you can read more critically but that
you know read being critical for a
second and that's a fallacy. Reading
critically is something you can do to
any book that you read. Picking up a
book just because it makes you seem more
intellectual and critical will probably
even put you more at the risk of not
reading it critically at all because
you're just reading it for the expected
end result of having read the book
instead of actually engaging with the
book and the story itself. So that is my
step zero is to pick up any book that
you like, literally anything, and you
can start implementing the rest of the
steps that I'm going to give you. I'm
even going to allow Colleen Hoover here.
Okay. And I just really wanted to
emphasize that because I think if you
consume a lot of content about like
brain rot and the lack of critical
reading, you really start to think that
this is somehow your own fault. Like
there's something wrong with your brain.
It has rotted away. You're not reading
the right type of books. But I do think
it's important to I guess give a little
bit grace to yourself and to other
people that often there are like
societal failures that have led to this
point like educational failures where
people have not learned the right tools
to read more critically or think more
critically. There's a lack of source
transparency on the internet.
Information is going so fast nowadays.
You have no time to process anything.
Everyone is busy and overwhelmed all the
time. So, it can be hard to find the
energy to actually read a book. No need
to shame yourself. Let's all focus on
the fact that reading freely is going to
enrich your life. It's going to be fun.
It's not some kind of homework
assignment or something you just shame
yourself into because your brain has
rotten away. No, we are going to have
fun here. Okay. So, you got your book,
your book that you're going to think
you're going to enjoy reading. Um, and
let's move on to the actual steps. Let's
start with step one to critical reading
and that is slow down. Why am I saying
slow down? Because actually I want you
to process what you're reading. Reading
critically in many ways is kind of the
antithesis to what reading has kind of
become on the internet. And that is
something that has a lot to do with
numbers. something that is very focused
on how many books you can read in a
year, how fast you can read. But that
should not be the end goal. The goal
should obviously be reading itself. It's
not about having read a book. It's about
reading a book. I'm not saying it's not
possible to read critically if you read
fast. I know a lot of people who are
very critical readers and they just
happen to read super fast and they read
hundreds of books every year. I'm not
one of those people, but I know that
those people exist. What I'm trying to
say that if you you yes watching this
video right now are on book talk a lot
or book a lot and you see a lot of these
people reading a ton of books it may
become very easy to think that that is
like the end goal that is the signifier
of being a good reader a critical reader
that you read a ton slow down okay that
is not the goal the goal here is to
actually process what you're reading
when you're reading it's not about
getting all those pages in sometimes s
you just read and then you kind of sit
and think. It's one of the main reasons
that I read so slowly is because when
I'm reading, I get constantly distracted
by my own thoughts because I'm reading
something and it makes me think of
something and then I start thinking
about it and then before I know it, I've
just been staring into space for a good
5 minutes thinking about what I've been
reading, which I actually like because
it it means I'm engaging with the book
itself. Don't try to focus too much on
reading goals. Again, I'm not against
the reading goal. I'm not against people
who read really fast. If the reading
goal helps you to pick up a book when
you're not reading, that is great. But
if a reading goal is kind of causing you
to mostly pick up short books or easier
to read books or avoiding certain books
because you know they're not going to
help you quickly go towards that reading
goal, then you need to start taking a
step back and reconsider what you're
doing. One of the main reason people
nowaday are not processing what they're
reading or consuming in general is
because we are just consuming so much
information, so much data all day, every
day, all the time. It is absolutely
impossible for your brain to process all
of that. So if you want to actually
process what you are reading, you need
to be intentional with it. You need to
slow down and not let it get gobbled up
in the sea of all the things that you
are consuming in the day. One of the
greatest ways to slow down when you're
reading is to actually make annotations.
And I could make an entire video about
how I annotate my books and that is
exactly what I will be doing. So look
forward to that. I am going to make an
entire video dedicated to slowing down
by reading and making annotations. Step
two to critical reading is be aware of
your own subjectivity. I think a lot of
people who get into reading critically
forget this because they think if I'm
reading critically then I am the
objective person. I'm the objective
opinion about all books everywhere. You
are not. A book can mean something
different to different people and that
is what is so great about them. Yes,
there are some more objective ways that
you can look at a book and there are
more subjective ways. So, how are you
going to differentiate between them? I
have a few tips. First, you must
establish what your subjective opinion
actually is. What do you like? What are
your faves? For example, when I'm
reading a book, I am very aware of the
fact that I just really enjoy
fantastical elements. I really enjoy a
dark, creepy vibe. As soon as a book has
atmosphere like that, I am way more
likely to enjoy it. I know very like
weirdly specifically I like it when
books contain themes of mist
or cannibalism or mushrooms. That's
super random, but I know that those
things are more likely to make me enjoy
a book. And I'm aware of that and I know
that that is very specific to me.
Another simple trick to become more
aware of your subjectivity is to just
ask yourself, would my dad like this
book? Would my sister like this book?
Would my high school English teacher
enjoy this book? It helps you kind of
step away from your own thoughts and
think about what other people might
enjoy or not enjoy about the same book.
For example, you may know like, oh, I
really didn't like this book because it
was just super plot focused, but I have
this friend who really loves plotbased
stories with more action and a little
less character focused, so I think she
would probably really enjoy this book.
Okay, so your opinion is subjective.
Does that mean you can just never have
an opinion about anything ever or that
there's no way to be critical about a
book ever? No, of course not. I would
personally translate it to three
different lenses that you can use to
look at a book. The personal lens, the
critical lens, and the cultural
contextual lens. The personal lens
speaks for itself. How do I feel when
I'm reading this book? What do I like
about this book? Does it have any tropes
or genres that I personally just really
enjoy or really hate? I think that is
this lens that is very prominent on book
talk and just general uh book reviewing
on the internet. Then we have the
critical lens where you go a little bit
more objective, not actually objective,
but you go a little bit more into the
technicalities of the writing. Maybe the
personal lens really loved the book, but
the critical lens can say, "Okay, but
was it actually that good?" When I read
Fourth Wing, my personal lens said,
"That was incredibly fun. I had a great
time." But my critical lens said, "Okay,
but all of the side characters were
formulaic. They didn't have any layers.
The world building didn't have any
layers. That is the critical lens. It is
asking yourself, what is the goal of
this book? And did it succeed at that
goal? Were these characters
well-developed? Did the author actually
show any good craftsmanship in their
writing? I think that is this lens that
is mostly associated with traditional
book criticism and book reviewing. But
in my personal opinion, I think the
personal and the critical lens, they
always go together. You can't really
separate them. You're always going to be
influenced by your personal biases and
your personal taste. And then the third
lens I personally think is the most fun
cuz I think it sparks the most
conversation and that is the cultural
contextual lens. How does this book fit
into the broader genre? For example,
Babel by RF Kuang is a dark academia
novel that is very clearly kind of a
response to typical dark academia novels
like The Secret History. How does this
book fit into the cultural context? For
example, romance novels tend to
perpetuate a certain view on gender
roles. Why and how did I hear about this
book? For example, if you're reading
Colleen Hoover, you might think about
like, oh, why is she so popular on Tik
Tok specifically? You may know that
she's a controversial figure. Why is
that? Do I see that back in her books or
not? Who wrote it and why? What are
their limitations? 1984 is a great
example where your critical lens might
see that this is a book criticizing
authoritarian government, but your
cultural contextual lens will take into
account that this was written in the
1940s. It's not just about some random
madeup fictional future dystopian. It
was very clearly published right after
the Second World War and during the
Soviet Union, but also it is still very
clearly published in the ' 40s because
there are some very clear misogynistic
elements to that book. And this also
kind of brings me to another reason why
it is so important to read critically. I
mentioned in the intro mostly that it's
really fun and it will enrich your
experience of the books that you read
and that is still true. But I also just
in general think that it is a good idea
to be a critical citizen of society. To
learn to read more critically and engage
critically with all media that you
assume honestly will make you less
likely to fall for propaganda. It'll
help you form your own opinions instead
of just going with whatever the status
quo is. And that is really important to
protect yourself and also the people
around you. Step three, if you're
watching this and thinking, Leoni,
you're giving me all these steps, but I
just I need more concrete examples of
what exactly I can do. Okay, step three
is to just ask questions while you're
reading. And I simply made a list of
questions that you can ask yourself
while reading a book. Um, I don't mean
that you have to like sit there with
this this list next to you. They're just
for inspiration. These are questions
that I pretty much almost automatically
always kind of ask myself when I'm
reading. First of all, very obvious,
what is the author trying to say? What
is the main message and theme? Do we see
a worldview or ideology from the author
shining through into the story? And do
you agree with that worldview? And very
importantly, a message that a book gives
does not need to be intended by the
author. Even a simple fun romance story
exists in a cultural context. You know,
a really alpha romance story may not
have the intended message of saying men
need to be manly like this and women
need to be cuty. That may not be the
author's intention, but in the broader
context of our society where most
romance novels have those two gender
roles that perfectly mirror the gender
roles that we have in society, the
romance novel may certainly underline a
certain status quo. Another thing is to
ask yourself, does what happened in the
book actually fit the message of the
book? Example, in a lot of young adult
fantasy novels from like a few years
ago, there would be this like female
empowerment message. You know, there
would be like a female warrior. The
characters would say empowering things,
but at the end of the day, the female
character consistently got saved by the
male love interest. So, the things that
are happening in the story actually
contradict the message of female
empowerment. Another example is when you
have those not like other girls
characters from the 2010s that would say
like, "Oh, I don't like girly things. I
don't like wearing makeup. I'm one of
the boys." But then there would always
be a makeover scene and they would
always end up wearing like a beautiful
princess dress that contradicts the
theme of the story. So what the author
tries to say and what the book ends up
messaging may not always align. This is
also what death of the author is. Death
of the author is one of those things
that very often gets misqued or like
misexplained on the internet. But death
of the author simply means that whatever
the author intended with their work is
dead the moment that the work comes into
the world and readers are reading it and
interpreting it. Like an author may say,
"No, these two characters are not gay.
They are straight guys." But everyone
who reads the book can clearly see the
homoerotic tension between the two
characters. And now you have a thousand
fanfictions and a huge fandom. Death of
the author. Next. How does this book fit
into the literary period? Jane Austin's
books famously critique 19th century
high society social etiquette. How does
this book fit into greater literary
patterns? Like I said, there's a clear
pattern in the gender roles in most
romance novels. Most fantasy books tend
to have a certain hero's journey, a
certain type of character that is the
main character. Fairy tale retellings
obviously all follow certain patterns.
Does the book defy a genre in certain
way? Usually, if a book can break
certain genre rules or do something
differently from what most books are
doing, that is a sign of a very original
novel. If the book gets recommended on
Tik Tok a lot, you can ask yourself why.
How does this book fit into a Tik Tok
trend or why is this book so algorithm
friendly? Ooh, another important thing.
What is the goal of the book? What is
this book actually trying to do? Don't
go hating on a romanty novel for having
too much romance in it. Don't hate a
literary fiction about kind of shitty
people for having characters that are
too unlikable. It all comes back to
differentiating between that personal
lens and that critical lens. Like, did
you not like that character because they
were flat and poorly written or did you
just dislike that character because they
reminded you of that girl in high school
that was mean to you. Sometimes a book
is just not for you and that is okay.
Does it mean that it is objectively bad
and no one should read it? Some more
kind of personal questions you can ask
yourself. Why did I like this character?
Why did I dislike that character? Are
the plot twists actually plausible? For
example, when I read Fifth Season, the
plot twists in there were amazingly
foreshadowed, and if you reread the
book, you will see all the
foreshadowing. But I've also read books
where the plot twist comes and I'm like,
this is so far-fetched. Like, I don't
believe it. What makes me want to keep
reading this book? What makes me want to
pick this book up after I've put it
down? Is it the beautiful writing style
that you love? or is it more the edge on
your seat mystery? Like for example,
personally for me, I've noticed that
what really makes a book a page turner
for me is actually if there's a romance.
Like romance is like the number one
reason for me to speed through a book
because I just want to see the romance
get resolved. So I know for me
personally, speeding through a book is
not necessarily an accurate measurement
of how good I thought the book was.
There are books that take me super long
to read that I loved, but when I speed
through a book, it usually just means
that I was really invested in the
romance. What is keeping me from giving
this book five stars? What is keeping me
from reading this book one star? Again,
for me personally, I know that a
fivestar book is purely a personal
thing. Like a book just has to have a
certain juniqua. It just needs to hit a
certain nerve in my brain. But you might
have other reasons. And lastly, what
style of writing is this? Is it quick
and simple, or is it very lyrical and
flowery? And how does that fit the book?
For example, a lot of fairy tale
retellings tend to have this kind of
flowery writing style that really
creates atmosphere. But for example,
Sally Rooney very famously doesn't use
quotation marks in her dialogue.
Personally, she says that she doesn't
see the use of them, but I think that
they also aid her story because it takes
away a kind of imminence from her
dialogue. It makes it feel a little
detached with fits the type of
characters that she writes about. Okay,
that was a very long list. I will say I
think a mistake a lot of people make is
that they think that in order to read
critically the main thing that you need
to do is just find out the hidden
meaning of the book which don't get me
wrong is an interesting thing to think
about but it's also okay to focus on
other things. I personally really agree
with Susan SG's idea on this. She writes
about in her essay against
interpretation that sometimes when you
go only digging for the meaning behind
what you're seeing, you are kind of
excavating the work of art. You are just
taking it apart too much. It's good to
not only focus on the content of a book,
but also the form, the aesthetic part of
it. How does it make you feel? How do
you like the words? How do you like the
writing? Maybe even do you like how the
book is formatted? I guess we could
compare this to like the famous the
curtains are blue discourse. I don't
want to get into it too much, but the
meme was always like, "Oh, your English
teacher says no, the curtains weren't
just blue. It was a metaphor for their
sadness." And then the memes are like,
"No, maybe the curtains were just blue."
And nowadays there's a lot of discourse
of of people saying like, "Oh, that meme
really stopped people from thinking
critically because no, maybe the
curtains weren't just blue. Maybe there
really was a reason behind that." I
would say step one of critical thinking
is to think, "No, maybe really those
curtains were a metaphor for sadness and
depression." And then step two of
critical analysis would be like, "Yeah,
well maybe indeed the curtains were just
blue. Maybe I don't want to like dig
deeper into a meaning that isn't there.
But also, the curtains are blue is kind
of a shitty sentence.
That's a not a very well-ritten sentence
right there. My gosh. Oh, I really
didn't expect this video to be this
long. Anyway, we are moving on. Step
four, which I think is maybe the most
important one, and that is how to find
meaning into the book. Because we can
talk endlessly about how to read more
critically because whatever you're going
to seem so intellectual, but in the end,
the goal here is for you to really enjoy
the book and find meaning in it. Ask
yourself, what does this book mean to
you? Does it make you think of something
in your own life after you finished the
book? What have you learned? Has it
changed your perspective on anything? A
book doesn't need to be a philosophical
masterpiece to be meaningful to you
specifically. You can find meaning in
any story. A great example for me is the
Shadow and Bone series, which I've often
talked about not finding that good
anymore, but it was the very first
fantasy book that I ever read. So, it
has a lot of meaning to me. I will
cherish it forever as being my
introduction into big magic and like
other worlds. In the end, what the story
means to you personally is worth the
most. And it's a great opener for
conversations with others. If you're not
sure how to find meaning in the book
that you're reading, talk to others
about it. Talking to other people can
help you figure out your own thoughts
and it also helps you see that other
people have different perspectives.
Bringing it back to using those
different lenses to look at a book. Now,
where to talk to people about books?
Here's a few rapidfire ideas. Join a
book club in your local town. Join a
book club online. Start a buddy read
with a friend or even watch book or book
talk videos about the book. Actually
engage with those videos. comment on
them. Maybe even start making your own
videos so you can share all your
thoughts about the books that you're
reading and find an online community.
That's literally why I started this
channel 10 years ago because I have
thoughts about the books that I was
reading and I just wanted to share them
with other people. Now that you found
your personal meaning in this book and
you can talk about it to other people,
that brings us to our last and final
step. Step five, and that is how to have
to say something about the books you
read. Okay, so you're talking to other
people. What do you say? What do you
talk about? Now, if you follow the last
steps, you probably already formed your
own opinion. You already have something
critical say to say about the book. you
can already fit it into some cultural
context
right there. You have something to say
already. But here are just a few final
tips to help you having something to say
about the books that you read. Like I
mentioned before, the question of do you
agree with what the story is trying to
say is a perfect conversation starter.
Let's take it back to 1984.
If you've read that, you can see it's
anti- athoritarian message. Do you agree
with it? And why do you agree with it?
These are the kind of books that can
really start long and amazing
discussions. And secondly, I think my
the best tip on creating new ideas and
having opinions on things is just can
you connect it to something else? Can
you connect two separate ideas? For
example, Babel and Blood Over Bride
Haven are both books, fantasy books that
use fantasy to critique colonialism.
Connect those two. In what ways are they
doing it differently? In what ways are
they similar? You can talk about that.
Blood Over Bright Haven is a pretty much
a direct metaphor for exploitative
colonialism. That's you connecting the
book with colonialism. You can talk
about that. How do you connect what
happens in this book to things that
happen in real life? You can have a
conversation about that. Wow, you're
gonna be so smart and cool and make a
lot of friends talking about books. Oh.
Oh my gosh. Wow. Got a little too
excited there. Lastly, it's always okay
to just look up spark notes on a book.
Look up a video essay about it. See what
other people have written about the
book. See what other people have already
analyzed about it. You don't have to do
all of it yourself.
Okay, now that we have all these tips on
how to engage more with the books that
you read, I just wanted to end on some
general tips on media literacy. And
again, for the sake of media literacy, I
am of course not an expert on this. I am
just a person like you that is trying to
be a little bit more aware of the things
that I consume. And these are just the
things that I do or tips that I've
accumulated from other places over the
years that have really helped me be a
more conscious consumer. The first I
think the most basic thing that you can
do to increase your media literacy is to
check the source of what you're reading.
Where does it actually come from? Who is
saying it? That article you're reading,
that random thing that you found
somewhere on the internet, where is it
actually coming from? Does this Tik
Tocker actually know what they're saying
or are they just regurgitating something
they heard somewhere else on the
internet? What does the person that is
publishing this or saying this gain from
saying what they're saying? Sometimes
people have a very obvious political
agenda or they are backed by political
partners or they're sponsored. Even for
example, if I have a sponsored video
like this video, you have to understand
that I am being paid to say the things
that I'm saying. If we bring it back to
reading, obviously a positive review
from just a random person on the
internet, you would read differently
than a positive review from the
publisher themselves or like a friend
from the author because they have a
personal agenda in seeing something
positive about that book. And of course
nowadays maybe you can't even find the
source of the information that you're
reading. If you are getting your
information from an AI summary or from
Ched GBT, you don't even know what the
information where the information is
coming from. And it's really hard to be
critical of what you're reading if you
don't even know where the information is
coming from in the first place. It
always helps to ask yourself, who
benefits from making me believe this or
making me feel this way? It's always
good to kind of check your own emotional
response and be mindful of how you are
emotionally responding to whatever
you're reading. You know, are you
getting really angry at it? Is the piece
you're reading making you hate someone
else or something else? Is it making you
disgusted about something? any kind of
really big emotion honestly should give
you a little bit of pause and makes you
think
how is this person or this piece of
media benefiting from me responding this
way again if you are just watching an
amazing Netflix show and you are crying
in response obviously they benefit
because you are watching a show that is
really good apparently and is making you
very emotional but that not necessarily
a bad thing it's good that they benefit
benefit from your like intense response
to that beautiful deuce season of
Bridgetton. But if let's say it's a
political piece and it's making you
really angry at certain groups of
people,
you might want to rethink that. On the
internet, you will constantly see people
be extra outrageous in their opinion
just to rage bait or to get you to
actually watch the Tik Tok or the video
because they benefit if you feel a
little shocked or outraged by what they
are saying. So yeah, that is like law
number one for media analysis. Media
literacy is where is this information
coming from and who benefits from
sharing this information with the world.
With all the tips that I gave in the
rest of the video about like learning to
find the main message of a piece of
media, learning to find the main theme,
you could think to yourself, okay, and
then what is the point of bringing this
message into the world? Who benefits
from that? For example, you're watching
just a general Tik Tok recipe video,
which I do all the time, and then they
are extremely positive about a certain
kitchen utensil that they use and they
happen to have a link to that in their
Tik Tok shop.
Classic example, they benefit if they
say something positive cuz they'll make
money. Another great thing to ask
yourself is, what is missing in what I'm
seeing? It's easy to focus on what is in
front of you, the text or the video, but
what is actually not being said? Maybe
there are some important arguments that
are being left out that you can think of
yourself. Whose voices are being
centered and whose voices are left out
of the conversation. Comparing
perspectives is always a great idea. If
you just found out about something new
and interesting, read about it somewhere
else as well. That's how you get the
picture. That's how you make sure you
don't just get one biased perspective.
You have to compare different
perspectives so you can create your own
biased perspective. Another thing that I
always ask myself, especially when
reading non-fiction books or reading
essays on the internet is, is this based
on opinions or is this piece based on
facts? Because sometimes people mostly
speak from personal experience, which is
not a problem. You know, it could be a
personal essay, could be a personal
story, and sometimes people speak mostly
from source material, from science. You
have to learn to be able to
differentiate between is this someone's
personal theory that they are sharing
with me or are they sharing some kind of
like consensus in science right now? And
last but not least, can you find any
contradictions in what they're saying? I
always find this the most difficult,
especially if I'm reading or listening
to something that I don't know a lot
about. I find it hard to find
contradictions because I feel like I
personally don't even understand
everything yet about this topic. You
know, I'm just a beginner on it. I'm
just a lay man. Um, but if you can find
inconsistencies in what they're saying,
well,
you've you've won the medal of critical
reading. You've won media literacy. I
would say to me finding inconsistencies
requires already having a bit of
background info on it. Uh but some
people are really good at finding in
inconsistencies even if they don't yet
uh know anything about the topic
themselves.
It's hard. I'm working on it. Actually,
I have to admit here that I sometimes
find it really difficult to read
critically because I tend to assume that
oh, I don't really know anything. And
this this thing that I'm reading right
now or this thing that I'm watching,
they seem to know a lot about it. So,
I'm sure they know more than me. I have
this tendency when I spot an
inconsistency to just assume that I'm
just not understanding it correctly. And
I'm kind of learning over the years that
that is just not always true. That just
because you are reading something that
someone wrote down or filmed, especially
on social media, doesn't necessarily
mean that they know what they're talking
about. So you always have to remain
critical and I guess kind of have faith
in yourself that you can have something
to say about that as well. Also ask
yourself, who is the intended audience
here? Is this piece of media even
intended at me? Like I would never watch
like a big carnivore meateers recipe and
then get angry and comment and be like,
"Oh my god, but like I don't eat meat,
so what would I do?" You think I'm not
the intended audience? And then you move
on. Anyway, I could go on with this list
forever and ever, but in the end it is
mostly just going to come down to what
is the source? What is the agenda of the
source? And don't just believe anything
that you find on the internet.
Oh, I love that. I hope you made notes
on this video. There's going to be a
test at the end. I will be grading each
and every one of you individually.
In two weeks, I will come out with
another video kind of in concordance
with this video about annotating and
reading to slow down and making notes
for self-care. And there I will share
all of my note takingaking tips with you
guys. So, I'm really excited to start
making that video. Let me know in the
comments if you have any specific
questions about how I annotate and how I
note. If you comment them quickly, I can
still incorporate them in that video
hopefully. And that being said, I really
hope you enjoyed this video. I hope you
have a wonderful rest of your day and I
will see you soon in another video very
soon. Goodbye.
[Music]
Loading video analysis...