Odd Sentence Out for CAT 2025 | VARC Preparation with Gejo | Episode 2 | Career Launcher

[Music] ladies and gentlemen welcome to the session now as trainers we have a responsibility and what is that

to ensure that you attain or hone or develop or create the right skills to ensure that you can ace the test

when it comes to barc the task is a tad difficult we really have to understand what is the questions that are trying to do now we are not privy to the

discussions with the question set up we don't know who they are we probably will have a rough idea maybe some faculty members but who knows and then they create these questions

it is from looking at the question and figuring out what they do with this question can we make sense of what is going through their mind and then we can create count strategy to

handle the questions right that that is a logical thing to do now we have these odd sentence questions in the cat we've got five sentences given to you four belong to the paragraph one does not and you have to figure out which is that one

sentence does not belong to the paragraph and in such a question we have to figure out what what goes on in creating these questions so ladies and gentlemen

we're going to meet some crazy question setters i'm using the word crazy yes i'm using the word crazy what i've done is i've picked up six odd sentence questions from across scat papers

and you i can actually pick up every single uh question paper but this is going to be a long session i just picked up six to illustrate my point

so let's get started ladies and gentlemen with this and we're going to meet some evil question setters let's start with this question from cat

2019 slot number one so of course the objective that we have is to identify that sentence which does not belong to the paragraph it may belong to the

larger discussion but does not belong to the specific paragraph okay we have got the first sentence that talks about one argument is that actors that do not fit within

the single well defined category may suffer an ill legitimacy discount so you've got this word actors so immediately when you look at this sentence naturally you will see that one

argument means that this needs some kind of a support from a previous sentence right so there could be many argument and that this is one argument okay the second let me start by saying

others which is nice all these sentences of of course also need support what were the desert belief that complex identities confuse audiences

about organization's role and purposes so we've got a lot of this world so one word that we can see is this complex identity uh we've got audiences we've got this word which is organization so these are

the key words it's important to look at these keywords it makes sense so there are others who believe that complex identities does something negative so obviously the the

centers before that could probably talk about there are some people who will believe that complex identities does something positive and others believe it is negative okay that's probably the center that we're looking at some

organization so we have got this echo word echo the words that getting repeated have complex multi dimensional identities so okay the word identities

is getting repeated and complex identities right so you've got that repetition that span or combine categories while other organization possess narrow identities so this talks

about there are these complex identities there are also narrow identities so this obviously as a sentence must come before sentence number two if at all both of them is part of the conversation because this is specifically talking about complex identities and this one is

talking about some organisms having complete identities and narrow identities okay then you have identity oh that's the identity is one of the most important features of organizations

okay we have got repetition of that idea but there exists opposing views that's interesting this what oppressing was among sociologists about how identify identities affect organized performance

and opposing view would be that there is something that is positive there is something that is negative negative statement is mentioned probably positive statement is mentioned there those who think that complex identities we have got

repetition of that word are beneficial so that's a positive thing right beneficial point or to strategic advantages of ambiguity and organization potential differentiate themselves and other belief so now we

know that the sentence number five and sentence number two must be must be in for sentence number five and sentence number two to be in sentence number four must also be in right and between so once we identify the sentence number

four is ends and number five is in sentence number two isn't when you look at this sentence this talks about actors who are these actors who the hell are these actors what are these actors we are talking about what is this uh the thing that we are talking about

illegitimacy disc on what are these things but i believe the sentence number three is connected to this thing as an organization having uh complex identities and narrow identities there are identities that is

there some are complex some more narrow but there are those who think that complex entities are beneficial others who think that complex and they're not beneficial and then figuring out that

odd sentence is number one okay make sense right no issues but this is not a session on how to answer the odd sentence question right we have to look

at the question so this question and figuring out sources from this question itself is a complete painful task right so it it takes in fact quite a lot of time to hunt for it because only thing that he

can do is take one sentence and then put it on the google and figure out where it's taken from and you typically what happens is that there are a lot of sites which has got cat 29 in paper those

sites come in first and then you have to hun go to page number two make some combinations and then eventually figure out oh i got it i got it this is from a journal article american journal of

sociology okay what is interesting is that this is a paragraph okay so let's start by looking at this particular paragraph and the first sentence says identity is one of the most important features of organization but it's a strong disagreement okay fair enough

this uh number one is our sentence number four he started with sentence number four the argument stems from the simple but important observation that the question decided to ditch

right so we have seen this in paragraph jumble i don't know if you have watched that particular video you can you should watch that video as well this talks about the and then it starts by saying that some organization of complex

multitable and this lady gentleman is sending number three here makes sense those who think that comprehensive beneficial strategy ambiguity in the knowledge the the competitors and so you have that

sentence number five so here until in sentence number five and of course as always this in in contrast is all it's all ditched there are scholars who believe so the questions that i decide to put it as

other scholars who believe the complexities and that purpose that is number two so the order therefore is four three five and two something that we identify but what is very interesting

is where is this odd sentence pick from this is odd sentence here where is that pick from that is in fact free from the very next sentence in particular zuckerman argues that actors that do not

fit within a single well-defined category may suffer an illegitimate uh tree discomfort what that that

like that is still part of that paragraph is that this is the right text sentence complex identities confuse audience and one of the argument to that is

actors do not fit in well in category in the eyes of attentive audience okay now why did the question decide that out of i'm sure that the odd

sentence in this so fine so questions that are ensured that these four sentences together forms a paragraph and in the question center's mind the question that has to create an odd sentence

what is the best way to create not sentence just give the next sentence but why is it god this sentence could have been picked from anywhere else his odd sentence could be created by the question sector

himself or could be picked from some other part of the article but it was picked right here now you would of course argue that look when you look at this as a paragraph this is a well connected paragraph i didn't think one of the most

important pieces of organization but there exists opposing views among sociologists about how identity affects organisms performance some organisms have complex multi-dimensional identities expand and combine categories but other organizations narrow

identities those who think that complex energy a beneficial point of satisfaction ambiguity and organizations potentially differentiate themselves competitors others believe that comprehensively confused audience support or about obvious roles and

purpose and therefore this particular sentence no way can fit in here because there is no no context to that probably you look at in this case uh in particular uh somebody argues that

actors that do not fit with the builder catalog in the eyes of the attending audiences and if you actually look at this particular sentence we don't know actually how to connect this sentence to this we just don't know so one of the questions that i decided is that okay

i'm just going to keep that sentence i'm just going to keep that sentence because logically for nobody can ever think of connecting that sentence with this particular paragraph so it works but why would it give that sentence

that means that the question setter really wants to pick the odd sentence which is in the same topic and okay so the this this probably will be

an article which is it's journaling right so it's going to have at least about 10 15 paragraphs the question setter could have picked up the not sentence from some other paragraph but no i'm going to pick up an

odd sentence which is near to that paragraph so that the odd sentence looks very similar to the conversation that is happening and people might get confused

and on top of it i'm gonna remove words uh like this uh uh what is it so argument seven from example but important observation i'm gonna remove it i'm gonna remove stuff like in

contrast i'm gonna make life painful for the guy a person writing the test you and me then gentlemen i don't want our people to look at these connected words obvious connected words i'm going to

make life difficult i would want probably people to use logic to answer this question that's probably what that is let's go to number two okay this one is bonkers okay

all right okay so let's figure out what that is so first of all we have this word translators and then there is word bumblebees right so there are two things that two

key words that comes out and it says that translators are like bumble bee so there is some sort of a comparison that is made between this t and b so you have got a t and b and they they are similar

though long since scientifically disproved this so this is an uh this is a good indicator uh this something is very near this

factoid factoid is a repeated unreliable fact right it's still routinely touted out so there is something that is returned

obviously this particular thing requires some sort of a support we need to look at some factoid if 2 has to exist 2 has to exist with the factoid 2 cannot exist independently without that so this is a

sentence that needs support so i'm going to call this sentence as ns sentences sentences need support the first sentence actually does not need any support of any other sentence prior to it right

similar so obviously this sentence also needs support similar pronouncement about the impossibility that's over there so we're looking at the word impossibility of translation so we have got repetition

of that keyword have dogged practitioners in leonardo bruni's they in in the priscione recta published in 1424.

so we have a date mentioned here there's a date here okay okay bees unaware of these deliberations

continue to go flower to flower so so we have got we have got repetition of that words which is bees okay bees is bumble bees or bees unaware of bees deliberation what are the deliberations

what are the discussion some debates they are unaware of this debate have continued to flee from far falcovar and then we have got this center which says translate does continue to

translate so this in one way is linked to this saying that look translators are like bumblebees in what way are like like bumble bees so there are some deliberations that is

happening but both don't care the bees continue to do what they do and translate to continue to do in 1934 french and entomologists august magnum pronounce the flight of a bumblebee

they've got the repetition of that particular word is aerodynamically impossible so now it makes sense now stuff makes sense now here logically

what you see is that sir we need to have sentence number one translators are like bumble bee right that makes sense how are they similar in

1934 people talk about impossibility of bumblebee and then we have got impossibility of translation and these two people who are unaware of this deliberation continue to do what they want to do so you can

actually see some logical thing about one five uh three and four now you might want to talk about okay but what about this sentence i mean we

can talk about this factoid is still routinely trotted out this has been scientifically disproved and this probably this is scientifically disproved

and why not for example go go from you might actually think why not go from one okay go to five and then go to two and end with the three right translators

are like bumble bees french account bumblebees are impossible these are disproved but still people talk about it and similarly there is impossibility of translation of dogs practitioner

okay so it's talks about like so there is similar pronouncement that that could be the likeness why why not this i mean

i mean there is no rule that the paragraph has to be complete but there is nothing that suggests the paragraph has to be complete people people could go with this the actual answer that is given is sentence

number two and that that in one sense makes sense so it's one five uh three and four is sort of a complete well tied sort of paragraph but

but it is taken from the spectator the translator a spy this is the paragraph okay

understand this translators are like bumblebees wonderful sentence number one in 1934 french entomologists uh

fly to the another impossible oh yes sentence number five [Music] our odd sentence sentence number three

i why all right so let's go back and look at the previous question five all the five sentences are there in the same paragraph

the last sentence is decided as the odd sentence all the five sentence can be found in the paragraph but the middle sentence is decided as an odd sentence okay you can logically say

that this odd sentence here does not play a role in the paragraph if you actually look at it this paragraph is complete in itself you could also give that logic here that this sentence does not actually play a role it's kind of odd here

why is it all it's not adding value to anything to the conversation which means that this sentence number one three four and five is very tight in itself it tells us a story and this sentence is actually not really needed

in that conversation and it makes sense the sentence makes sense there's no doubt translators are like bumble bees in 1934 french entomologist agus magnan pronounce the flight of the bumblebee to be aerodynamic impossible similar

pronouncement uh pronouns pronouncement similar pronouncement it makes sense this is well connected sentence about the impossibility of translations have dog

practitioner since uh this one i believe that i believe the reason why this has become odd okay is because this is now cut into a two sentence right

now if this is not there and cut into two sentences now this doesn't make any sense similar pronouncement there is no pronouncement here so the pronouncement so in the original piece these uh

this sentence this sentence here was that one complete sentence in in this one this gentleman pronounce the the flight of the bumble bee

anonymous diamond impossible and this one this one this one and then you have got a similar pronouncement right so here because this is one whole sentence these two sentences are well connected

but if you now break this sentence and cut this and create this part as one separate separate sentence it is very difficult to move from here to here it doesn't make sense it has to actually move from

five to three make sense you've got pronouncement you've got similar pronouncement that is what is logic but what is the questions that you're doing the question setter wants to give that odd sentence

which is very challenging for you how i'm just gonna pick one sentence that is probably there in the same paragraph and then make your life difficult

but moving on let's figure out okay so this is the third question cat 2017 we are going to 2017 now it's not very difficult actually over over the past fortnight

so 49 will be one couple of weeks one of its oh this sentence definitely requires support finance champion

managed to pull out a similar impression so we need support for the sentence sentence number one if sentence number one has to exist in this paragraph sentence number one definitely

requires some other sentence for its support so you have got similar what you have got a similar impression one of its finest champion what is its

finest champion wimbledon's greatest illusion is a sense of timelessness it evokes this makes sense now probably this is this one and

we are looking at this impression it's about the illusion in the time of sense it evokes and this is probably two and one goes to the perfectly wimbledon's greatest illusion in the sense of timelessness works over the past

fortnight one of wimbledon's finest champion has managed to pull off a similar illusion and that's that's the connection and who is that person we have got the name in being introduced here this makes makes sense

now it makes sense that he has to be the part of the conversation at 35 years and 343 days roger federer became the oldest man to win the singles title in the open era

a full 40 years after the first claim the title as a scuffy ponytail upstarts oh now at the end of the day we know for a fact that these three are two three three sentences

need to be there other than this conversation has to be there i think there is no way uh these uh these things is well packed once he okay this obviously would be

roger federer survey of the opening week now we have a discussion about what is happening in the opening week the second week witness a range of uh

rested rested so this is what is going on here this is talking about some specific detail getting into deep we are just introducing the story we just started with the story

and given that his method of we have got we have got his method isn't reliant on explosive athleticism and muscular ball striking both vulnerable decay there is a cost to believe that federer will

continue to enchant for a wide longer enchant nice you've got that is uh the repetition of that thought and idea that he created illusion is creating

impression so he is at 35 he is the oldest man to do it and 35 is oldest man to do it so let's pick another color there 35 years old as many do it and it's

continue to do that and i know that five can be the part of the conversation for sure and there is no there is five has to be the part of the conversation and four can be skipped because what are the four actually doing four is to talk about something very

specific talking about what is happening in the opening week what is happening the next week why is he rested give me some context this is not there okay bye good no problem but let's look at what the questions are done this is actually

taken from the hindu this article uh i don't know whether you are able to read this okay so i'm just going to put it like this okay

so that you can read so we have got this sentence wimbledon's greatest illusion sense of timeliness work over the past fortnight is hallow and lost one of the finest example of impression at 35 32 years older my opener full of rice

coffee update starts okay you've got that sentence i believe that this sentence is the second sentence this is the first sentence in the question the second sentence then the first sentence and we have got a

third sentence okay let's find out this sentence the odd sentence is four let's find out where is the fifth sentence okay let's continue this and figure out where the fifth sentence sunday's time continued the dominant

magical truth and setting master something no one saw coming okay for the second week witness a range of arrested federal genius we have got our odd sentence we have got a lot of

sentence once he survives we witness arrested genius we have a wrong sentence here right in the middle of your odd sentence here we've got odd sentence but where is it where is the last

sentence grigor where's where where is where is where is that sentence ladies and gentlemen there is that sentence oh dear god there it is

what what just happened the question setter create a paragraph by picking ladies and gentlemen the first three sentence and then jumped and picked this sentence

and connected those four sentences together and made a paragraph and gave an odd sentence which is right in the middle of it and i'm i'm sure that is an odd sentence there's no problem okay if you look at this this is

an amazing four sentence it's a paragraph it makes complete sense wimbledon's greatest illusion is a sense of timelessness it evokes over the past four times one of his finest champion managed to pull off a similar impression

at 35 years and 343 days raj federer became the oldest man to win the singles title in the open era a full 14 years after the first claim the title has said ponytail upstart even that his method isn't reliant on exclusive athleticism

or muscular bald striking or vulnerable dk there is a cost to believe that federer has continued and and then this particular sentence this has got no role the way this paragraph has been created this sentence

has got no role there because this is talking about something very specific we are talking about opening week it sent me why are we talking about that doesn't fit in the conversation but look at what the questions that is doing the question

setter is taking a source not blindly copying it not blindly copying it they're actually creating a paragraph independent

or probably different in a structure from the original source so ladies and gentlemen if you were to think odd sentences okay

that if if you ever think that odd sentence questions how do they create yeah what is so easy to create take one paragraph which has got four sentences give the four sentence pick one sentence

randomly for somewhere else no okay all right we are hitting 2020 slot 2.

let's see you can observe truth of this okay nice nice nice nice this truth of this

what is this what is this okay this this sentence needs support this sentence needs support need somebody else in every e-business model every constructed

monopolize monopolize that's an idea monopolize and protect data but i'm looking at this sentence the way in which this sentence is constructed this e-business is given as an example of a

particular phenomenon you can observe the truth of this so the truth is already mentioned so let me give an example of the truth about that in e-business model ever considered there is monopolization and protection

of data okay so okay if this sentence has to exist then the discussion has to be about monopolizing data economics and technologies believe so we

have got some new people new sort of belief there are somebody these people believe okay now believe would be when you have sentences like this the author is trying to use someone else

uh as a part of the conversation that a new kind of capitalism is being created different from industrial capitalism as was mental capitalism now you've got another term which is a term is

capitalism okay so this one talk about capitalism all right in 1962 kenneth arrow the guru of mainstream economics said that in a free

market economy the purpose of inventing thing is to create intellectual property rights now this word here which we we can we can actually see this word which

is intellectual property right purpose of inventing things your inventing thing is to create intellectual property right and interesting property right is about protecting data right so so so there

probably is not a direct link but from an idea perspective that sort of a connection between what you can see in one and three though there is no connection between here here probably a free market economy to capitalism but this is this is talking about

inventing things to to to in this idea to create english data okay there is alongside the world of monopolized information and

surveillance a different dynamic there is alongside the world of this survey a different dynamic growing up information is social good incapable of getting owned so that is in contrast between

protecting data so the word alongside suggest okay so alongside is another indication that while this monopoly is happening while monopoly happening there is also a

different thing that is happening which is as a social good okay so let me pick another color that i've already picked let me pick this one social good in cable getting on yet

or that is that is a movement information is abandoned it this is what is this this one has three sentence this this is like what

information goods are freely replicable once the thing is made it can be copied and pasted infinitely so yet so it is a transition

that information is abundant information is abundant information is abundant information goods are replicable it can be copied and pasted and in one

sense you can actually see that you've got sentence number one and sentence number three connected with the idea that intellectual property that people protect yet

we have got a place until is abandoned and it's kind of very difficult to figure out what is exactly but but in some way four four is aligned to what is what is i have conversation that is

happening here these links are not very obvious sort of links but we know here but reading this this just doesn't make any sense economists believe that a new kind of capitalism is created where is the discussion about

capitalism this discussion is not happening though we are not able to kind of exactly figure out what is a conversation happening here but one thing that is certain that this this this this particular world has no role

and that particular sentence has to be the odds and this year right yeah okay take it from the guardian the topic is end of capitalism has begun okay so the entire article is about

capitalism this is this is a long article okay i'm gonna hunt these sentences okay let's start

during the right second world economics viewed information simply as public good the u.s government even decreed that no

the u.s government even decreed that no profit should be made out of patents only the production of process itself then we began to understand intellectual property in 1962

that's our sentence number three randomly in the middle of that paragraph end of the paragraph kenneth mainstream economics said that the free market would be okay in the property right

that's it he noted there was a lot missed okay you can observe the truth of this in every uh uh e-business model ever constructed

monopolist and protect data that's it that's it that's that's it this is we stuck there that is our sentence number one okay so we kind of missed this part we chucked this one

okay let's carry on capture the free social interaction data all these are not needed questions that i don't need all these sentences if you restate arrow principle and reverse its revolution implication or

obvious the free market economy plus intelligence probably leads to under the utilized information then economy based on fuel utilizing information well all these are not there not there okay not not there not that of course that i will

not use it yet information is abundant information is really applicable one thing is made it can be copy pasted infinitely nice nice nice we have got this particular sentence here where is

it sentence number five so far we have got sentence number three sentence number one sentence number five here nice nice nice a music track whatever we thought we not eat we don't need for the past 25 years economy have been

wrestling with this problem all mainstream economic justice do all this we don't need there is alongside a world of monopolized information created by governments different in

information is a social good exploited oh lady gentlemen some version of this is sentence number four so this question set up and i have no

idea this was somewhere else this was in some other part of the conversation this question set up pick one paragraph two paragraph three

four five from six paragraph picked four sentence to create his paragraph and how did he create there is no link between any of these sentence sentence picked us it is

we have picked one sentence from here nice and directly prepare to pick this sentence uh probably it's fine it's fine it's fine this end is okay because this part of the sentence is merely

explaining what the sentence is and then we went when and pick this sentence and we pick this sentence uh it does make some sense

this one doesn't make some sense in 1962 kenneth arrow the guru of mainstream economics uh said that the free market economy the purpose of inventing things is to create intellectual property rights you can observe the truth of this

in every business model ever constructed monopolize and protect data yet information is abundant information goods are freely replicable once the thing is made it can be copied and pasted infinitely i think that these

three sentences these sentences are fitting perfectly but only probably this sentence there is alongside the world of monopolized information and surveillance and different dynamics growing up information is a social good incapable

of being owned exploited and priced so there is actually sort of uh no direct linkage to this the first reason is a kind of good sentence the question

set up should have made some connection that is just pick this sentence but but this also is definitely odd right we have no crypts here this is definitely odd economics talking about the new kind

of capitalism new kind of capitalism different from industry and capitalism american capitalism there is nothing on that there is no role of that particular sentence in the conversation that is going on yeah

tomorrow ladies and gentlemen we are going to cat 2021 slot number two something that has happened last year those people who have taken slot 2 last year in cat 20 would have gone what is

this slot in vrc slot slot 2 had some crazy stuff going on okay they care with which philosopher examine argument

for and against forms of biotechnology right so we have got this term we are talking about philosophers and there is argument for and against

forms of god this word biotechnology make this an excellent primer of on formulating and assessing moral argument when you look at this uh it says you you've got another one uh this

scene is talking about the fact that okay if you look at the argument that is that is there in biotechnology foreign against it's a we can use that to create moral arguments so a lot of

keywords uh that we can mention here a lot of words here okay the sentence has got three sort of keyword philosophers can look at the debate around biotechnology and use that

to formulate more moral arguments nice good although most people find at least at least some form of genetic engineering

so can biotechnology genetic engineering will be sort of a part of it but let's we don't know okay let's let's just put that in another color i'm losing out of color okay

uh disquieting it is not easy to articulate why what is wrong with re-engineering our nature okay so it's it's this this particular sentence is taking out that many people who find at least some form of gender

and bad but it's not we could say why we don't know why fair enough breakthrough in genetics okay we're getting into genetics presence with with promise that we will soon be able to

prevent host of debilitating diseases and predicament that our newfound genetic knowledge may enables us to enhance the genetic trait okay so there is some positive about negative genetics

some positive thing there are some people who find the genetics negative so we got that contrast okay to grapple with

ethics of enhancement okay fair enough so we we have this word i i think i can see the word enhance our genetic traits the ethics of enhancement okay we need

to confront questions that verge on theology which is why modern philosophers and political theorists tend to shrink from them okay the modern philosophers don't

look at that okay right one argument what is one argument for what is that drive for human perfection

through genetics okay we have got genetics is objectionable as it represents a bid for mastery that fails to appreciate the gifts of human power achievement so this is talking

about something that is negative for genetics so i can see that there is probably some sort of a connection between two and five in one way right and uh we also can talk about the fact

that breakthroughs in genetic present with promise that is dehabilitating disease is a predicament that a newfound genetic knowledge may enable to enhance a lot of things but to do that uh

we need to uh confront certain questions and but philosophers are not uh caring about that so probably some some sort of a connection

maybe this comes towards the end maybe maybe that's happening maybe or probably this can start with genetics is there uh some people has got a certain issue

right and you've got one argument is genetics objectionable but to grapple with the ethics of these things we have to convert a lot of questions that that could be a way but it's

connected so here here i think i think if you look at this sentence number one a talks about buyer technology that is sort of very broad and it's talking about

formulating and assessing moral arguments that's what here the hero is moral argument let's use biotechnology as a sort of a sub product for a hero which is moral argument so in

this sentence the focus largely in support let's just use biotechnology to create moral arguments so but none of these sentences number five four three or two is

addressing creation or assessment of moral arguments it is talking about the issues within genetics genetic engineering ethics around genetics genetic engineering enhancement

so ethics of enhancement and enhancement could be there and enhance our genetic trait so we've got genetics is objectionable so it's sort of debates around genetics it's probably maybe very difficult to

figure out what the exact flow is we don't have to do that when it comes to odd sentence and then maybe you can say that one is odd okay but what is the question centered this

is taken from uh there is a journal the case against perfection ethics in the age of genetic engineering well let's look at this okay

let's let's look at what's happening here breakthroughs in genetic presence with promise and predicament promise and predicament it gives us

positive as well as negative but this question setter starts with a promise break with promise just looked at promise so predicament he missed it the

promise that will soon be able to treat the habilitating the predicament okay we have got a private equipment actually if i look at it this is this now i'm picking this one

this has got actually a positive send statement and there's a negative one right so so we have the we have got certain predicament that is mentioned here some

some promise and there is a negative okay okay there you go the predicament i think these uh all these sentences together is is is got together as our sentence number

three and although most people find at least some form generally equating articulate why what is under these two sentences were connected together to create a sentence number two okay we

have got three and two okay all right the case against perfection explore these and other moral con quandaries connected with the quest to perfect

ourselves anarchy okay all the same the case against explore these and other moral quandaries connected with this you are exploring moral thing this one is talking about formulating moral arguments so that is very different okay

pursue the perception is flawed for reasons that go beyond safety and fairness that the drive to enhance human nature through genetic technology is objectionable there you go okay

one argument that is objectionable okay so there is some it is picked from here and some some it's minor that it has been made to that particular sentence because the bid for for gifted human achievements okay there is there you

have sentence number five that you have sentenced number five discourse that is not there in order to grapple with the ethics of women you need to confront the issues modern but since this question version

theology all these are combined together and created sentence number four somehow a this

is from a journal right number one number two is the discussion is very complicated right the origin article is taking now and breaking down in one sentence we have

got another sentence uh looking at a lot many information to us so that the the information that is given to given given to us is easy to digest now one of the questions that are

decided is that i'm going to combine these three sentences together to make one sentence then i'm going to combine all these sentences together and make sentence i'm going to ditch some of these sentences in the middle i'm going to take this

sentence and combine not many things and create another sentence and then i'm gonna i'm gonna go all the way down here and then combine all these sentences and create the sentence now it does not matter because people would have already

got confused with this with a crazy ass sentences look at look at how big these sentences is and then i'm just randomly gonna write one sentence from somewhere and people will go anywhere go bonkers

because they will not know what the hell is happening and i'll put it right in number one you know how painful it is to give awesomeness number one okay look at let me let me

actually let me uh open a page and help you understand one two three four and five okay there is a odd sentence can be number one

right or sentence can be the second sentence or sentence can be the third sentence or just can be the fourth sentence or this can be the fifth sentence okay let's start from here and the origin is actually the fifth sentence

now what happens is that when i'm reading this the since this first four sentence is actually part of the story we'll start seeing connection between the sentence so it's easy to understand when i read the first three sentence because all

them are part of the actual paragraph this makes sense and if odd sentence is actually the fourth sentence is still manageable right because when i read the first three

sentence i know these there's already some linkages i get it if the odds the third sentence we start having a little bit of an issue because we read the first channel we read the second sentence somewhere they

connected then we go to the third sentence we start getting oh okay so then we start thinking okay something is not going wrong something is going on we have a problem imagine the origin is to be the second sentence

we read the first sentence we read the second sentence there is no connection because second is actually odd then we go to the third sentence then we are figuring out okay which one which one is connecting which one is that

i know imagine the odds the first one we read the first sentence we go to the second sentence we don't know what is happening we go to the third sentence the evil questions and they will put the

sentence as the first one and to create the first sin is an odd sentence and to create such long

sentences combined together on such a topic pure evil well then

and you could you could read this and let's just read the sentence and see okay let's just read this sentence what is what is the paragraph breakthroughs in genetics present this with the

promise that we will be soon we will soon be able to prevent a host of debilitating diseases and the predicament that a newfound genetic knowledge may enable us to enhance our genetic traits

although most people find at least some form of genetic engineering disquieting it is not easy to articulate why what is wrong with the engineering and nature one argument is that drive for human

perfection through genetics is objectionable and it represents a bid for mastery that fails to appreciate gifts of human personal achievement to grapple with the ethics of enhancement we need to confront questions that words

on theology which is why modern philosophers and political theorists tend to sing from them what is this what what is what is this fair enough

the question that that said okay i'm gonna i'm gonna ensure that the odd sentence is so odd that i'm just gonna use the word biotechnology where everything is actually talking about genetic engineering specifically

genetic uh enhancement okay probably this one genetics so that should be good enough and the whole thing about this moral arguments is not mentioned anywhere else so you

don't have to actually reorder this is there it's easy this question is easy question i'm just trying to psych you out that's what the question is saying we go to the last one and this one is

so too good okay a particularly interesting example of inference occurs in many single panel

comics okay so we have got inferences the word so you've got this word inference occurs in

single panel comics a particularly interesting example which means in this example of inference so if there is a sentence before it it should introduce its inference

and then say inference occurs in single panel comic whatever center that goes after it has to explain to us what is inference that happening in single panel comments so

that's what the sentence is trying to do it's a creator's perception so we have got another word here keyword let's look at it's a creator's perception and imagination that makes a single balance comic so

engaging and so rewarding okay so that's that's fine okay we've got what makes single panel comic rewarding it's a person who creates it okay

often the humor requires you okay so now he's talking to us you means will be probably the reader to imagine what happened in the instant

immediately before or immediately after the panel you have been shown so imagine what happened in one sense you are making inferences no

okay so humor require to get a joke you you actually have to figure out okay so we let's yellow signal you actually oops

you actually have to figure out what simple panel could be okay this have to figure out what some of these missing simple panels figure out that is again inference so you've got some missing uh some of these missing so

you've got missing must be so you've got a single panel comic no you just have one panel comic it's just one comic so there are maybe something before it something after it you have to make sense of that and maybe you ought to

figure out so this three or four make sense it is as though the cartoon is the creator right so here we have the creator devised a series of panel to sell a

story and chosen to show you only only one and typically not even the funniest so chosen to show you only one and so chosen this only one so you have to figure out some of these other things

so these these three sentences make a lot of sense right in sort of connected in nice way and therefore these inferences so we need sentence number one to start the conversation now sentence number two you're looking at

ima so engaging now we actually look at that sentence it says creators participation and imagination it says the creator is imagining who is

imagining we are imagining we are trying to figure out inference is made by us not the creator but the audience they send this number two it doesn't

make sense this should be odd right just you're asking me to imagine need to imagine then you are that you're asking the audience to imagine it's like

audience imagining the audience imagining this is for us for the audience chosen to show you and where is the creator's participation then and where is the creator's imagination it's

audience participation all these imaginations that make sense that should be number two now you look at this is taken from this book okay this took a lot of while to actually search this one okay i finally

got it i'm to look at part of this okay so you say immediately what happened instantly before after being shown which is which which will be that one it is as though the cartoonist divides the panel

typically one okay which all that look at the odd sentence it is right there in the middle of the conversation it is act of audience participation and imagination

the sense was audience you know what the questions that are done

pick the sentence exactly as it is and then change the audience to creator

and give third chance and give it to us this makes sense a particular interesting example of inference occurs in many single panel comics often the human requires you to imagine what happens when the incident immediately

before or immediately after pattern is shown it is as though the carpenter's device sees a panel tell you the the story and has chosen you chosen to show you only one and typically not in the furnace to get the job you actually have

to figure out create a smart expression ladies gentlemen what can we learn i think what the questions are is doing

they are doing everything possible they're basically taking a source right they are picking stuff from uh uh some source

they're picking stuff from some source and they're editing it and creating their own paragraphs so all we need we have to have certain tools some logical tool in our disposal

to figure out how to handle odd sentence questions it cannot be based on connected words right or transition words it has to be basic logic

how how the keyword repetition happens right what what are echo words what which word is occurring what what is the argument that is presented what is the logical form idea that one

can see and which is that one sentence that does not make any sense okay next time when we do an odd sentence lesson

keeping this in mind we'll try and create some oh what happened to my hand oh this green green is not good what's happening it's only the sand

wait a minute the sand is okay what's happening to my right hand it's gone after records and then the right hand

has become very odd okay in the uh in the next set of uh videos when we do we'll keep this thing

in mind and define strategy to deal with all sentence questions