Sustainable Business | Frank Wijen | TEDxErasmusUniversityRotterdam
By TEDx Talks
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Sustainability saves humans, not the planet**: Wijen reframes sustainability: the planet will easily outlive humanity, so it is about us saving us from ourselves by wisely managing natural resources and ensuring social inclusion for marginalized actors. [01:35] - **Why sustainable business resists operationalization**: Wijen calls it 'damn hard' to operationalize because sustainable business is value-laden and normative, involves a multitude of interactions among actors and factors, and is a constantly moving target. [02:47] - **Microcredit flooding drove borrowers to suicide**: When microcredit schemes proliferated in Kenya and India, the combination of joint liability and community social pressure sometimes led desperate defaulting micro-borrowers in India to commit suicide. [05:01] - **EV batteries hide brutal supply chains**: Electric car batteries require extremely energy-intensive production, contain toxic materials, and rely on cobalt and rare earth minerals mined from conflict-ridden areas like Sudan and the Democratic Congo, devastating local landscapes. [05:45] - **IKEA accepted child labor to truly solve it**: Rather than wash their hands in innocence, IKEA teamed up with UNICEF to accept child labor in an Indian carpet maker only alongside structural solutions: schooling, credit access for parents, and tackling root causes of family poverty. [08:19] - **Three principles for sustainable business**: Wijen distills his research into three principles: see the bigger picture (direct and indirect, short- and long-run effects), contextualize actions instead of one-size-fits-all solutions, and align short-term incentives with long-term collective interests. [12:30]
Topics Covered
- We're Saving Us, Not the Planet
- Why Sustainable Business Is Maddeningly Hard
- Banning Child Labor Can Deepen Poverty
- Three Principles for Effective Sustainability
Full Transcript
sustainability is a hot topic these days it used to be the Reaume of the occasional tree hugger and bird lover but it seems that today everybody has
embraced sustainability be it firms governments citizens everyone is talking the sustainability buzz in the context
of business sustainability is also known under one of its many related terms such as corporate responsibility shared value
creation inclusive capitalism social plant enterprise and so on and so forth as an academic you might expect me to disentangle all these different terms
but I would just say for forget about the academic crap because in essence all these terms boil down to sustainable
development a term that was coined in 1987 by the United Nations Commission held by Gro Brundtland defining sustainable development as meeting the
needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs in other words you can have your share of
the pie but you should also leave enough for others so that they can have theirs as well sustainable development is sometimes misinterpreted as saving the
planet forget about that the planet will easily outlive humanity it is rather about us saving us from ourselves by
wisely managing natural resources sustainable development is also about social inclusion making sure that marginalized actors the have-nots
will have equal access to job opportunities and they'll be elevated out of poverty so sustainable development as
development has both an environmental and a social dimension now at a higher level this may seem quite obvious or
appealing but what if we want to translate these principles into actual practices as an academic research for management
I've been trying to get my head around the question for the past 20 plus years and I must admit I haven't managed to do
so properly and this just freaks me out it drives me crazy what is on the line this difficulty to come to practical
terms with sustainable business in essence it's a combination of three factors sustainable business is fairly Laden or normative it is about what is
good what is bad and who decides what's good and what is bad it is complex there is a multitude of interactions among and
between actors and factors and this dynamic is a moving target hard to catch and this combination of factors Rannells
it so damn hard to operationalize sustainable business this has not been though that we should give up on our ambition to come to terms with it or
that all interpretations are equally imperfect some are clearly better than
others let me give you a few examples of bad interpretations I was recently in a
hotel that proudly served Fairtrade shampoo from Mauritius an island of the South East African coast and at first sight you would say that's a great idea
you give a decent price to these poor farmers so that I could can sustain a better life a live Lee hood so who would be against that but if you think more
carefully about it what about the carbon footprint of bringing the ingredients all the way from reaches to the Netherlands now what
about the plastic disposable packaging of that shampoo how sustainable as that another example in a related vein is the
use of microcredit these small loans given to marginalized actors so that they can have access to
credit and to develop some business in itself this can be an effective tool to pull marginalized actors out of their
poverty cycle however the popularity of microcredit has led to a genuine proliferation of schemes and sometimes
flooding markets such as Kenya and India and the combination with a social pressure of local communities who are jointly liable for individual micro
loans this has sometimes led desperate defaulting micro borrowers in India to
commit suicide how sustainable is that we are finally sort of collectively understood that we need to move away from fossil fuels towards more renewable
types of energy and in the domain of mobility electric cars are a very promising contribution to that energy
transition there are though a few tiny problems with electric cars at this at this moment in particular the batteries
they have some issues the production of battery is extremely energy intensive where does that energy come from is
there from renewable sources what about the recharging of the batteries does that come from renewable energy the batteries themselves they contain all
kinds of toxic materials you too rather not be exposed to what about their sourcing what about the use including
the possibility of the release of these toxic chemicals during the car accident what about their disposal after the useful lifetimes
furthermore these batteries contain the cobalt and other rare earth minerals mined from conflict-ridden areas such as
Sudan and Democratic Congo what is the impact of this mining on the local sometimes armed conflicts the mining
itself furthermore literally devastates the local landscapes so how sustainable
is that fortunately there are also better interpretations one is oddly
enough in the domain of child labour to be sure in an ideal world there is no child labour kids should go to school
that should play they should relax be kids and when I was first confronted with child labor I was marketing manager frequently
traveling to Africa I was really shocked and I thought we should ban child labour for sure but if you think more closely about this what if you ban child labour
and there's no better alternatives what happens to the fate of these kids that might actually end up in worse outcomes
such as prostitution such as mining and their families might further impoverish that is why certain companies rather
than washing their hands in innocence have taken bold step forward to address this problem heads on IKEA teamed up
with UNICEF accepting child labor and the production of Indian carpet manufacturer drug manufacturing provided there would be structural solutions
including schooling including access to credit facilities for their parents so that the deaths of their parents which are in India often a root cause of child
labor could be addressed and that if the kids would have prospects of a brighter future you might have heard of sustainability standards these are for example
ecological labels social schemes signaling that certain products have social and/or environmental benefits the
American non-governmental organization rainforest alliance issues such standards and the nice thing about their work is they have differentiated
standards per region and per group of users for example they have different water management practices prescribes
for dryland farming than for agriculture in tropical rainforests and they have different standards for smallholder
farmers than for larger more industrially operating farmers because the local needs and possibilities are
different per region there are different per group and by matching these needs and possibilities with the prescriptions
they come to more effective solutions I'm a chocolate lover and apparently I'm not the only one because the demand for cocoa beans a major ingredient of
chocolate has been on the rise for years the supply of cocoa beans fluctuates depending on the harvests but we can see
that structurally speaking it is sort of stagnating why 60% of the cocoa bean production originates from Ghana and
Ivory Coast and due to unsustainable agricultural practices in the past the soil had been eroded and it was impossible to increase the production
volumes therefore Mars the chocolate bar producer set up a scheme whereby
technology was transferred and farmers were schooled in order to enrich the soils and to come to more sustainable solutions for the long run
speaking about the long the Dutch government Believe It or Not as sometimes proceeded from simply
buying products towards procuring services in a traditional tender the government would simply buy from the
lowest bidder meaning that companies will be incentivized to offer and fear your products and a new system that
works quite differently rather than simply buying the goods they would tender the services take the example of a road construction company the company
would not just sell a rota to come to the government no instead it will build a road but also maintain that piece of
road over a period of 20 years maintaining it and therefore the company is obviously incentivized to use very
durable materials this is one example of a circular economy where we move away from a system of frequently procuring
using and discarding of resources to its closing the loop and using and reusing
resources over and over and over if you take the good and the bad examples what are some lessons we can distill what are
some key principles to effectuate more sustainable practices first we need to
see the bigger picture rather than focus only on specific issues say carbon footprint say direct farmer income we need to see all the different issues
combined we need to see not only the direct effects but also the indirect effects think of addressing the problem of child labour where there might be a
sort of a loophole if we don't have better alternatives we should think not only of the short-run outcomes but also of the longer-run outcomes think of the
short-run effect of direct access to credit versus the possibility of over indebtedness if you want to avoid such situations we need to see that bigger
picture now obviously this is easier said than done it's quite complex but fortunately with the advancements in information technology think of big data
think of artificial intelligence this should become increasingly feasible how
sustainable could that be second we need to contextualize actions we need to move
away from broad-brush Universal one-size-fits-all solutions towards more contextualized solutions that fit with
the needs of local regions and local groups think of dryland farming versus rainforest farming and also think of the
needs of small farms and the managerial practices and resources they have versus large more industrially operating forms
if you contextualise actions looking on a case-by-case basis what are the most optimal practices you can apply we can
make bold steps forward how sustainable could that be thirdly we need to align
incentives we need to ensure that the short-term incentives for individual producers and consumers become aligned
with a longer-term collective interests that we all cherish and this means that we need to redesign the game structure
think for example of moving away from linear towards more circular solutions also think in terms of moving away from
short-term agricultural practices exploiting the soil degrading it towards longer run solutions incentivizing
people to work towards the sustenance of their agricultural so if you combine these three principles
what can be infirm I think it's fair to say that sustainable business will to a certain extent always remain somewhat context it because we all have different
values and interests and we all have an imperfect understanding of reality we can though surely make both steps
forward if we live up to their three principles of seeing the bigger picture of contextualizing actions and of
aligning incentives sustainable business should not be about quarrels of the use of the right terminology neither should
it be about good intentions and bad practices but it should definitely about moving towards more effective solutions
that were both locally and globally for sure this will be a demanding but also a very important and a fascinating journey
and I invite you to join me on that journey thank you you
Loading video analysis...