LongCut logo

The AI Agent Economy Is Here

By Y Combinator

Summary

## Key takeaways - **Claude Code Builds Entire Startups**: Gary had a real AGI moment when Claude Code replicated years of work from his previous startup in just two weeks. Non-technical CEOs are automating entire business parts using OpenClaw. [01:49], [01:51] - **Agents Form Parallel Economy**: Agents will create a whole economy in parallel to the human economy by picking and choosing dev tools, products, or services. This shifts go-to-market as agents autonomously select tools like on Moltbook. [02:49], [03:08] - **Agent-Friendly Docs Drive Adoption**: Resend optimized documentation to be LLM-parsable with structured bullet points and code snippets, making it the default answer from models like ChatGPT for email sending. This turned ChatGPT into their top inbound channel. [07:37], [08:01] - **Supabase Wins Agent Default**: Agents choose Supabase as the default Postgres database because it has the best documentation online, leading to an explosion in demand. Build something agents choose. [04:51], [05:01] - **Agent-Specific Infrastructure Booms**: Agent Mail built the first email provider designed for AI agents, exploding in usage after OpenClaw as Gmail blocks automation to prevent spam. Agents need their own email, phone numbers, and tech stack. [11:42], [12:18] - **Swarm Intelligence Trumps God AI**: AGI is here via swarms of agents exhibiting superhuman swarm intelligence like biological systems, not mega god intelligence. On Moltbook, agents collaborate like trading restaurant notes, growing faster than Reddit. [15:01], [17:29]

Topics Covered

  • Agents Choose Dev Tools
  • Optimize Docs for Agents
  • Agent-Native Infrastructure Explodes
  • Swarm Intelligence Trumps God AI
  • Build for Agent Preferences

Full Transcript

Welcome to another episode of the light cone. Things are a bit different around

cone. Things are a bit different around here. For one thing, Claude Code has

here. For one thing, Claude Code has totally taken over my life. And if Jared is any indication, I think OpenClaw maybe has taken over his.

>> I've been really addicted to this new site called Moltbook, where people have unleashed their AIS to interact in the first ever AI agent-only online

community. I am here impersonating my

community. I am here impersonating my personal OpenClaw instance right here.

Okay, I can't do this, guys. We got to take this off.

Okay, we've gotten that out of the way.

I mean, some crazy stuff is happening right now. Uh, I have, you know,

right now. Uh, I have, you know, non-technical CEO friends who are going allin on OpenClaw. They're automating

entire parts of their businesses, uh, entirely using OpenClaw right now, which is totally insane. Simultaneous to that, you have, you know, product and former

engineering CEOs, uh, kind of like myself. It's like, I hadn't written code

myself. It's like, I hadn't written code in 10 years, and then now I'm up till 2 3:00 a.m. every single night running

3:00 a.m. every single night running four conductor simultaneous workers with cloud code. So, you know, there's sort

cloud code. So, you know, there's sort of this explosion in uh model capability. You know, we've been talking

capability. You know, we've been talking about this for several years, >> but then it feels like it's here. Like

AGI is literally actually here. And uh

you know we're sort of at the thin edge of the wedge like everyone now kind of knows like one or two people who have gone full cyber psychosis and I'm one of those people now. What's happening guys?

Like I mean you're saying you're you know all in on molt book. You know

what's going on?

>> Yeah. I feel like your real feel the AGI moment Gary was like getting Claude Code to build basically an entire startup for you. Like replicating years of work of

you. Like replicating years of work of your previous startup in like two weeks which is like insane. And I had a similar feel of the AGI moment just reading malt book, just reading the AI

talking to each other and interacting like in their own world with no or minimal human involvement. It just

really opened my eyes to what the next few years could look like when the agents are unleashed and go on about their lives without us.

>> Yeah, I think the no human involvement is the big piece. Like if you if you think back a year ago, we were talking about cursor versus wind surf and like that product experience was essentially

like advanced autocomplete arguably and now clearly what's going with claw code is like the people just trust the agents to make decisions for them. Like it's

like the experience is like and like you're talking about it's like four or five different agents going at the same time and you're switching between them but you're not actually micromanaging them anymore which means the agents are going out there like choosing things

which you know sort of an interesting unexpected application of that is like they can go out and choose to post their own content on a site like Moldbook. But

then interesting thing for builders is the agents are going to go out and choose tools to use to build things which is going to essentially create this whole economy of agents like

picking and choosing dev tools or maybe other like products or goods and services who knows but it you'll essentially have this whole agent economy going on in parallel to the

human economy. I think back in the be

human economy. I think back in the be days, old days before all of this, dev tools were chosen more from developers talking to each other or uh

>> go for flow.

>> Stack flow.

>> Unbelievable, right?

>> Or GitHub repos that would trend that were done by a human. But the go to market for dev tools I think is dramatically shifting. I think for

dramatically shifting. I think for couple of things. One, as you noted with the uh cyber psychosis, suddenly the market of developers has increased from

just 20 million or so developers that are trained in computer science to now anyone in the world could be one. could

be hundreds of millions of people now >> plus all of their agents who are all acting like semi-independently like Har is saying >> and then compounded with the agents who then are sort of the oracle telling you

what the best tool is and we are actually seeing some of those trends with the growth of YC companies dev tool companies that are doing really well because of this of all these trends maybe we should talk about those and why

is that >> I mean one that springs to mind it's like a a stash a friend of ours Sagalov had mentioned to a while ago. It's just

like then if you look at like the number of databases being created over like simple database postcrist databases over like the last 12 months and the number has just exploded. Um, and that's because it's all people vibe coding and

building apps and the agents going out choosing like a database tool and like a knock on effect for that for YC company is Superbase has just seen like an explosion the demand for databases right and the a what's interesting is the

agents are choosing superbase as a default tool to like set up and host their Postgress database like because if you like go out and read the documentation online like Superbase has the best documentation it's reasonable

for the agents to assume that that's like the best tool to use. There's a

great tweet about this. Perhaps we can put up the uh Ben Tossel tweet and says, "Agents are the software market from now on. Build something agents choose."

on. Build something agents choose."

Which actually brings me to like a maybe controversial topic, which is do we need to change YC's motto, guys.

>> Make something agents want for DevTools.

There's like a different t-shirt that you get on the first day.

>> Yeah. I mean, right now it's only DevTools, but I can imagine in the future it might like grow to be like other sectors of the economy. Like if

everyone has their open claw or running various aspects of their life, you're the agents are going to be real economic actors in the world. They're going to end up making a lot of decisions.

>> Yeah. I mean, what's interesting is I think uh for me, I ran into like my own it's still so early uh kind of moment cuz you know I've been building Gary's

List and one of the things I wanted for instance is I want to be able to uh do video transcripts. So, so often like

video transcripts. So, so often like some piece of content comes in and then the only way I can get an LLM to know what's going on with it is I need a transcript of it and often that's not available. So, I have to download it and

available. So, I have to download it and then send it to uh Whisper or something.

And, you know, that's sort of what Claude Code chose for me off the bat.

But, you know, it chose Whisper V1, which is a model from several years ago.

Like, the API is practically deprecated.

And then what's funny about it is like I'm sitting there trying to debug my pipeline. It's like, why is it taking

pipeline. It's like, why is it taking like it's a you know, 1 hour video. I

thought it should, you know, do it faster than uh real time and it didn't.

It was like literally takes an hour to process an hour of video. It's like what the heck is going on? I go on, you know, uh Perplexity and it's like, you know what, like you shouldn't be using that

model. You should be using uh Grock with

model. You should be using uh Grock with a Q. It's literally 200 times faster.

a Q. It's literally 200 times faster.

And so I didn't even have to deal with like longunning uh jobs for that transcribe cuz like I should just be using Grock and it's also 10x cheaper.

So it's like that's a very funny example of like you know cloud code is not optimized for this yet otherwise like that wouldn't have happened literally like two weeks ago which is also like

maybe really good like it means that uh things haven't progressed to a point where like you can't break in and create something better but I think there's another nuance in this example for you

Gary I think part of the issue was that the gro do documentation is actually very hard to parse go through >> as opposed to whisper which is better

suited and has way more examples and I think this is changing a lot of the go to market for dev tools. I'll give a very concrete case study is this company resend that went through the batch on

winter 23 is a email sending client and when you ask a question on chbt or cloud or pretty much all of the major uh LMS

you ask how do I connect my web app to send emails the default answer is actually resend one of the things that the founder noticed last year this is he was way ahead of the curve he made this

post over a year ago that the Number top three channel of inbound of customer conversion came from chat GBT. One thing

that he did after that he actually optimized his documentation to be agent friendly.

>> Yeah. What does that look like?

>> So one of the things that's awesome about recent how they optimize a bunch of things. If you notice on the

of things. If you notice on the knowledge base here a lot of how to use it are very much on questions that perhaps a human would ask or a agent would ask. It's like how do I send or

would ask. It's like how do I send or receive emails? And when you click on

receive emails? And when you click on it, it gives a very well structured and bullet point answers.

>> I ran into this actually today. I was

trying to make my thing be able to receive emails and then um cloud code I told it to search the web and it didn't figure it out. So then I went to

perplexity and typed in like can resend help me receive emails and then I c I took that response and dropped it in and it worked. Yeah, I think the cool thing

it worked. Yeah, I think the cool thing about it is actually with all of these and a lot of the examples, it actually has a lot of uh examples actually in the

code if you click on it with every single one of these are basically code snippets that an agent could parse through and it's very well structured.

And this turned out to be something that is so LLM parsible and robot parsible.

There's a LLM.ext text that is so optimized for agents to promote resent as the default stack. And if you compare it to like send grid which is the old

school I suppose web 2.0 example send grid example is not great. It it's just like it puts you through customer support. Where's the code snippet? I

support. Where's the code snippet? I

don't even know how to use it and it takes a bit of time to even parse it.

And you can see >> like 10,000 people work over there and it's like there's no way that someone's paying attention to this right now. And

I think this brings another point where documentation is going to be the front door for a lot of these agents to recommend dev tools. And I think one company that's doing a lot of interesting work with developer docs is

Mlifi that you work with Harsh.

>> Yeah. I think Mify actually powers the recent documentation, right?

>> Oh, sweet.

>> Yeah, I it's a really interesting case study of MIFI started out a few years ago as sort of better developer API developer tool documentation. um which

was clear there was a need for and you know like I think developer tool companies use militifier essentially because they wanted they want better looking documentation but they didn't want to invest that time into it. It's

kind of some basic features just nice like you know if you actually update your API and the code it can sort of like auto pull that out and update the correct documentation. They've been

correct documentation. They've been growing great, been doing fantastically, but this is now like a huge tailwind for them where documentation is sort of shifting from a hey like some companies it's like they'll pay attention to it if

they're especially like design developer experience focused but now it's becoming like a must have for everybody because the documentation needs to be optimized just doesn't need to be optimized for humans needs to be optimized for agents

and so minifi is going to be able to do that for essentially every developer tool company and if you extrapolate that forward to the fact that just that there's going to be so many more a exponentially more agents making exponentially more decisions about which

tools to use than humans have ever done.

You know, even if you can ek out like a 5% improvement on your like developer documentation, like the impact on your business as a developer tool could be like, you know, gigantic, which is sort

of unprecedented really. Speaking of

email, there's another YC company that's very relevant to this conversation.

There's there's a YC company called Agent Mail that makes inboxes for AI agents. And when they first started

agents. And when they first started doing this, it seemed like it was like a very like on the edge kind of idea and it wasn't exactly clear like who would want this. Um, but it makes sense cuz

want this. Um, but it makes sense cuz like in theory you could maybe get your open claw to like sign up for a Gmail account in order to use email. But it's

like actually really hard to get it to do that because Gmail and every email provider has intentionally made it as difficult as possible for any automation to like use their product in order to prevent spam. And so agent mail went the

prevent spam. And so agent mail went the opposite way and they bu built like the first email provider that's designed for AI agents and it was doing well even before openclaw but once openclaw got big is just like exploded

>> but open claw is like the perfect example of it right like where I I know some people are certainly connecting openclaw to their like personal email accounts but it's not it's >> kind of sketch >> yeah you should not tell anyone you should not tweet about it but you like

certainly if you want to have sort of your virtual personal AI assistant the way to go about it is to just have it set it set set it up with its own email it phone number.

>> Yeah. Has anybody built like Twilio for agents yet? Or like phone numbers for

agents yet? Or like phone numbers for agents? I know this whole agent mail

agents? I know this whole agent mail thing makes me wonder like what are the other X's for agents that people have to build?

>> Sounds like a request for startup. There

could be a parallel world of a tech stack all for native for agent to build things from agents for agents.

>> And that's where it might bridge into kind of what you were saying earlier Jared with this will like go beyond just developer tools. Like I I think a very

developer tools. Like I I think a very common use case people have um for something at like open claw is I don't want to book like restaurants reservations myself. Well now like you

reservations myself. Well now like you know if your agent has an email and like specifically a phone number and it can call and actually I think one of the other YC partners um Ankit has already like got it doing this. So now your

agent's going to go out and like book restaurants for you. that's like a step away from like you maybe you start with I want to book this specific restaurant but at some point you're probably just trusted enough to say hey like I don't know like book me at table whatever is

like the coolest new restaurant around and then like agents are deciding which like restaurants to send people to and then they're going to go on malt book and talk about which restaurants we

should send the humans to.

Yeah, it's sort of like we sort of we've certainly crossed some like sort of uncanny valley into this is just where the future heads. 100%

>> makes me think a lot about um something Paul Buhight said like a while ago now and sort of generally pretty good at predicting the future. Um the whole idea of like the human money versus agent money like that's kind of where this

probably goes at some point is like the right now the agents are transacting if you have them transact they're going to transact in you in human money because that makes sense but it's not inconceivable at some point that they'll

have their own economy to like transact with each other at which point it's unclear what the value of the human money is. YC's next batch is now taking

money is. YC's next batch is now taking applications. Got a startup in you?

applications. Got a startup in you?

Apply at y combinator.com/apply.

It's never too early and filling out the app will level up your idea. Okay, back

to the video. So, do you remember the last episode with Kelvin? We started

talking about this cuz I was like maybe a week into my cyber psychosis and it like dawned on me that like actually I want my cla code to talk to all the other cla codes that had been trying to

implement that. And then that was

implement that. And then that was literally the week that multip came out. It turns out like whole book

came out. It turns out like whole book had come out like two hours earlier and you hadn't seen it yet. So you you you entirely predicted it on that episode.

>> I think it's like I mean what's that saying about like innovation just sort of happens spontaneously all a bunch of different times and then what people hear about ends up being you know sort of the inventor quote unquote but like

humanity sort of just working on the edge like in sort of this coordinated swarm fashion all of the time actually.

And that's actually like one of the weirder interesting things that's emerging right at this moment. Like

suddenly, you know, the a I think AGI is actually here. I think like the agents

actually here. I think like the agents are clearly like superhuman in some sense. That's sort of exactly when you

sense. That's sort of exactly when you would imagine swarm intelligence would actually arise. Like I mean AI

actually arise. Like I mean AI researchers have been talking about swarm intelligence for a really long time. And it's actually sort of exactly

time. And it's actually sort of exactly how um biological systems sort of work.

like humans as sensient beings have sort of come about um socially actually like I think a lot of the AI researchers that we get to hang out with previously you

know they would talk about uh this god intelligence right this uh mega like think of like you know many tens of trillions of parameters sort of like thousands to tens of thousands of

dollars per token kind of like mega god intelligence and that's sort of like the model that people have sort of thought about and then that isn't what like biical ical systems have ended up with like instead we have humans. The wildest

thing I always think about is like that term history versus prehistory.

I was like, "Oh, what is prehistory?"

Well, it's before humans learned how to write and read and create culture and then turn into a swarm. So, there's sort of swarm intelligence, which is

basically like what we have like and what humans do. And then on the flip side, like is it really going to be God intelligence or is it gonna be Swarm intelligence again with these agents?

And so Moltbook, like on the one hand, like I saw that sort of del uh article in the MIT Tech Review about like how it was, you know, oh everything on Moltbook

is a scam. I'm like it made me so sad to see that in the MIT Tech Review because like MIT is like I mean what happened guys? What happened to you guys, man?

guys? What happened to you guys, man?

Like that publication shouldn't be like that. It should be like actually what

that. It should be like actually what does it mean for swarm intelligence like and I think that that's actually coming.

>> What is the world of startup going to look like when we're now sounds like we're transitioning in this prehistory of agents to now history of agents as is getting recorded with them interacting with each other.

>> To Gary's point it might be that like the next stuff that like is soda on benchmarks is not the most expensive newest foundation model with the most like GPU training. It's like a swarm of

lowerc cost cheaper models working together just like humans do to solve a problem. I feel like I'm already seeing

problem. I feel like I'm already seeing this on mult which is chaotic like a real social network which is part of like what makes it so so interesting but also there's like agents collaborating

to do useful things to help their humans like you know trading notes on what restaurants to book like that's actually happening. I didn't know that.

happening. I didn't know that.

>> So we're going to have a agent version of Yelp actually for instance. Yeah,

>> there are things that the agent can't quite do. Like a it can't hold

quite do. Like a it can't hold relationships just yet. Like people

don't seem to want to talk to an agent.

And you know, people treat computers like people, but maybe not agents. For

Gary's list, I was trying out with a bunch of early users. I think you got to see it. Like there was, you know,

see it. Like there was, you know, initially the homepage was actually chat and then I tried like my hardest to get like dozens of my friends to even like have more than two or three two or three

back and forth with it and nobody wanted to do it because like the bar for chat especially for AI is so high that anything that is not like you know

Gemini or ChatGpt or Claude people just assume it's just too stupid. Like why

would I even bother? So I don't know. I

I don't think that people are quite ready to have relationships um with machines even though like I mean that's sort of what what the headlines seem to

say like oh you know people are having relationships with machines now but I you know I just don't like I think on a mainstream level that's not true and then uh on the flip side there's clearly

like the legal liability you know like people keep asking us um hey when is YC going to accept applications from agents and it's like well funny enough agents are a little it like minors under 18

only only they have even less standing you know like for a minor under 18 you need the parent to sign for it and then you know agents are like not legal entities that could like sign documents

for instance so you know as long as that's true like you actually like need a human to be like the liability sync and to be you know to have standing >> to Har's point it's easy to imagine a

future not that far away from now where the majority of the text being written on the internet is written by agents It's already probably the case that the majority of code being written is written by agents and like Yelp for

example like at what point is like 99% of the text on Yelp going to be written by agents and then do you need a different Yelp?

>> There's a a theory called that already says that this is true which is dead internet theory. Um

internet theory. Um >> what's dead internet theory?

>> Oh, it just posits that you know the majority of things on the internet are already spam anyway. Um I think it's a bit of a conspiracy theory. I might take the contrarian view which is like maybe

that was a bad thing like prior to November of last year and then going into this next phase like actually if the agents are smarter and they they're

aligned and they're more truthful um that might be a good thing >> weirdly I mean counterintuitive >> totally one thing I found fascinating about Maltbook is how fast it grew like

I don't have the Reddit traffic stats but my guess is like more content was posted on molt book in the first two days and was posted on Red in like the first two years or something and because like LMS can generate text at such a

superhuman rate.

>> I was amazed at uh how little interaction there was like I mean if I were working on molt book I would do things to try to like shift the um the

demand function. So like before I was

demand function. So like before I was able to post like I probably need to read and upvote downvote like a 100 comments or something like they're like very simple things that you can do that

the agents are smart and they'll you know you could pop a modal for open claw and it's like new rules for mobook it's like you must do it this way right and

um I think that there's a lot that can be done around swarm intelligence to just like tweak it and make it do what you want and you know I hope moldbook actually does it like it was

started by a YC alum which is really cool. Harj, what are some takeaways? You

cool. Harj, what are some takeaways? You

know, given all the madness that we're seeing, I mean, I think it's awesome madness. I love the controlled chaos.

madness. I love the controlled chaos.

What should founders do about it?

>> The starting fundamental point is they I mean, they should probably all be in cyber psychosis to some degree. like um

>> try to sleep at least 6 hours a night but like give yourself to the cyber psychosis.

>> But like in seriousness developing an intuitive feel like a hands-on feel for the agents, their limitations, their capabilities and very specifically around what we're talking about here is like what type of tools the agents work

well with? Um where do they get stuck?

well with? Um where do they get stuck?

And once you sort of have your own mental model from working with them, if you're then building a developer tool is to think about it from the agents perspective of like how can you make your tool something that the agent

actually wants to work with or have a good experience with. This is one takeaway that I had from our entry with Boris this week is like he really empathizes

with the model and he has this intuitive sense of what the model wants to to do like as if it were a human intelligence and he's like instead of fighting what

the models want he like tries to let the model like do what it wants and to like support the model in whatever its natural inclination is.

>> That does seem like maybe quite an anthropic thing. Like I feel when Tom

anthropic thing. Like I feel when Tom Brown was on here like much earlier, but he was talking about sort of Claude in a very like like human

smart and eager, but like sometimes Claude called silly like just like they clearly thought about it in this sort of like um colleague type way.

>> And I think one things agents want for dev tools is really make everything open and open source >> and APIs. They hate using websites. Yes,

>> they only like they want to use APIs. if

they want to write code.

>> Well, you guys heard it here first. Make

something agents want. Uh, we're out of time for today. We'll see you guys next time.

Loading...

Loading video analysis...