The Fat Burning Expert: The REAL Reason You’re Not Losing Belly Fat (and How To Fix It Fast!)

I asked my audience for their 15 most popular unanswered questions about how to lose fat or to gain muscle mass. The

first one, how do I lose weight fast?

But you just answered that.

>> Yeah.

>> The second one is creatine this miracle thing that everybody should be taking.

>> There's almost nothing creatine can't do.

>> Wow, some statement.

>> Next, is there any harm in eating too much protein?

>> It's rare and in fact, almost everybody who has some degree of an issue with their body fat levels under consume protein.

>> My next question is about PCOS. What

would you say to a woman struggling with PCOS in terms of dietary prescription?

>> That's a damn good question, man. Can I

go into detail with this because a lot of people are very misinformed about this stuff.

>> The floor is yours.

>> Okay, so Alan Araggon has been using science to help elite athletes unlock peak performance for over 30 years.

>> And now he's breaking down the nutrition and training strategies that actually deliver results. It's important to take

deliver results. It's important to take an evidence-based approach to diet, nutrition training supplementation because if you don't, then you end up wasting a lot of time.

>> So, let's start with protein. So, how

much protein should I be eating to gain muscle?

>> What is your goal body weight? It's

>> around 90.

>> Take 90 and multiply that by there's your protein target.

>> What about calorie restriction? I've

heard you say that 10 or 20% of your calories can come from pretty much anything you want.

>> Literally anything.

>> So, I could eat McDonald's or something and I could still lose weight theoretically.

>> That's true. And this is reflected in research along with diet breaks. That's

one of the tactics that you can use for long-term adherence to a plan. And I'll

explain how.

>> I also want to talk about the ketogenic diet menopause fasting sugars and this >> that that always gets me, man. That that

picture always gets me.

>> Why?

>> I used to drink heavily. I was

overworked and trying to be the best father and the best husband.

And it got real bad.

I just needed to stop and I did. How?

>> I just >> Wow. Really?

>> Wow. Really?

>> Yes.

>> I see messages all the time in the comments section that some of you didn't realize you didn't subscribe. So, if you could do me a favor and double check if you're a subscriber to this channel, that would be tremendously appreciated.

It's the simple, it's the free thing that anybody that watches this show frequently can do to help us here to keep everything going in this show in the trajectory it's on. So please do double check if you've subscribed and uh

thank you so much because a strange way you are you're part of our history and you're on this journey with us and I appreciate you for that. So yeah, thank you Alan.

Why should I listen to you? What have

you done in your career over the last 30 years that has given you the knowledge, the information, the wisdom that you have on nutrition, dieting, fitness, etc.

Who is Allan?

>> I have over 30 years of experience in the field. The first 10 years consisted

the field. The first 10 years consisted of personal training. The second decade of my career was nutritional counseling.

Just counseling people on on how to eat, what to eat. And then the third decade of my career, which actually running on 13 years now, is the research and

education side. My colleagues and I, we

education side. My colleagues and I, we in quotes do the science. We published

the science. I've been a part of 30 30 publications, >> 30 studies.

>> Yeah. Yeah. A combination of narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and metaanalyses and randomized control trials.

>> And how many people have you worked with directly over the last 30 years in terms of in your your nutritional counseling role, but also as a as a trainer?

Individually it's it's triple digits. Groups

potentially quadruple. Yeah.

>> And some of those people that you've worked with over the years are fairly high-profile.

>> Yeah. Individuals.

>> Yeah. Probably my

most interesting story is getting an email from Steve Austin and and the wrestling fans know him as Stone Cold Steve Austin. In so many words, he said,

Steve Austin. In so many words, he said, "Hey, Allan, I've been I've been doing my research and you're you're the guy, so I want to work

with you. Um, I know that you mentioned

with you. Um, I know that you mentioned that you're not working with clients, but could you please make an exception for me? Here's my number."

for me? Here's my number."

>> What did you do with him with Stone? I

helped him get his nutrition right for his uh in quotes uh come back to television.

It was mainly focused on primarily fat loss.

>> And you worked with Derek Fischer as well, who's the five-time NBA champion.

>> Yes.

>> The longtime LA Lakers player.

>> Yeah.

>> And Pete Sampas, the former world number one tennis player and grand slam champion.

>> Yeah. Pete Sandra. That's right.

When people come to you and when they message you and DM you, there's probably similar themes. Similar themes as to

similar themes. Similar themes as to like what they're trying to accomplish and what their goal is. If you just from the top of your head had to state the most popular themes that people are trying to accomplish.

What are they?

>> How to improve body composition.

>> What does that mean?

>> How to lose fat and or gain muscle.

One of the things that I'm I'm particularly intrigued by which kind of dubtales into both of those subjects of fat and muscle gain is the subject of

protein and um because there's been so much said about protein. You know, when I was growing up, they said you have to have protein right after you eat your meal. You have to have this much

meal. You have to have this much protein. You have to have it before you

protein. You have to have it before you eat your meal. It doesn't matter when you have it. So, I want to do a bit of myth busting on the subject of protein.

What are what are the biggest myths that people currently believe about protein consumption?

>> The biggest myth is that they have the hierarchy of importance all screwed up.

Like everybody's worried about how much protein per meal you need to have for this or that goal. When do you need to time protein relative to the training bout or waking or sleeping or all that

stuff. The main thing they need to be

stuff. The main thing they need to be focused on is how much protein do they need to eat by the end of the day?

Because when you hit that goal, you've basically won the whole game. The the

relative placement, the distribution, and the doses of the protein, the timing of it, oh man, it rarely matters. It

rarely matters beyond getting that protein in in a way that's comfortable and convenient for you. and

in such a way that you can stick to in the long term. Some people are more like grazers, some people are more like gorgers.

They're both fine as long as you hit the total by the end of the day. So the

hierarchy is of utmost importance. Get

your total daily protein.

>> And then of secondary importance would be what is the distribution of the constituent doses of that protein total through the day. And then a third importance down here is like when

specifically are you supposed to time that protein around the the the training bout. So So yeah, the what the way that

bout. So So yeah, the what the way that I put it is like this. The daily total for protein that is the cake. The

distribution of the doses through the day that's the icing on the cake. And it's a very thin layer of icing.

>> And how do we know that? How do we know that it doesn't really matter what time you have the protein and that the most important thing is just making sure you get the protein?

>> That's a great question. The reason that we know that distribution doesn't matter as much as the total is through a couple lines of evidence that I can think of.

So there's Yasuda who who compared a three meal model with a two meal model.

And the three meal model had superior effects for uh for muscle gain.

But there is a study that was just published gosh within the last month. It

was better from a methodology standpoint because they fed the subjects an abundance of protein. So Yasuda and college who and colleagues who tested

the two versus three, he totaled everybody out at 1.3 g per kilogram of body weight per day. That's the total daily protein dose. And so we know now

that that's a suboptimal total if you want to push muscle growth. So for

pushing muscle growth, we know you you should be at 1.6 g per kilogram of body weight, which translates to 7 g per pound of body weight. That's where you

really want to be if you want to maximize muscular adaptations to resistance training like muscle size and strength

gains. So this latest study, they

gains. So this latest study, they compared three uh three protein feedings versus five

protein feedings. And the totals of

protein feedings. And the totals of protein intake in the day in both groups were around a gram per pound. So right

around 2.2ish grams per kilogram of body weight. So we have the optimized daily

weight. So we have the optimized daily total and we're testing three versus five protein feedings. were doing

progressive resistance training and this is the key. This happened in resistance trained subjects. There were no

trained subjects. There were no significant differences as m in muscle size and strength gain between the three protein feedings a day versus five

protein feedings a day. And this is the best designed study to date on the on the topic. And and so

the topic. And and so >> because when I grew up and read stuff about gaining muscle, it said you have to have like five or six meals a day.

Mhm. Um I said that's what bodybuilders do.

>> Whenever we we talk about any kind of physical goal, any any sort of fitness goal, we have to address two main things. So who's the who's the

population and what goal are we talking about? And

maybe a third thing we need to address is what is at stake? So what level are we talking about? So population goal, what level? What's at stake? So with

what level? What's at stake? So with

bodybuilders at elite levels it is most of them consume

five six meals a day. Some of them do like even seven or eight in the offseason.

And these are individuals who are enhanced and so their ceiling for muscle growth and their rates of muscle muscle growth are significantly higher than

people who are in quotes natural.

And the amount of food that these individuals can process and use productively is significantly more. And

so with that population, I can see it being pretty standard for them to be consuming at least five, six meals a day

since they tend to have since they tend to be eating double the amount of of the average person.

>> And so, but the interesting thing that happens is that the guidelines from this very sort of fringe elite population, that's what trickles down into the general public. and then they're stuck

general public. and then they're stuck thinking, okay, maybe I need to eat every 2.5 hours or or some such.

>> But yeah, with the with the general population and even um recreational athletes and people who are hobbyists and and stuff, you really

the impact of actual protein distribution is inconsequential compared to the total.

>> So, how much protein should I be eating a day? because I think you disagree with

a day? because I think you disagree with the recommended daily sort of allowance that they suggest we eat as um I think I'm 90 kg.

>> Mhm.

>> How much protein should I be eating to gain muscle, lean muscle mass?

>> Okay. So, we're going to apply you to the population and the goal and the stakes questions. So, what would you say

stakes questions. So, what would you say your training status is? You're

obviously not a beginner.

Um, so you're somewhere between intermediate and advanced.

>> Mhm.

>> Right.

>> Yeah.

>> So, what is your goal?

>> Just to lose fat and gain muscle.

>> Okay.

>> Familiar story, I'm sure.

>> Okay. The way that I do it is I go 1.6 to 2.2 g per kilogram of target body weight or goal body weight.

>> Mhm.

>> So, that's the range that you would be looking at. Now, with you in particular,

looking at. Now, with you in particular, I would go more towards the upper end because you mentioned that you part of

your goal is to decrease body fat to a to a minor degree, >> but you're still you're pushing the envelope because you're already lean.

>> Mhm.

>> So, there's an interesting thing about high balling protein that facilitates that uh reduction in body fat.

If I have a lot of protein, it helps to reduce body fat.

>> Yeah. Yeah, it does. And the way that we know this is because there have been several studies now, four trials, one

case study um by Joey Antonio and colleagues, and they examine the effect of very high protein

intakes anywhere from about 3.3 all the way to 4.4 four gram per kilogram of body weight roughly. Gosh, you know, a gram and a half to two grams per pound.

>> Is that because you're eating less carbohydrates? You're sort of

carbohydrates? You're sort of substituting it for something else essentially in terms of you feeling hungry. So, if I'm having 3.3 g of

hungry. So, if I'm having 3.3 g of protein, I'm probably not going to be having something else which is more fatty.

>> Yeah, that's right. That's right. So

this particular line of research was done on people who were resistance training and it was done in free living conditions and they just gave them the

assignment to essentially increase their their protein intake by 50%.

and literally add 80 to 100 grams of protein on top of their existing habitual dietary intakes.

>> So, what would you say to me then? You'd

say push even higher in terms of grams per kilogram of body weight.

>> What is your goal body weight?

>> I don't actually have a goal body weight to be honest. I just have more of a a goal in terms of like strength.

>> How about this? Were you ever in the shape that you are wanting to be in? And

what what was your body weight at that time?

>> I was around 90. I think I was just a little bit below 90 kg. So I think I was about 88.

>> Okay. So you know what? Let's let's take 90.

>> Yeah.

>> And multiply that by 2.2.

>> 90 time 2.2.

>> There's your protein target.

>> 198 >> grams of protein a day. So, if my if a protein shake gives me 20 grams of protein, I I need to have basically 10 g 10 protein shakes a day. That's seems

like a lot of protein.

>> That is a lot of protein. Uh I I would give a little caveat here. You can

probably achieve your your goal >> with 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight. So,

that would be the lower end. So,

multiply 90 by 1.6. six.

>> Mhm.

>> And that's where you can start. So if if that 198 number seems kind of far-fetched or even a little bit like, hm, how how would I even achieve that?

Then start off at the lower end.

>> Do women have a different prescription in this regard? Is there a different approach if you're a woman?

>> Yeah. If you're a woman, you would almost always start at the low end because women have a higher proportion of body fat and and by default, they have a lower proportion of lean mass. So

with women it would almost always be all right let's start at 1.6 grams per kilogram of target body weight and see how you do with that and we can always ratchet it up if needed.

>> Is there any such harm in eating too much protein?

>> It's rare. Uh you would have to have a pre-existing chronic kidney disease and then it's generally not a good thing to

be highballing the protein. Um, but even people with chronic kidney disease have to realize the trade-off that they're incurring with a low protein diet and

older age sarcopenia and stuff. How are

they going to mitigate that? But for the general healthy population, there have been many studies that have rolled out looking at effects on kidney

function, liver function, bone health, and there is virtually zero threat to those organ systems that that you would

think might be threatened by a high protein intake. So the human organism

protein intake. So the human organism perfectly well equipped to metabolize and handle high protein amounts. And not

all protein is equal, I guess, because you've got you've got these animal proteins and then plant proteins um that come from things like eggs and so on.

What is the best type of protein, do you think? Is there such a thing?

think? Is there such a thing?

I think that the best thing you can do is get a mix of different types of protein. It is true that gram for gram

protein. It is true that gram for gram generally speaking animal proteins are more in quotes anabolic than plant proteins meaning that they stimulate a

greater growth response >> of muscle >> at the muscle level. So they stimulate muscle protein synthesis more potently than plant proteins.

And there are there's maybe one exception to that that we know of which is mop protein which is a fungusbased protein that actually outperformed milk protein

for stimulating muscle protein synthesis. So there's interesting

synthesis. So there's interesting exceptions like that but generally speaking animal proteins are better for muscle protein synthesis than plant

proteins. Now, with that said, Stephen,

proteins. Now, with that said, Stephen, once you consume a certain amount of total daily protein, then it doesn't appear to matter how much of your

protein is animal-based versus how much your pro your protein is plant-based. If

we're looking at things like muscle size and strength gain because this has been actually compared in controlled

interventions where um vegan group has been compared with an omnivore group and total daily protein was optimized at 1.6 g per kilogram of body weight per day

or.7 g per pound in both groups.

or.7 g per pound in both groups.

Progressive resistance training for 12 weeks. no significant differences

weeks. no significant differences between groups in muscle size and strength gain whether it was a omnivorous protein intake or whether it was a plant-based protein intake and we have two studies showing that now

>> you must have so many moments where you're working with someone through your career who's got a goal and he feels like they just can't accomplish it where you find yourself saying the same thing

over and over again to people about how to lose fat or to gain muscle mass is that same thing just to have more protein.

>> It's a common thing with the general population, with the lay public. Like my

my protein target is at least 160 grams a day. So,

a day. So, I just make sure that I have four meals with at least 40 g of protein per day.

And it's so easy to do. It's incredibly

easy to do because two of my meals per day are just real whole foods. And then

two of my meals per day, two to three, are protein smoothies. And so, uh, it is just so incredibly easy for me to to get my protein intake through. Like two

scoops of protein, bam, that's almost 50 grams of protein right there. Right

there. So, you have two of those a day, I've got more than half my protein covered.

>> But if I if I have all of my protein in one meal, >> Mhm.

>> is that going to impact my ability to gain muscle or lose fat if I have it all in one meal? If I just have like one massive protein shake, if I put like five scoops. Now, if you were telling

five scoops. Now, if you were telling me, "Hey, Allan, I want to place really good in the Nationals this year, the NPC

Nationals, classic classic physique or, you know, classic bodybuilding or just any one of the physique divisions, I would say, you know, you you are not

going to want to try to get all your protein in a single meal because what we want to do is we want to maximize the number of microanabolic

events in the course of the day. We want

to maximize the amount of times you maximally stimulate muscle protein synthesis in the course of the day. And

just from a a pragmatic standpoint, you could probably do that at least three or four times. And if you're able to do

four times. And if you're able to do that three or four times in a day versus once with that one big banger of a meal, then you might actually over time gain

more muscle than you would have. And

this could make the difference between placings at the end of the uh end of the prep period. So, but as somebody in the

prep period. So, but as somebody in the general population, theoretically you could >> I am going to challenge you to do

something here. I asked my audience

something here. I asked my audience about weight loss and asked them for their 15 most popular questions that are currently unanswered for them.

>> All right.

>> About weight loss.

>> The first one was, "How do I lose weight fast?"

fast?" >> So essentially, you can engage what would could be classified as a as a

as a protein sparing modified fast.

You're basically crash dieting. Um,

I don't love doing that though, honestly.

>> Listen, I've got a wedding. I need to I need to lose weight fast. How do I lose weight fast?

>> Losing weight fast. So, you would basically do an aggressive caloric deficit. So, anywhere I I would say

deficit. So, anywhere I I would say 20% below your maintenance needs. 20 to

possibly 40 depending on the individual percent below your maintenance needs.

And then keep the protein high. And this

is going to default you to relatively low carbohydrate, relatively low fat, and just train regularly. Don't hurt

yourself. Um,

>> protein high, you said.

>> Yeah, protein high. And calories wise, so for example, if you maintained at we we'll just take a round number, 2,000 calories. So you

would just lop off about a third of that and then just go and see if you can maintain your fat loss while maintaining

strength levels relatively. You're it's

almost inevitable to crash diet and uh lose some strength in the process. But I

mean we're we're talking about something that's not an optimal process. But yeah,

that that's that's the game basically.

Aggressive caloric deficit, keep protein very high and then you just go and the deficit could be anywhere from 500 to a,000ish calories below what you normally take in.

>> The second one is why do I regain weight after stopping a Zmpeek, WGO, etc. All right. So those GLP-1

All right. So those GLP-1 RAS, the recep GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs like WGOI,

they have um at least three different mechanisms that all converge towards almost nullifying your your hunger and

your appetite response. And so when you cut out the drug, then your normal appetite comes back.

And an unfortunate reality for a lot of uh GLP1 users when they get off the drug is they just don't have the habits and they

don't have the skills necessarily to maintain their weight loss. And of

course, once again, they're fighting their appetite. So I would say

their appetite. So I would say perhaps try um a weaning off process instead of just a jumping off process. A

weaning off process where you are reinforcing countermeasures to overeating, where you are reinforcing good training habits and good dietary

habits. And we're al where you're also

habits. And we're al where you're also progressively learning how to live with and deal with sensations of hunger

between meals. and just train those

between meals. and just train those habits in. And uh it can be done. I I I

habits in. And uh it can be done. I I I I'm not one of the people in the camp who says it's impossible to get off of a weight loss drug successfully.

>> So number three again is is my metabolism damaged after dieting? And

they're asking a question here about something called adaptive thermogenesis.

>> Yeah. Okay. So this is not really a short shot here. So the the process of metabolic adaptation is kind of complex and it happens in both directions

whether you try to gain weight or whether you try to lose weight. So

earlier we talked about uh an increase in non exercise activity thermogenesis or NEAt an increase in NEAt in response

to an increase in calories. So that

occurs and across studies. I I gave an example that showed a 336 calorie increase in NEAt when a thousand calories were stacked on top of people's

maintenance. But there are other studies

maintenance. But there are other studies where the caloric increase was not quite that aggressive. And so so on average

that aggressive. And so so on average increases in NEAT or non-ex exercise activity thermogenesis are about 2 to 300

calories. So you increase your energy

calories. So you increase your energy expenditure about two to 300 calories if you're overeating.

>> Yeah. So your body will start to twitch more and move more burning more non-active calories. That's correct.

non-active calories. That's correct.

>> When you're overeating. Yeah. So that's

an that's an adaptation.

>> That that's the adaptation in the caloric surplus side. So in the caloric deficit side, it's just the opposite thing, just the

mirror of it. So people decrease their non-ex exercise activity thermogenesis or their need. They decrease it on average like two to threeish hundred calories.

>> Okay.

>> As a result of dieting. So this is part of a metabolic adaptation that occurs with dieting.

>> Is this why people don't think the calories in calories out system is working for them sometimes? because they

don't realize that if they're in a calorie deficit, sometimes they are subconsciously moving around less, which means that they're burning less calories. Um, so actually they're not in

calories. Um, so actually they're not in a calorie deficit.

>> Yes, that's correct. So with the dieting side of things, which is much more of a public health issue, weight loss is is much more of a a necessity than the weight gain.

It's it's tougher for most people because in addition to the decrease in non-ex exercise activity that'll cost people two to 300ish calories that they're no longer uh no longer burning

at the end of the dieting cycle. Then

you've got what's called adaptive thermo reduction.

Okay. So you mentioned adaptive thermogenesis.

Technically that is the there's non-shivering adaptive thermogenesis and there's shivering adaptive thermogenesis. But that all has to do

thermogenesis. But that all has to do with increases in energy expenditure in response to cold environments. So that's

technically that's what adaptive thermogenesis is. It's an increase in

thermogenesis is. It's an increase in energy expenditure. When people diet,

energy expenditure. When people diet, there's something called adaptive thermo reduction.

And that is that part of it is a decrease in non-ex exercise activity thermogenesis.

>> You're you're basically saying that the body changes when we're in a calorie deficit.

>> It stops doing as much.

>> Yes. That's the activity part.

>> Yeah.

>> But then there's also the metabolic part. So we've got a decrease in non-ex

part. So we've got a decrease in non-ex exercise activity.

>> Yeah.

>> Then we have adaptive thermo reduction which has to do with a a metabolic component that has to do with the sympathetic nervous system and also

potentially thyroid output as well. So

there's this metabolic change that goes on and there's behavioral or activity change that goes on. So when people say I've got a slow metabolism, >> they might be telling the truth.

>> When people say I have a slow metabolism, what's usually happening is they have a pretty massive drop in NEAT or non-ex exercise activity to the order

of 2 to 300 calories. Now adaptive

thermo reduction is another 50 to 100 calories.

>> Okay? So, we're looking at in the neighborhood of like possibly three 400 calories that they're no longer burning

as a result of the dieting process. Now,

if you take somebody with um clinically diagnosed hypothyroidism, then their resting metabolic rate could be 7 to 10% lower than somebody without

a thyroid issue. So you add another one to 200 calories less burned over here.

Then you have the potential for five to 600 calories of energy expenditure that this person is challenged with uh at the end of their dieting cycle. So they're

>> so I guess it is kind of true in a in a way that people understand it that if you overeat your metabolism as far as they understand what their metabolism is is increasing and if you undereat then

your metabolism is slowing down.

>> Yes. But I have to emphasize the major component that slows down is your non exercise activity.

>> You're not moving around as much.

>> Yes. the other components like adaptive thermal reduction and potential thyroid issues. That is the minor component. The

issues. That is the minor component. The

major component is a drop in fidgeting, a slowing of the rate that you walk around, an increase in the amount you sit around, >> and you can control that.

>> Yes, it's it's hard to put a put a finger on it, but as long as you know that stuff goes down, I give you an example of uh physique competitors.

They are as their cutting cutting phase progresses, they're literally lying around in between their cardio sessions

and their resistance training sessions and their Tupperware meal sessions.

>> Okay? They're no longer tapping their heads bo, you know, tapping their fingers and bobbing their heads and they're no longer have a pep in their step. They're no longer doing non

step. They're no longer doing non exercise activities, basically. Question

four, what diet actually works best for long-term weight loss? Keto, low-fat,

Mediterranean, intermittent fasting. And

you got to give me a answer.

I'll say it in one sentence.

The diet with enough protein, enough total calories that is comprised predominantly of healthy food choices

that fits the individual's personal preferences and tolerances.

>> How do I lose belly fat specifically?

Can you target the belly?

Targeting belly fat specifically is a matter of targeting total body fat. You

can't necessarily spot reduce the the belly fat. Now, if

we're go a layer deeper, it is possible for certain diets to be more conducive to preventing visceral fat gain or maybe even accelerating visceral fat loss.

Visceral fat is the fat uh in the within the abdominal cavity around the the organs. And so it is possible for

organs. And so it is possible for certain diets to be more conducive to reductions in visceral fat. And that

would be diets that have a lower proportion of saturated fat, >> which is what's what's an example of a saturated fat food?

>> Land fatty land animal meats. So land

animal fats are going to be your saturated fats that are more conducive to visceral fat gain. So if you were to switch out, let's say fatty cuts of meat, just trim that fat out and if you

replaced it with something like avocado nuts, olive oil, seeds >> on menopause, why is fat loss harder and what actually works?

>> Okay. During the menopausal transition, which begins at a woman's mid-40s on average and then ends in in the mid-50s, there are changes physiologically and

hormonally that can challenge a fitness program.

So, it can challenge their ability to execute the fitness program and adhere to it. And so things like hot flashes

to it. And so things like hot flashes and joint pain, changes in sexual function

and poor sleep.

All of those things can converge to lead to a a decreased ability to stick to a program and do the necessary

physical activity and dietary adherence to reach the sort of the standard rate of progress for body composition change.

And so the solution to that would be simply you don't have to rearrange a whole program because somebody's going through menopause. You don't have to cut

through menopause. You don't have to cut out nutrients and do any special things.

What has been effective is just lowering the expectation of progress. So whereas

I would typically have somebody gun for a pound a week of fat loss, somebody in the menopausal transition, they have more challenges to that going on

simultaneously. So we would go for about

simultaneously. So we would go for about half of that >> protein.

What do what do they do in terms of protein? Just keep the protein high.

protein? Just keep the protein high.

>> Same range. Yeah. So, with protein, I got to say there's sort of a two-tiered recommendation. So, the general public

recommendation. So, the general public with average goals >> Mhm.

>> will do just fine on 1.2 to 1.6 g per kilogram of body weight. That's kind of like the general population average goal, folks. somebody like yourself, uh,

goal, folks. somebody like yourself, uh, somebody like me and folks who are oriented towards maybe pushing the envelope a little bit more than the

average 1.6 to 2.2 g per kilogram of body weight. And you know, there's a little

weight. And you know, there's a little margin over here for people on the fringe physique competitors who I would have no problem seeing them go higher

than that 2.2 g per kilogram cut off. Is

there anything else that Perry or menopause or women need to understand about gaining muscle and keeping fat off when they're going

through menopause? Is there anything

through menopause? Is there anything else that we've missed?

>> You know, I I would just emphasize the understanding that midlife presents maybe the highest point of uh psychological stress in in people's

lives. So starting from the late 40s

lives. So starting from the late 40s going all the way into people's 50s and 60s it's it's like that you know the concentrated period in the menopausal

transition mid-40s to mid-50s is when people are dealing with ailing parents the stress of ailing parents the stress of kids going through high school or

college. The stress of hitting a high

college. The stress of hitting a high point in their careers. The pressures

thereof. the time and the energy that is necessary to allocate for all of those things.

>> Mhm.

>> All of those things distract from, oh, I've got a fitness program here. Oh, my

coach is making me do this and this and this and now he's making me diet like this.

That's the thing that I I would emphasize. There's nothing special or

emphasize. There's nothing special or different that needs to be done. And in

fact, there's a lot of mythology that's circulating the space right now where coaches and gurus and even some physicians are telling women that they

are just doomed to gain a bunch of belly fat and lose a bunch of muscle during menopause. It just happens. You're

menopause. It just happens. You're

doomed. Well, that's just not true. Uh

there is a study called the Swan study.

That's the longest and largest study of its kind. And the average amount of fat

its kind. And the average amount of fat gain during the entire menopausal transition was 1.6 kilograms which is 3 and a half pounds. And the average

amount of muscle loss total during the menopausal transition was 0.2 kg. That's

about half half a pound of muscle loss.

Statistically significant? Yes.

Insurmountable? No. So, and are there going to be outliers who experience double the muscle loss and double the fat gain of that? Yes.

But none of this is insurmountable.

>> What do you think about taking is it HRT? Does that help?

HRT? Does that help?

>> Yeah. Well, well, it it helps those who need it. So, HRT should be looked at on

need it. So, HRT should be looked at on an individual basis. One of the things that really annoys the absolute crap out of me is when I'm seeing the comment sections on social media with people

telling everybody that, "Hey, you just turned 40. time to go on HRT.

turned 40. time to go on HRT.

That is between you and your doctor.

People are trying to universalize major changes like HRT.

Some people definitely benefit from it.

And just the same, there are a lot of people who don't need it.

>> The people that benefit from it, do they find it easier to gain muscle mass and to not gain fat? Is that kind of like what >> that is a common

>> Okay. That is a common result. Yes. But

>> Okay. That is a common result. Yes. But

my thing with HRT is is this. So

there has to be a symptomologic reason to get on it. So you have to be incurring or experiencing symptoms that are disrupting to your

quality of life.

>> Mhm. Regardless of what your blood labs are, like for testosterone for example, if you are out of range for testosterone on the lower end, let's say, but you

have no symptoms and you feel fine, you perform great in all aspects, then it's really up to you whether it bugs you enough that you're below range or lower

on the lower end of the range um to correct that. It it's up to you. And so

correct that. It it's up to you. And so

symptomologically driven. Now the other thing to look at with HRT is and a lot of people they get a single testing point and they judge their need to get

on hormonal replacement therapy based on a single single test.

What people need to do is see whether there is some sort of trend going on in one direction or another or not. And if

that trend is going in a bad direction over time, and you you can do this by just multiple time points over over an extended period, it's debatable, like 6 months, 12 months to see what's going

on. Try to correct things through

on. Try to correct things through lifestyle and diet. And often they are correctable. Um,

correctable. Um, I've just I've come across many cases where a guy will be underslept,

overworked, eating like crap, gets his testosterone levels tested. Oh, you're

right at the bottom or you're even below range. Oh, time for HRT. Well, hold on a

range. Oh, time for HRT. Well, hold on a second. Let's get this guy some sleep.

second. Let's get this guy some sleep.

Let's improve his lifestyle, improve body composition, and then bang, testosterone levels double. This is not

an uncommon thing. And so I'm very much a proponent of first, are there symptoms driving the justification for HRT? And then

secondly, are we basing things on a single time point or did we actually see a trend over time?

>> My next question is about PCOS. Mhm.

>> A lot of women are struggling with PCOS and that's causing them to have irregular menstrual cycles and um fertility issues.

What would you say to a woman who is struggling with PCOS in terms of dietary prescription?

>> Okay. So PCOS shares a lot of metabolic characteristics with type 2 diabetes.

So um there is insulin resistance going on there. There is impaired glycemic

on there. There is impaired glycemic control going on. And so we can pretty much justify being cautious with total

amount of carbohydrate intake with um PCOS.

With type 2 diabetes there's two tiers of importance dietarily. So of first importance with type two diabetes, you have to structure the diet so that it

allows body fat loss. The success of GLP-1 drugs has actually proven that at the heart of type 2 diabetes is overeating

uh an abundance of body fat. So the way that type 2 diabetes happens is in genetically predisposed individuals they gain total body fat and then they gain

visceral fat an undue amount of visceral fat and then this leads to insulin resistance and impairment of glycemic control.

So PCOS is is very similar in this regard. uh there is no standard or

regard. uh there is no standard or consensusbased PCOS diet protocol, but because it shares so many similar characteristics with type 2 diabetes,

then we can pretty much employ the same principles of how we would intervene with type two diabetes, which would number one put a priority on total body fat reduction. And then tier number two

fat reduction. And then tier number two would be all right, do we need to restrict carbohydrates even further? And

so that would be very similar with with PCOS. And at kind of a population level

PCOS. And at kind of a population level with type two diabetes, roughly 130ish grams of carbohydrates a day seems to be sort of the sweet spot

uh below which people have an easier time controlling their blood sugar than above that total amount. But that's just a statistical average. We still have to look at things case by case.

>> My girlfriend, she um has PCOS and she did the ketogenic diet with me. She's on

it at the moment. We've been doing it for about eight weeks now. Mhm.

>> We we do it intermittently throughout the years. Um and she said her menstrual

the years. Um and she said her menstrual cycle has perfectly corrected itself. I

think at its maximum it was like 60 days her menstrual cycle >> and then because she's restricted her carbohydrates as you were saying in in in this way using keto it's it's like she said it's perfect. It's like

perfectly predictable now.

>> That's awesome. I I I say that in part because people I think people don't with PCOS who have irregular menstrual cycles don't often consider that carbohydrates sugar glucose whatever

could be the perpetrator.

>> Yeah. Yeah. Well,

>> because it's framed as a disease like you you were born with it. Maybe it's

heritable. Maybe there's an element of truth to that. But um it's crazy that that dietary intervention had such a profound impact on her in particular.

>> It's glad to hear that you found something that works. That's yeah that's an you know that's anytime you present >> with some sort of clinical condition I

would first tell you hey see see an endocrinologist or see a doctor who specializes in that particular issue >> and in terms of menstrual cycles

generally if you do have an irregular menstrual cycle is there anything you should be thinking about >> number one see a doctor number two consider whether or not you are

overtraining and undereating >> so what happens happens with female physique competitors.

Menstrual disruption, menstrual cessation a few months into prep, sometimes even a few weeks in a prep, depending on how aggressive the diet is.

And so the menstrual disruption is very common in competitive athletes and in recreational athletes who have to maintain a certain level of leanness

while maintaining a high volume of exercise output. Is that the body from

exercise output. Is that the body from an evolutionary perspective saying, "Listen, we we don't have the energy to have a baby here, so we're just going to shut this down."

>> That is right on. Yeah.

>> So, you kind of do you don't want to be restricting your calorie consumption too much if you have an irregular menstrual cycle and you're trying to correct that.

>> Yeah. No. No. Um, the so-called female athlete triad begins with overtraining, undereating, potential eating disorder, nurturing going on there. And then down

the line, the menstrual cycle gets disrupted and stops. And then hormonal changes happen that are negative. And

then that ultimately results in osteopenia, osteoporosis.

And so that chain of events is unfortunately really common with women who um don't pay attention to a healthy menstrual cycle.

>> People use this term all the time, muscle memory. Mhm. Uh I thought it was

muscle memory. Mhm. Uh I thought it was nonsense, but I spoke to someone the other day and they said to me, "Actually, no, your your body does have a muscle memory, which means that if I

fall off now uh and I stop going to the gym, my body is going to be able to get back to my current physique faster because I was here once upon a time.

>> Is this is this true?"

>> That is true. There's some debate going on amongst the community what what goes on physiologically with like when you train you create you create new myoule

so you increase your so-called myionuclear domains and those stay relatively permanent even during times of dtraining

but there's still the so-called proprioceptive or motor component to training that sticks with people sort of the skill aspect of it that sticks with

people to be able to execute the movements and do the things to cause the adaptations. So, not only do you have

adaptations. So, not only do you have that muscle memory from the myionuclear domain standpoint, but you have the motor learning, the neurological

component, and to a degree you you also have the skeletal component to be able to capacitate those that rebound in loading and muscle gain, muscle regain rather.

>> Is the gut microbiome playing a role in my ability to lose weight?

Not a big one. Um, of course, if I >> Why did you make that sound?

>> Well, there's some people in the space who put the microbiome a as the master regulator everything, but it's

definitely a part of the the axis of organ systems that that manifest whatever, you know, result we're looking at. It's part of it. Yes.

at. It's part of it. Yes.

But it's not the the it's not the main puppeteer of everything. everything

works in concert to and and I'll just give you an example there. So,

there are certain supplements that are um that are claimed to be able to in quotes fix the gut microbiome and cause greater weight loss. So, there have been many

weight loss. So, there have been many studies looking at this sort of phenomenon.

And while there is a statistically significant effect in some cases, the absolute amount that they can help for things like body fat loss or body weight

loss is usually not practically significant. It's it's too small to be

significant. It's it's too small to be considered meaningful. And so I wouldn't

considered meaningful. And so I wouldn't necessarily rely on changes in the gut microbiome for impacting like global

changes in body fat.

Here I have 20 eggs. I heard that you eat 20 eggs per week, which is about, you know, four eggs a day potentially.

Why do you eat so many eggs?

>> Well, number one, I'm one of those weirdos who actually loves eggs. I love

I love the taste of them. Um, they're a great source of protein. Uh, decent

source of fat, most of the fat, and there is oleic acid, by the way, which is a monounsaturate that predominates olive oil. It's a low saturated fat

olive oil. It's a low saturated fat thing. Of course, the knock on eggs is

thing. Of course, the knock on eggs is their cholesterol content. Um, but

interestingly, uh, it's dietary saturated fat that has the greater magnitude of impact on blood lipids than than dietary cholesterol. Interestingly

enough, I recognize that the major health agencies would want you to stop your egg consumption to like one a day, possibly two a day if you're an elderly

person. But I

person. But I take the uh health agencies um or even the consensus guidelines as a okay, that's cool. That's good starting point.

that's cool. That's good starting point.

Um I happen to like eggs. I'll eat more than that. Check my blood. Check my

than that. Check my blood. Check my

health. I'm doing just fine. So, I'm one of those people who can do four eggs a day just fine.

>> Is this part of your broader testosterone protocol?

>> I I like the fact that uh eggs are conducive to testosterone production.

>> So, you're 53 years old, right?

>> Yes.

>> Do you test your testosterone levels? I

have not tested my testosterone levels in forever, but I'm not concerned with it because once again, it would be a symptom-driven thing for me to even

care. So, if I was experiencing the

care. So, if I was experiencing the symptoms of low testosterone, then that would give me a reason to check it out and see what's going on. And then I would have to take a step back and look

and see what can I modify with lifestyle. What what do I have available

lifestyle. What what do I have available to change non-drug-wise? And you know what? If I

non-drug-wise? And you know what? If I

ever need to take exogenous testosterone, if that day ever comes, well, then so be it. I'm just not there.

>> What supplements do you take every day?

>> I take a multivitamin. I take two multivitamins, actually. Uh the reason

multivitamins, actually. Uh the reason why I take two multivitamins is because really certain key uh nutrients in there, they they have to be in such small

amounts per single pill that it's really just meaningless. And so I take two

just meaningless. And so I take two multivitamins, one of them with iron, one of them without iron. And I also

take fish oil, uh I take magnesium, and I take vitamin D3. I take vitamin C. And

and by the way, I really should preface this with this is the bro science side of my personal habits because I'm taking my vitamins more on uh placing your bets

basis rather than hey man this is just the bottom line evidence-based. I think

everybody should do this. Okay. So I

want I want to make sure that's clear. I

also take magnesium and I also take collagen and I also take creatine. If I

told you you could only take three of those supplements, which three would you pick?

>> That's a damn good question, man. Can I

have uh can can I'm going to count my two multis as one.

>> So, your multivitamin would be would that be the first one?

>> Yes.

>> Okay. So, multivitamin

>> and omega-3s, the fish oil, vitamin D3.

>> So, you've you've sacked off the creatine.

[Laughter] >> You're a genius.

That's those are those would be those would be the top three. I would c Can I add creatine in there? Could I squeeze it in there?

>> No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.

No. No. No.

>> Oh, bro.

>> I had to pick three. So, you picked the multivitamin, omega-3, the vitamin D3.

>> Well, it might humble me to kick the creatine out. So, okay, fine. I'll leave

creatine out. So, okay, fine. I'll leave

those three.

>> You call creatine king creatine.

>> Yeah.

>> Why' you call it that?

It's the only non-farmacological supplement that that really really has a very strong and deep

and broad evidence base for um enhancing the effects of of resistance training.

So strength gains and size gains more strength than size. The size gains they they come with the initial uh loading

phase where a lot more intramuscular water happens or you know intracellular intramiocellular

hydration. That is the the big immediate

hydration. That is the the big immediate part of creatine that that folks feel when they go on it and when they go off of it. So you you'll lose a few pounds

of it. So you you'll lose a few pounds of lean mass if you get off of creatine.

I call it kreat creatine because it has possibly close to a I want to say it's reached over a thousand studies and the majority

of those studies show um positive effects. Usually with with creatine if

effects. Usually with with creatine if you were to compare a group taking creatine versus a group not taking creatine. So the creatine group will

creatine. So the creatine group will have like a 20% increase in their lifting capacity whereas the non-creatine group will have like 12ish%

increase in their lifting capacity over a typical study length 8 to 12 weeksish.

And so that is a significant strength gain advantage and over the long term that would definitely augment muscle

hypertrophy as well. And once you're loaded with creatine, so being loaded with creatine means that you saturate your muscle creatine stores. And that

requires either a loading phase of 20 to 25 grams per day for 5 to 7 days or um a maintenance phase that you engage like 3

to five grams a day. You'll be loaded at um about 30 days. And so during that loading phase, it's pretty common for

people to gain roughly 2% of their body weight um as lean mass.

>> People seem to talk about creatine like it's this miracle thing that everybody should be taking. That's one of the one of the few supplements that it seems all the uh experts I speak to about this stuff seem to agree upon. Obviously,

vitamin D, omega-3 comes up all the time and ultivitamins, but creatine seems to, you know, nobody seems to have much of an issue with it or be able to point to many side effects of taking with it, both for men and women.

>> Yeah, it's got the muscul muscularkeeletal um benefit there. Believe it or not, there's even um benefits for creatine on

on joint health. So um not only that, not only the the athletic performance and muscle hypertrophy side, but there are things like uh improved glucose

control, improved memory. So different

domains of cognition can be enhanced by creatine.

The level of creatine in the brain can increase with with supplementation. And

then you create a pro-energy environment in the brain. And that's how uh these positive effects on memory happen with creatine supplementation, especially in

people with uh cognitive decline. So So

it there's almost nothing creatine can't do.

>> Wow.

Some statement.

>> A business is only as good as the people inside it. So how do you make sure

inside it. So how do you make sure you're hiring the best? Our sponsor,

LinkedIn, can help you find these applicants quickly. I believe in taking

applicants quickly. I believe in taking time to hire slowly, but I also understand that once you've decided to hire, you want to get the ball rolling and get the best candidates in front of you to start interviewing. And that's

where paying to promote your role on LinkedIn makes all the difference because you'll get applicants seven times faster than if you post your job for free. And even though slower, more

for free. And even though slower, more considered hiring is important, you never want your hiring platforms to be what's holding you back. LinkedIn keeps

pace. It takes care of the heavy lifting, sending you highly skilled candidates that you wouldn't find anywhere else. So, when the time comes

anywhere else. So, when the time comes to make your next hire, make it count and promote your job on LinkedIn. Head

to linkedin.com/doac.

That's linkedin.com/doac

and terms and conditions apply.

>> Right guys, going to go get Steve. The

guest is here. Ready?

>> Come in.

>> Oh my god. What

>> What are you doing?

>> This is uh the Bontage face mask. It's h

good for blemishes, wrinkles, uh clears up the skin. It's red light. Have you

not used it before?

>> No.

>> Tried this before. It's um it's really really good. It's shines red light on

really good. It's shines red light on your face, which helps increase and boost collagen production. Actually

found it out cuz the misses seen her wearing it. She terrified me a couple of

wearing it. She terrified me a couple of nights in a row. Um I thought it was to scare people with, but actually it's really really good for your skin. So

they are a sponsor of the podcast and uh I've been using it every day for about a year and a half now.

>> You're glowing. Wow, Steve. Great.

>> Yes. And Boncharge ships worldwide with easy returns and a year-long warranty on all of their products. So, visit

bondcharge.com/diary

for 25% off on any product sitewide, but you have to order through that link.

That's bondcharge.com/diary

with code diary.

>> Diet breaks. What's a diet break and why does that why is that a useful tool?

>> Yes. So,

one of the big things that dieters encounter are progress plateaus. And so,

we can define a progress plateau as four to possibly 8 weeks of no change in body composition despite good compliance to

the program. With that definition out of

the program. With that definition out of the way, then intervening and overcoming or managing a plateau is really sort of

this individualized process that needs to be looked at case by case where for example, if somebody feels like they're in the

midst of a plateau and they have been on program, then there's really only two reasons the plateau happened. So reason

number one is that their compliance was inconsistent. So poor compliance is

inconsistent. So poor compliance is number one or number two they have reached energy equilibrium. So they've reached a

energy equilibrium. So they've reached a genuine and bonafide new maintenance point. But there's something that is

point. But there's something that is overarching with the plateau concept that people need to understand.

So we automatically look at progress plateaus as something negative. when

people need to reorganize or reframe their perception of what a plateau is and the plateau is just the body doing

its job. When we look at the body as an

its job. When we look at the body as an adaptive survival unit then homeostasis is a big part of that. So if the body achieves homeostasis then hallelujah

we're we're going to live. We're going

to survive. So if for example somebody has a lot of weight to lose let's say somewhere to the order of over 20 pounds

20 40 60 lbs to lose they have to understand that multiple plateaus will be encountered on route to their ultimate goal.

And the way that the body changes is always going to be this surge, slow, stop pattern. And it just continues this

stop pattern. And it just continues this way. And with every progressive plateau,

way. And with every progressive plateau, the surge part gets shorter and the

slowing part and then the plateau part gets longer. So you can think of it as

gets longer. So you can think of it as staircases and landings. So with each successive plateau, the staircase gets shorter, the landing gets longer, but

it's supposed to go like that and the plateaus should be getting longer because the ultimate goal after all is a plateau of sorts. And when people come

to realize that, then they can look at plateaus as what I call maintenance practice. So if they have that mental

practice. So if they have that mental shift from seeing plateaus as this negative thing where I need to go sniff out the next great diet or the next great product, they can look at it as

all right, so the plateau is a good thing. The body is doing its job. Now we

thing. The body is doing its job. Now we

have an opportunity to practice maintenance. And think about it this way

maintenance. And think about it this way too, Stephen. Anybody can get weight

too, Stephen. Anybody can get weight off, but weight loss maintenance really is the issue. So the better you get at

the issue. So the better you get at weight loss maintenance, then the more you can win the game.

>> How do I get good at weight loss maintenance?

>> All right. So in order to properly maintain, you have to properly get there. So

properly getting there means that you have to do your best to maintain your lean body mass while you're losing body fat. So

what happens to a lot of people when they diet is they lose a lot of lean body mass along with >> lean body mass. You mean muscle?

>> Yes. Muscle mass.

>> Muscle mass >> along with their fat mass. And so muscle tissue is something very important to keep on the body while you're losing fat

because muscle is we can look at it as our metabolically active. Every tissue is metabolically

active. Every tissue is metabolically active even even body fat. But muscle

tissue specifically is the center of our dietary fuel usage. It is the metabolic engine of the body, if you will. And so

if you're losing muscle tissue, you're really losing metabolic leverage while you're losing body fat.

>> So the way that I infer that is that muscle is very greedy >> and it it it takes a lot takes up a lot of calories. So if I lose my muscle when

of calories. So if I lose my muscle when I get when I drop my weight, it's almost like the greedy guy who who sucks up all my calories is no longer there. And so

I'm quite likely just to to rebound quite quickly.

>> That's a great analogy. And and it's accurate, too. And in fact, there is a

accurate, too. And in fact, there is a phenomenon that in the literature it's called collateral fattening.

And that happens when the body senses an energy crisis at the end of a diet where you've lost a bunch of muscle mass. The

body senses that, oh my gosh, we just lost a bunch of precious tissue. We have

to do whatever we can to get it back.

And so your hunger signals ramp up and your body kind of behaviorally and even metabolically does what is necessary for you to feed that back as soon as

possible. And this does not necessarily

possible. And this does not necessarily happen certainly not to that kind of magnitude if you keep your muscle mass while you're losing body fat. you don't

experience this collateral fattening type of phenomenon where people just rebound like crazy because their appetite is out of control at the end of

the diet. So the way that you preserve

the diet. So the way that you preserve muscle mass during the fat loss process is a couple things. So you have to make sure that your rate of weight loss isn't

indicative of something that's too quick. So about a half a percent to a

quick. So about a half a percent to a full percent of your body weight lost per week is as fast as you really want

to go. So roughly a pound a week. uh

to go. So roughly a pound a week. uh

some people who start off heavier, okay, two pounds a week is fine at the very beginning, but you generally don't want to lose more than 1% of your total body

weight per week because then that increases the chances that you're losing an undue amount of muscle mass along

with your fat mass. And so if you can in essence control the weight loss rate, then you will keep your lean mass.

The other two things that need to be going on at the same time are you need to be resistance training and you need to be consuming enough protein. So

>> strength training and protein >> enough protein, you got resistance training and then you have sort of a top speed limiter on how much weight that

you lose per week. And 1% loss awake 1% loss a week is spectacular actually for most people. Even a pound a week, even

most people. Even a pound a week, even half a pound a week, you're looking at like in two years you lost 50 pounds.

Most people took like two decades to put on that 50 pounds.

>> So you actually don't want to lose weight too quickly or else you are susceptible to rebound.

>> It is going to come off quickly if you have a lot of weight to lose. It'll come

off quickly at the beginning. So, for

example, uh somebody who is in a state of obesity, let's say they weigh 250 pounds and let's say they're losing two two and a half pounds a week at the beginning of the program, that's fine.

But on average, on average, you you would want to look at roughly a pound a week is a good benchmark. And I still would

not frown upon or scoff at a half a pound a week for certain cases. And we

can talk about some of those stubborn cases. Like on the topic of plateaus,

cases. Like on the topic of plateaus, for example, I had a client uh I'm sure she doesn't mind being named. She's a

great person, Pam Pam Gresock. She's a

veteran coach in the space. Uh she's

permenopausal, so she's in her her 40s.

And she wanted to lose what we calculated out to be 8 pounds of fat. and she stored the majority of

of fat. and she stored the majority of it where she didn't want it was around the midsection.

And I had it in mind that okay, this is somebody who's permenopausal, so there's going to be a lower rate of progress going on. This is somebody who is highly

going on. This is somebody who is highly trained. So, she doesn't have a lot more

trained. So, she doesn't have a lot more muscle to put on that would give her some, you know, some extra in quotes metabolic leverage for the whole process

of improving body composition. So, she's

highly trained, permenopausal, wants to lose 8 pounds of fat, which would represent the final eight pounds.

sort of that that pushing the envelope.

Knowing those three things, I knew that this is going to be a difficult and slowgoing process. So whereas I would

slowgoing process. So whereas I would normally have somebody expect roughly or at least gun for a pound a week loss,

for Pam, it was more like, are you going to be okay with one to two pounds per month? like if we can get rid of one to two pounds of body

fat per month, I would be happy with it and I think you should be happy with it.

And so I convinced her of that. And with

her wanting to lose 8 pounds, I think it helps to give people a visual of what a certain amount of weight loss looks

like. So coincidentally, a gallon a

like. So coincidentally, a gallon a gallon jug if you fill it with butter, that's 8 pounds. And so I had her

visualize this 8 pound jug.

And um I also had her do a butter visualization too. So um a standard

visualization too. So um a standard stick of butter is 4 ounces. So four

sticks of butter is one pound. And uh in her case, she wanted to lose well she wanted to lose 8 pounds. So that's 32 sticks of butter that would be removed

from her body at the end of the dieting cycle. Is that what this is here? What

cycle. Is that what this is here? What

is this?

>> That is 10 pounds of butter. This is an amazing freaking visual. And this this is because you asked about diet breaks as a tool for people achieving long-term

weight loss or just breaking through plateaus or managing plateaus. So

every 5 to 10 pounds that somebody loses in a dieting cycle is high time for a diet break. The way

you can define a diet break, put some parameters on it. So it's what I call non yolo maintenance. So you take off the rules, take off the restrictions, but you're not eating with sheer

abandon. You're just relaxing the diet.

abandon. You're just relaxing the diet.

You take a week off the diet either every four to eight weeks while you're dieting or you take a week off of the diet

every 5 to 10 lbs that you lose. And the

sound of 5 to 10 lbs seems like oh that's nothing.

>> But no, it's a milestone.

>> This is 10 pounds.

>> Yes, >> that's crazy.

>> 10 pounds of of butter off the body. So

yeah, every time you you lose 10 pounds, it's 5 to 10 pounds in in my experience is high time to take a diet break to just alleviate the mental and the

physical fatigue of dieting.

And that's one of the tactics that you can use for a long-term adherence to a plan.

On the topic of plateaus, you can when you're dieting, you will hit a point where the plateau periods or the maintenance phases

are going to be longer than the dieting phases. I think that that's ideal to be

phases. I think that that's ideal to be able to hit that point for a long-term weight loss goal. And so it's a lot easier or at least a lot less

intimidating for somebody to know that they're going to be dieting for 4 to 8 weeks at a time in between a let's say a

2 to 3 month maintenance phase.

>> What about fasting?

Do you think that fasting is because a lot of people talk about this thing called autophagy where if you fast for I don't know 48 hours your body switches into the state of autophagy where it starts to heal and repair itself.

Are you a fan of fasting for weight loss or for autophagy or other things >> for the control of calories in fasting

is legit and it's also legit for it. It

actually works a as a as one of the options for dieting. There just has been a massive accumulation of studies showing that it

works great. So the intermittent fasting

works great. So the intermittent fasting variants, we have one one we talked about earlier timerestricted eating and we've got every other day fasting and

then the other third major variant would be twice weekly fasting or the 52 type of model. And then you have like

of model. And then you have like consecutive day fasting type of models as well which are less studied because there's just more risk involved in them and it's tough to you know incur that

risk in research. When you bring up autophagy, that's where I kind of have to push back on um not on your your mentioning of it

specifically, but just in general.

People will say or we'll make claims that yeah, autophagy and we can say that we can explain

autophagy as a way that the body gets rid of uh parts of damaged cells.

It's an important process within the body and it is a catabolic process or a breakdown process.

But the thing is it happens in a caloric deficit regardless of whether fasting is involved or not.

>> Really?

>> Yes. You maintain hypocchloric conditions. Autophagy ramps up.

conditions. Autophagy ramps up.

um you can have a linear hypocoric model or a nonlinear or intermittent hypocaloric model and you'll get similar

degrees of autophagy if you match the caloric deficit by the end of the week.

Now the other interesting thing about autophagy is that you can ramp up autophagy through exercise

and not only that but both major types of exercise will increase autophagy. So

resistance training increases autophagy.

Endurance aerobic type training increases autophagy.

So, if you want to in quotes chase autophagy, then doing it through intermittent fasting or just going through prolonged periods of not eating can be a

double-edged sword. Whereas the

double-edged sword. Whereas the autophagy increases through exercise, they almost don't have a downside. And

so, um, a lot of times with intermittent fasting, it can be a great tool for people who need to lose excess body weight. But what I'm seeing in the

weight. But what I'm seeing in the community is people thinking that intermittent fasting is something that is necessary to do regardless of your

body fat level. That is either necessary or beneficial. And that's not actually

or beneficial. And that's not actually true per per the research. There's

there's a this one study in particular that looked at men who are already lean and I believe this was by Templeton and colleagues where they compared a linear

dieting model with an every other day fasting model.

>> What does that mean every other day fasting? So they took 24 hours off.

fasting? So they took 24 hours off.

>> Yes. Yeah. So it was Yep. every other

day and then the same deficit by the end of the by the end of the week between the two groups. And the intermittent

group actually lost more lean body mass than the linear caloric deficit group.

>> They lost more lean body.

>> They lost more lean body mass.

>> So they lost more weight.

>> They muscle.

>> Lost more muscle.

Yeah. And so that gives us a hint that fasting is great until it isn't because you've achieved what you needed to achieve. And so then it just kind of

achieve. And so then it just kind of becomes a tool. It it it's always just a tool to help people control calories.

And one of the beautiful things about fasting and whether it's timerestricted eating or whether it's some sort of variant of alternate day fasting or

twice a week fasting is that it works in research regardless of whether people are meticulously tracking things or not. And so that that

can be a boon for individuals who don't necessarily like to micromanage their stuff. But for people who are trying to

stuff. But for people who are trying to maximize retention of lean mass while they're pushing the envelope of uh fitness, uh it can definitely be a double-edged

sword once you're already lean.

>> But if I do want to maximize the benefits of autophagy, the best way to do that is fasting versus just calorie restriction. I'm assuming

restriction. I'm assuming >> we don't know what the optimal level of autophagy is that would actually confer health benefits. We don't know what that

health benefits. We don't know what that threshold is. And there's different ways

threshold is. And there's different ways that people try to measure autophagy.

It's very hard to correlate certain levels of autophagy with certain certain degrees of disease prevention.

We we're not there yet. Um, I don't think I I I think big picture-wise I think that autophagy is an algorithm

running in the background that is more of a bystander type of thing than a driver. Simple sim similar to insulin

driver. Simple sim similar to insulin and glucagon. So the insulin and

and glucagon. So the insulin and glucagon axis works when you feed versus when you're fasting. So glucagon levels

go up. What's glucagon?

go up. What's glucagon?

>> Glucagon is a hormone that mobilizes fuel stores in the absence of food, in the absence of calories.

And autophagy is similar in that regard.

And I think that a focus on pushing autophagy is sort of missing the forest for the trees. Because if we were to push

trees. Because if we were to push autophagy to its end, then we could go all the way to a phenomenon called autotosis, which is runaway cell death,

which happens in starvation in some cases.

And so I think that we need to focus on other things like how do we maintain a certain body fat percentage while maintaining

a certain physical activity level while maintaining a certain dietary pattern.

I think that it's those things that are much more productive to target than seeing how far can we push autophagy before potentially going into runaway

cell death.

>> Mhm. I was looking at the the benefits of this thing they call autophagy and it says there the proven likely benefits are cellular cleaner. So repairs damaged

proteins and organels I believe improving cell efficiency. Metabolic

health improves insulin sensitivity neuroproction heart and muscle quality maintains mitochondria helps adapt to training and oxidative stress. immune

tuning and longevity. There's sort of strong animal evidence I believe >> around the longevity component, but they the the research that I was reading talked about how it can back back

backfire because um tumors may use autophagy to survive. Um and some treatments for established cancers aim to inhibit it. And if you overdo

fasting, as you said in the study you cited, you can lose muscle, which is not great, and be fatigued, etc. Um there is a bit of a trend I think with people doing a lot of water fasts and stuff like that quite periodically. I think

it's rising even sort of juice fasts and stuff like that. What's your take on those types of fasts?

>> I'm not a big fan Stephen. Uh I think that the cycle that people go through at least in the developed world is that they go through the year then November

comes around and then the holidays hit.

They overdo it from November to through December all the way up to the end of the year and they're like, "Oh boy, I have 10 to 20 pounds that I want to

lose." And then they just use these sort

lose." And then they just use these sort of fasts and these detoxes to crash off

the bad decisions of the previous few months. And then the cycle repeats

months. And then the cycle repeats annually.

So, I think that it's a much healthier approach for people to secure and reinforce the right habits through the entirety of the year instead of um

jumping on the fast to get rid of the the the holiday binges.

>> This sort of brings me to the ketogenic diet. Um, my dad used the ketogenic diet

diet. Um, my dad used the ketogenic diet and I think actually my brother as well.

Um, but also a few of my friends in my life used it as a way to drop their fat quite quickly to sort of recomposite their body um, very very quickly. And

the results of seeing someone on the ketogenic diet are quite astounding because my friend the other day sent me the chart of his weighing scales at home and it's the sort of gradual increase upwards and then he did the ketogenic

diet where he cut out carbohydrates and sugars basically almost entirely and it's just straight line down in his body his body weight. What is your perspective on the ketogenic diet? What

is it good for? What is it not good for?

Is it good at all?

It is a very effective way to lose weight and fat.

And that's for a few big reasons. First

of all, if somebody goes from their typical western dietary pattern to the ketogenic diet, then they're

automatically cutting out a lot of highly processed, hyper palatable carb fat combo junk foods and snacks.

that are just energy dense, easy to over consume mindlessly.

That's the good thing about the ketogenic diet in addition to well, they're finally eating enough protein now. And so along with the increase in

now. And so along with the increase in protein comes an increase in satiety and a better hunger control.

Now, the negatives of the ketogenic diet, the big one is that the majority of people who engage a ketogenic diet,

they don't do it permanently. For one

reason or another, they're no longer on the keto diet. And this is reflected in research as well. Even in uh vulnerable populations who would stand to benefit

from from that level of restriction. So

usually what happens in research is you take you take a group two groups of subjects and one is on the high carb low-fat control diet and one of them is

on a ketogenic diet which can be achieved by a maximum of 50 grams of carbohydrate in the day or or less then you're on the keto diet. So what happens

at the 12 month point in the diet and sometimes at the six-month point, the keto group is now consuming about two to three times more carbohydrates than the

original 50 gram assignment.

>> So they rebound.

>> They just insidiously creep up the carb intake.

There's something about the ketogenic diet that the majority of people who engage it just can't stick to. It's too

restrictive for people. they can't stick to it. But by what you're saying, they

to it. But by what you're saying, they also end up rebounding >> above where they were before.

>> They end up rebounding like I'll give you a specific example.

There was one study well there was the A Toz study where um the individuals on the Atkins diet ended

up consuming what looked a lot like the zone diet.

>> The zone diet?

>> Yes. The zone diet is a 40% carbohydrate, 30% protein, 30% fat.

>> So it's the keto diet roughly.

>> Um the keto diet is more like 60 to 80% fat and then you know 15 to 20ish% protein and then the carbohydrates are the remainder

the minor percentage. So what happens is like the people who started off at 50 gram of carbohydrate at the beginning of the study, the keto group at the

12-month point, they were they crept that carbohydrate intake up to around 150 gram of carbohydrate, whereas their

assignment was 50 gram of carbohydrate a day. This is a common theme in long-term

day. This is a common theme in long-term keto studies is this up creep in carbohydrate intake over time because people can't maintain the the the 50

grams of carbohydrate max required to stay in ketosis.

And I'm not saying that there aren't a lot of people out there who are just living the keto life permanently.

They're out there.

>> Yeah.

>> But they are in the minority. I see them in the comment section whenever I talk about keto. I see people say, "Look,

about keto. I see people say, "Look, I've been on the keto diet for 5 years, for seven years, for 10 years."

>> Sure, there's entire there's huge communities of folks who've been on keto for 5 10 years or longer. And that's

great. More power to these folks. But

claiming that this is a universal solution ignores the reality that some people, most people uh per the research, the majority can't stick to it. So

that's the the caveat, one of the caveats of the keto diet. The other one would be for those who can stick to the keto diet for long enough. You really

have to look at the quality of uh the diet in order for it to be cardiovascularly healthy. If you're

cardiovascularly healthy. If you're going to engage an let's say an 80 85% fat diet for the rest of your life, there's going to be very different

effects if that 80 to 85% are from land animal fats versus from nuts, avocados, olive oil.

Very different cardiovascular effects going on there. And so, uh, that's the other caveat with the keto diet. There's

a Mediterranean type of keto diet that is healthy and that has, you know, it it is one of these cardiovascularly

protective types of diets that you can engage. Whereas, if you just do like

engage. Whereas, if you just do like beef, bacon, and butter from here on out, then uh you don't have the best cardiovascular risk trajectory.

>> What about gaining muscle on the ketogenic diet? If I'm restricting

ketogenic diet? If I'm restricting carbohydrates, is it more difficult to gain muscle mass?

>> The short answer is yes. And the nuanced answer is you still can gain muscle on keto.

And the body is is really resilient and and quite genius at manufacturing the carbohydrate um endogenously or from

within the body. So your your body can make carbohydrate out of lactate and fill at least partially your muscle

glycogen stores. And so um going on a

glycogen stores. And so um going on a zero carbohydrate diet doesn't necessarily end up with the type of results that you

you you might imagine for somebody who's completely avoiding carbohydrates. And

in the research comparing strength gains from a high carbohydrate, low-fat diet versus a keto diet, the keto folks, as long as they're equated

with protein and total calories with the control diet, they've got similar strength gains. It's quite a an

strength gains. It's quite a an interesting phenomenon.

Muscle size gains is different story.

Interestingly, almost always there's some advantage to the high carb, low-fat control group compared with the ketogenic diet group

when it comes to both gains in lean mass as well as retention of lean mass during dieting. And one of those things is

dieting. And one of those things is more or less obvious. It's like you you simply carry more muscle glycogen when you're on a high carbohydrate, low-fat

diet. and muscle glyco glycogen is the

diet. and muscle glyco glycogen is the stored form of carbohydrate within the muscle and then a minor amount in the liver and for every gram of carbohydrate

that you store as glycogen there's threeish grams of water stuck to it and so just sitting there you're carrying more more muscle mass more fullness on a

non ketogenic diet >> what about the carnivore diet a lot of people have talked about that recently which is just a diet where you just eat meat What's your just your point of view on that?

>> Well, okay, it's a little silly and it's a little extreme, but it has some merit to it. So, the carnivore diet, when you

to it. So, the carnivore diet, when you get on it, it's similar to how when people go on a keto diet after they've been doing the standard western diet since forever. So, the standard western

since forever. So, the standard western diet has too much of everything. It's

got too much total calories, too much refined carbohydrate. It's got too much

refined carbohydrate. It's got too much of this type of fat and too much h it's got a moderate amount of protein, but you're also eating everything under the sun from burgers to fries to cakes to

ice creams to cookies. Uh in addition to pasta and everything else. So when you go from that excess of everything to the

carnivore diet, you automatically and spontaneously eat far fewer calories than you used to on your standard western diet. So the carnivore diet is

western diet. So the carnivore diet is actually the lesser of the evils when we're comparing it to the standard western diet. And you can even try to

western diet. And you can even try to optimize the carnivore diet. Like some

people engage a carnivore diet that is just extreme like beef and salt. Okay?

So that is very appealing to people who have a tendency to jump on the carnivore diet cuz it's even more extreme. And

people with tendencies towards the extremes, they'll a lot of them are exve one one extreme side or the other. It's

tough for them to be in the gray scale here. But the carnivore diet

here. But the carnivore diet is um the lesser of the evils.

can be optimized, if that's even possible, if people had more variety within their carnivore model, within their plant-free diet model. Like for

example, if some went carnivore, instead of doing beef and salt, he had a rotation of fatty fish, poultry, beef,

eggs dairy and who knows, maybe he might even justify protein powder in there for a dessert. Who knows? It's still

dessert. Who knows? It's still

animal-based.

Um, >> do you find that vegans and vegetarians struggle more to gain muscle mass?

Typically, >> vegans and vegetarians in the general population do because they're not aware of how to structure the diet and the training program to to

achieve that. So,

achieve that. So, >> what are they missing?

>> They're just not eating enough total calories and they're not eating enough protein, generally speaking. Now, there

are some vegans who will drink a bunch of Mountain Dew and, you know, have have um potato chips and and things like that and still stay vegan. And Oreo cookies

are vegan, I I believe, as well. But

vegans can still gain muscle on par with omnivores if they structure it right.

>> Are most people that you encounter and have worked with over the years not getting enough protein?

like the average person on the street.

>> Yes.

Almost everybody who has been overweight or obese or just had some degree of of an issue with their body fat levels. Almost all

of them under consume protein.

>> What about people that are very skinny?

because I've got lots of friends that um would be in the skinny fat category where they they're kind of they look very very very skinny but they've got you know a little bit of a role here

>> um and they often say to me that they just can't gain weight.

>> I've heard this a lot from from friends.

I I just can't get gain weight. I've

heard I need to have more protein but you know I'm just not gaining any weight.

>> Yeah, that is the in quotes hard gainer phenomenon. And people will have

phenomenon. And people will have different degrees of body fat in in that category. But these folks, what they

category. But these folks, what they actually have an issue with is a spontaneous increase in what we call non exercise activity thermogenesis. So

basically, it's an increase in spontaneous movement. just an increase

spontaneous movement. just an increase in fidgeting, you know, tapping, moving around, uh just being more hyperinetic

in response to increasing their caloric intake. In 24 hours, you and I expend X

intake. In 24 hours, you and I expend X amount of calories.

>> Mhm.

>> So total daily energy expenditure is composed of um various components. So

there is a resting energy expenditure component. M

component. M >> so our so-called resting metabolic rate or it's also called resting energy expenditure or basil metabolic rate those are all interchangeable

that is the amount of calories that your body burns in a 24-hour period just to stay alive. Okay so if you are bedridden

stay alive. Okay so if you are bedridden the amount of calories you you burn just through your vital organs and your systems working that's your resting

energy expenditure.

Now the other part of energy expenditure is your active energy expenditure. So

active energy expenditure consists of we can subdivide it into your exercise activity and your non-ex exercise activity. With hard gainers it's their

activity. With hard gainers it's their nonex exercise activity that spontaneously goes up when they try to eat more to

gain weight. There's a an interesting

gain weight. There's a an interesting study done in the late 1990s by Lavine and colleagues where he took a group of normal weight subjects. It was mostly

male sample of subjects and he fed them 1,000 calories above and beyond their maintenance requirements and I believe

this was for 10 weeks. What happened

during the during the study and as a result of eating 1,000 calories above their maintenance needs, they ended up

burning on average 336 calories through an increase in nonex exercise activity.

So that that is a very interesting phenomenon. One of the uh subjects in

phenomenon. One of the uh subjects in that study actually ended up burning almost 700 calories as an increase in their non exercise activity

thermogenesis.

And so what happens to this archetype, this hardgain gainer person is they just start fidgeting more, they just start walking faster. They just start sitting

walking faster. They just start sitting less. They start bobbing their head

less. They start bobbing their head more. And they can even uh just

more. And they can even uh just subconsciously train harder, train more, and their energy expenditure side just

ramps up spontaneously in response to an increase in calories. So,

>> so if someone is a hard gainer and they struggle to gain weight because of this sort of spontaneous energy usage, >> what advice would you give them?

>> To stop moving, >> eat more.

Okay, so the principle would be to eat more. Uh the practice would be eat more

more. Uh the practice would be eat more in a way that you get those calories in easily and conveniently.

And so you can structure liquid meals, two in a day. They rarely need three shakes to have between their meals

at any point in the day where it's convenient. And then you just literally

convenient. And then you just literally add nutrition and calories that way.

And that so that's the solution. Just

literally eat more.

>> I think the the thing that sits underneath everything we're talking about is motivation, whatever that means, which is like having the motivation to stick to something, discipline, whatever you want

to call it. When you look back through the last 30 years of your career, are there any similarities in the thing or

the catalyst moment that made somebody finally stick to it? stick to the diet, stick to the exercise regime, stick to the whatever.

>> Is there are there any themes of a person going from struggling to disciplined?

>> So the first thing that comes to my mind is they finally arrive at the point where their physical goals become

priority number one.

changing the body. So, losing body fat, gaining muscle, achieving your ideal body composition,

that is a colossally difficult goal.

Whenever I work with somebody who's preparing for a contest of some sort, whether it is in the more elite line of

physique contest or whether they're just joining a transformation challenge, but they're both very very serious and they both are putting their program at the

top of their priority list. So when I say top of your priority, I mean you do what you need to do to stay alive and and and keep breathing as as a top

priority. And right there is your

priority. And right there is your physical goals. Okay. So, the big

physical goals. Okay. So, the big problem with people who find that they can't hit their goals or they can't stay consistent or they're just having a

struggle losing x amount of body fat or even a struggle gaining x amount of muscle is that they simply have five other things that are prioritized in

their day above and beyond their their program. Mhm.

program. Mhm.

>> So they have five universes of excuses that can come in the way of sticking to the program. So

somebody has to be at the point in their lives where they're going to make it a top priority because you know there's nothing metabolically different from these physique competitors and these people who join these challenges versus

somebody in the general population who's just struggling.

The people in the physique contests will always hit their goal within 1% at the end of the prep period. They'll always

hit their goal. And so they're not a different species. They're not a

different species. They're not a different animal. They don't have

different animal. They don't have special metabolisms. They just have different priorities. And so that is the

different priorities. And so that is the difference. You have to hit a point

difference. You have to hit a point where your physical goal becomes priority one. And is there anything

priority one. And is there anything that one can do in your opinion or that you try and do when you were a trainer back in the day to make this someone's

priority?

>> You can sit somebody down and review with them the what are the reasons why you're doing this? name me

three three three good things that you think will come out of this or three drivers that you can think about and then you can just have them write that

down and then they can be reminded that way but fundamentally Stephen they have to arrive at that point sort of on a

self-initiated way you you can't really make the horse drink you know you can pull them towards the freaking pond you know, they almost have to to get

there themselves. And and you're kind of

there themselves. And and you're kind of you can facilitate it only to a certain degree. And after you ask them, okay,

degree. And after you ask them, okay, what what are the reasons? Then you can also have them put in their face, okay, what are the barriers? So to have them write down your three biggest stumbling

blocks and so then you can give them two sets of things to think about that will keep them on task and motivated.

>> You're 53 years old.

>> 53. 53 years old. You looked very different at 40 years old.

>> Ah. Oh, yes, sir. I did.

Yeah. Whoa, buddy. Yep. Yep. Mhm. I

remember that guy.

Woo. That's an amazing shot.

I >> mean, you look younger now.

>> I do, actually. Thank God. Thank God.

Yeah. Yeah. That that always gets me, man. That that picture always gets me.

man. That that picture always gets me.

Why?

>> It was when my my first son was sevenish and my younger baby was um about four.

And so parents with young children are very stressed out, bad habits. I used to drink heavily. Yeah. I I started

drink heavily. Yeah. I I started drinking heavily at that point. Um, and

I drank heavily from when I was 40 till I was about 46.

>> Were you an alcoholic at at 40 years old?

>> Oh, yes. Oh, yes.

>> What did that look like?

>> It was it it got really bad towards the final couple years. I'm talking a bottle bottle and a half of wine a a night by

myself.

>> Seven days a week.

>> Seven days a week. And the bottle and a half that's almost 1,000 calories of 1,000 calories of regret is what it was.

Yeah.

>> Do you know what caused that?

>> The various stress vectors in life, you know. um

know. um being a dad, trying to be the best husband.

Um becoming successful uh in terms of coming into demand with projects and people approaching me with business partnerships

and um me thinking, geez, I I worked like two decades for this for this stuff to happen. How can I turn anything down?

to happen. How can I turn anything down?

you know, so I said, "Yes, I'll do that.

Yes, I'll do that. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes." And then pretty soon your your

yes." And then pretty soon your your yeses just stack up and your work pile stacks up like this. All of those things, you know, they kind of converge

into this mix of stress and anxiety. And

alcohol is a very convenient and very available and very acceptable means

to engage in a substance that acts as an anxiety band-aid. My alcohol addiction

anxiety band-aid. My alcohol addiction was a very real thing. Uh, and

I'm really glad I I overcame it.

>> Through this period from 40 to 46, 47, >> who were you and what is it that you you did that made you realize something

had to change?

>> So during that time period, I was just very reactive. to my

environment.

>> I was just going with the flow.

Uh I honestly was not as ambitious as I should have been and and focused on my goals.

I was comfortable.

I was comfortable.

And the unfortunate thing about the drink and fortunate thing too is it it hit a rock bottom point where

I knew that it wasn't a matter of all right I got to pull back or how am I going to moderate and this and that. It

was more like I just need to stop. I just need to stop and I need to redirect this tendency towards routine. this tendency, this

towards routine. this tendency, this sort of obsessive compulsive thing of needing to do the same thing daily, just redirect it.

>> How did you know you needed to stop?

>> Oh, I knew that I needed to stop because my professional and personal life basically imploded all all because of my my own actions.

>> Now, for you, was it just a case of right, I'm going to stop doing this or did you have to did you go somewhere?

Did you get support? Did you seek some counseling or anything like that? So, I

have been able to just make the hardcore commitment to stop and keep that commitment. And um I've been able to

commitment. And um I've been able to redirect my ritualistic tendencies towards training and good nutrition. And

I get a lot of questions like every year I do a post on Instagram about how, okay, it's year six now, not a single drink. Here's what I've learned during

drink. Here's what I've learned during that time. And then uh next month

that time. And then uh next month uh actually on the 25th of August uh that's going to be year seven. So I'm

going to do the same thing. And so the question I always get is so how do you stay abstinate? Like what what do you do

stay abstinate? Like what what do you do to not slip up?

And what I do is if I get kind of a craving or a nagging or a feeling like, "Oh my god, I got to have some alcohol."

Then I just sit back and I think through the scenario in my mind of me drinking to my degree of satisfaction, degree of, you know, s-facedness

and then I kind of picture that and then I picture how it might last for an hour or two and then after that hour or two I may have made some really bad

impressions on on one or more people.

Uh, after that hour or two, I may have plowed through the the hot wings at 2 3:00 a.m.

3:00 a.m.

And then after that, feel like hell the next morning. Definitely can't work out

next morning. Definitely can't work out that day.

And then where did that get me? And so I just go through that scenario in my mind. And then when I'm done going

mind. And then when I'm done going through that scenario, it takes like a minute and I'm right back at uh where I need to be uh mind frame wise.

>> I think the same could also apply that sort of visualization that premortem where you kind of play out the scenario and see what the consequence would be can also be applied to many of the things we're talking about today around

diet and workouts and stuff like that.

Like playing it forward to see how you'll feel about it in the future and sort of visualizing those consequences.

Thank you for sharing that. I I think it's somewhat dovetailed into how what what we're talking about about changing your life and motivation and discipline like how does change occur in people and as you said it's when it becomes a

priority and quite clearly in your life it became a priority for a number of reasons.

>> Yeah.

>> Quick one I want to talk about something we all need to take seriously which is cyber security. Whether you're a

cyber security. Whether you're a first-time founder facing your very first audit or a seasoned professional who's been through it all, staying compliant is getting more critical than ever and more complicated, I have to

say. And that is where Vanta comes in,

say. And that is where Vanta comes in, who is a sponsor of this podcast. Vant

takes the pain out of security compliance, automating the tedious but essential process of proving your business is secure across over 35

frameworks like SOCK 2, ISO 2701.

centralize your workflows, answer security questions up to five times faster, and protect your business without losing focus on growth. And this

is really a critical part of this. A new

IDC white paper found that companies using Vant save over $535,000 a year, and it pays for itself in just 3 months. For a limited time, my community

months. For a limited time, my community gets $1,000 off Vanta at vanta.com/stephven.

vanta.com/stephven.

That's van.com/stephven

for $1,000 off. Electrolytes are

absolutely exploding at the moment and it's for good reason. People are getting more and more into their health and fitness and one of the things that I think we've recently discovered as a society is the profound impact that electrolytes have on hydration but also

the impact that hydration has on how you feel, how you perform, how you think. So

with all that in mind and because I became quite obsessed with electrolytes, I decided that I was going to launch my own electrolytes company as you do. And

as I was doing that, I spoke to my friend George Heaton and I said, "George, I'm launching this electrolytes business. Can you take a look at it?" He

business. Can you take a look at it?" He

said, "Stephen, me and my friend Ross have already developed one and would love to show it to you." And then they put me in this WhatsApp group and said, "We're building a brand called Cadence.

We haven't launched yet, but take a look." I took a look. I tried the cans,

look." I took a look. I tried the cans, I tried the sachets, and I fell in love.

So, I shut down my own electrolytes company and took a stake in this one called Cadence, which has been by far in a way the best product in terms of taste, but also in terms of performance.

500 mg of sodium, 190 millig of potassium, 30 mg of magnesium, no sugar, delicious taste. Give it a shot. Go to

delicious taste. Give it a shot. Go to

usecadence.com and join what I believe to be is the fastest growing electrolytes company on planet earth.

Cheers.

How do you feel about artificial sweeteners? Are they uh is there any

sweeteners? Are they uh is there any watchouts that we should be aware of?

Generally speaking, they're a nothing burger and there's a lot of scaremongering around artificial sweeteners.

But there is one artificial sweetener that has a kind of a crappy track record

for both impairing glucose control and also weight gain. And that's saccharine.

So saccharine is the one artificial sweetener that's kind of bombed out at the bomb shelter there as far as the literature is concerned. But the good news about saccharine,

it's by the way, it's the little pink packet things.

It's not really uh commercially pervasive.

>> So it's not that popular anyway.

>> No, it's almost commercially extinct.

So, um, the other sweeteners like sucralose, aspartame, stevia, or some people call it stevia, um, they're all fair game. They're all in the same boat.

fair game. They're all in the same boat.

All pretty dang innocuous. And you'd

have to consume impossible amounts of those things to incur negative health effects in in a lifetime really.

>> Because some people have thought that they're potentially carcen, these sort of artificial sweeteners that you find in certain diet beverages.

>> Yeah. No, that's that's definitely a leap. That's definitely a leap based on

leap. That's definitely a leap based on animal data and completely unrealistic doses and conditions that are irrelevant to human physiology.

Yeah, it's it's more dangerous stepping out and breathing in the the city air basically.

>> What is the most important thing we haven't talked about that we should have talked about, Alan, for the people that are sat at home listening to this?

>> A really damn good question.

Okay. So,

if we look at the things people care about that don't freaking matter in terms of diet,

they fixate on weird buzzwords like they fixate on not even they don't have to be weird words but like sugar for example.

There has been such scaremongering around sugar to the point that people don't delineate between added sugars to the diet versus sugar that is intrinsic

or naturally occurring in foods. Things

like fruit, fresh fruit >> and even milk has naturally occurring uh sugar in it. Lactose

um can be problematic for um some of the population. But look at fresh fruit.

population. But look at fresh fruit.

I've actually heard people vilify fruit because it has sugar and

it's one thing to take an idea and put out a a plausible claim. Okay, so yeah, it's got sugar and then you know we all know that if you add a ton of sugar to

the diet, you lower the quality of the diet and then you can um push your bets towards negative health consequences down the line. Okay, that that's fine.

That's reasonable. But

even though fruit has sugar, it also has a ton of other beneficial components to it. And it's in this low calorie, high

it. And it's in this low calorie, high water, high micronutrient density package that is satiating and displaces

stomach space for other wise junky foods that you may a lot of people would have consumed instead of that fruit.

But beyond all that, for forget about all the reasoning and stuff, let's look at the literature. Does fruit cause negative health consequences? Does it

cause things like impaired blood glucose control? Does it cause obesity? Does it

control? Does it cause obesity? Does it

cause weight gain? Uh, it does the opposite of all those things. Fresh

fruit actually has been shown to improve glycemic control, improve body weight, improve body composition, and improve the protection against a range of

cardioabolic diseases and cancer. So

it doesn't really matter what anybody says. We just have to face face the

says. We just have to face face the evidence. Um there's something called

evidence. Um there's something called the glycemic index that was big in the 80s and 90s and people were it's kind of come back around again. glycemic index.

You got to avoid the high glycemic index foods and things like that. And there's

a couple of fruits that are actually have a high glycemic index. That would

be pineapples and and watermelons, >> watermelons.

>> Yeah. High on the GI scale. But the way that glycemic index is determined is you get 50 grams of carbohydrate from a given food regardless of the amount that you have to eat. 50 grams of it. And

then you measure its effect on your blood sugar levels for 2 hours after ingestion. I was going to say cuz

ingestion. I was going to say cuz watermelon's seen as keto friendly which is but but >> watermelons have what's called a low glycemic load. So they have a very low

glycemic load. So they have a very low amount of carbohydrate per serving.

>> Yeah. Per serving. Yeah.

>> Even though the carbohydrate itself if you were to gather 50 grams of it >> would have a a more pronounced effect on blood sugar elevations.

And so they're even though fruits those fruits have a high GI and certain foods have a high GI, they have a low glycemic

load. And ultimately people need to stop

load. And ultimately people need to stop um stop and think about things like the the longest living populations on the

planet do not avoid fruit. The fruit is a regular part of their intake.

>> What about the white stuff? The white

sort of added sugar. The is it called refined sugar?

>> What about We can call it added sugar.

>> Mhm.

>> What about the added sugar?

>> Added sugar is problematic in two different ways at least. So the first way is it's diluting the nutrient density of the diet. It's uh it's a phenomenon called micronutrient

dilution. when you have just a bunch of

dilution. when you have just a bunch of junk micronutrient-free calories in the diet.

The other way that it poses a problem is because it is usually packaged with highly processed and engineered refined carbohydrate and fat combination foods.

So, your classic desserts, pastries, cookies, cakes, things like that.

And so the sugar itself, if you were to if I were to just put a a jar of sugar in front of you and say, "Hey, I challenge you to not just spoon that

in." You'll go, "Oh, no problem." You

in." You'll go, "Oh, no problem." You

know, it's people paint sugar out to be this inherently evil thing. But the way that it gets into trouble is when it is

a part of these hyper palatable, highly processed, high, highly engineered dessert and snack foods. And so that is the main issue with added sugar. And the

various health organizations I mentioned the Institute of Medicine or now the National Academy of Medicine saying, "Hey, we need to cut off our added sugars at 25% of the diet." There's the

World Health Organization who presents the sort of the absolutely terrified version of that where they want people to max out their added sugar to to 5% of

the calories in the diet. But that's

usually not realistic and it gets a little bit extreme to the point of being um pathological. So,

>> so what would you say >> about 10% of total calories max wi with added sugar and that would fall kind of

right into this discretionary caloric aotment of 10 to 20% of calories kind of from whatever you want and I would want

to qualify that 10 to 20% margin by saying that if you're hyper caloric in other words if you're consuming more calories than you're taking in you're trying to gain weight or something like

that you probably want to keep your your discretionary calorie aotment to 10% or your indulgence food to 10% rather than 20%.

>> How many days a week do you go to the gym?

>> Four to five.

>> I'm just trying to confront this this question mark in my head about if you go to the gym seven days a week, for example, is that not giving your body enough time to rest? But I guess it depends what you're doing there and how hard you're working.

>> Yeah. A great example of that is total sets per week.

>> Okay. you know, like you can cram, let's imagine for a given muscle group, you do like nine nine sets a week or 10 sets a

week. Uh, you could probably get those

week. Uh, you could probably get those in in a single session, but it's more productive to probably spread it out over at least two days.

>> How long does it take for me to start to lose muscle?

>> Oh man. Okay, that is a good question and a tough one. So muscle loss happens very rapidly in bedridden individuals.

So lean mass just especially critically ill folks, oh man, goes really fast.

Contrast that with you taking a week off or even two weeks off, but it's more of like um an active rest where you're not

just merely sitting around.

You could probably go a couple weeks before you start noticing material drops in in strength and

fitness. Uh 3 weeks, yeah, you'll

fitness. Uh 3 weeks, yeah, you'll definitely I think you'll definitely feel that.

>> And do I need to work out till failure in terms of resistance training and like, you know, bicep curls, whatever, in order to get gains? Do I need to be going all the way until I can't curl it

anymore?

It depends on the goal. Um, you

mentioned that your goal was to gain muscle.

>> Yeah.

>> So, in reality, um, and and this question is surprisingly more complex than you might hope it it's going to be,

but okay. When people try to train to

but okay. When people try to train to failure, and this has been tested out in the research literature, they usually

automatically leave one to two reps in the tank, even three reps in the tank.

And even trained even resistance trained subjects when you tell them to train a failure or leave one rep in reserve,

they'll routinely leave actually two to three reps in reserve. So people

underestimate their their abilities to push uh they usually as almost an automatic margin there that the body sort of regulates and governs

>> and sort of automatically prevents you from going. So with that said, I think

from going. So with that said, I think that most people can train to failure without worrying about whether they're

violating the the golden uh guidelines seen in the literature. what it's very common for um the consensus in the exercise science community, even in the

hypertrophy folks to say, "Yeah, leave one to two reps in reserve."

I think that depends on on the exercise.

So, you'd be kind of a fool to be doing lateral raises to to like to think that you can't do partials for lateral raises and and still get some benefit out of it. And you'd be kind of a fool to

it. And you'd be kind of a fool to think, "Yeah, I'm going to do concentration curls here. I'm gonna

leave one to two reps in reserve." No,

that's different. On the other hand, deadlifting benching squatting these sort of a free weight barbell multi-jint types of

movements, oh, they're they're more conducive to leaving one to two reps in the tank. But for single joint isolation

the tank. But for single joint isolation exercises and even machine exercises and lighter loads where it's safe, take it to failure.

Man, >> we have a closing tradition on this podcast where the last guest leaves a question for the next not knowing who they're leaving it for. And the question left for you is how does nature impact

on your life?

>> It it it has quite a big impact.

Um yeah it it has an impact and and obviously the environment is important.

>> I'm wondering through the lens of what you do in terms of you know you know mindset and health and psych you know these kinds of things if you think much about being outside

versus being inside. You know, I've even read some interesting studies around people that run outside versus on a treadmill have more sort of uh have cognitive benefits

because the brain is stimulated more.

>> I think that there there's a good amount of literature on the psychological benefits of of just being

in nature or even getting getting some sun. And I think that there's

sun. And I think that there's epidemiological like population based data showing that the marine communities tend to be the longevity champs.

>> Marine, what does that mean?

>> Uh communities that that live by the ocean are close to the ocean.

And >> probably that all that omega-3 they're eating from the fish >> and that factors in as well for sure.

But that just the kind almost the metaphysical effect of going to the beach, you know, that's got to play in it. And so so yeah, I I I think it

it. And so so yeah, I I I think it definitely has an effect and I think that there are data that we can point to that says it does.

>> Alan, where where should people go right now if they want to learn more from you?

Where where is the best place to follow you for more information as as you continue to investigate and educate on the science of all of the things we've talked about today?

My website is alanaragon.com.

That's the hub of everything. And maybe

my most active social media platform is Instagram. So that is at the Allen

Instagram. So that is at the Allen Aragon.

>> And this book I have in front of me.

When did you write this book?

>> I wrote that thing from Well, it includes the 30 years of experience that I was talking about earlier. Mhm.

earlier. Mhm.

>> So, I've just crammed the 30 years into there. But the actual writing of that

there. But the actual writing of that took from about 20 all the way to 2022.

>> Yeah.

>> Took about two years.

>> So, first published in 2022. And it's

really like a bible. That's kind of the way I describe it. And it has everything in it from what I love about it is you have all these pictures as well.

>> I'm glad you like it. Well, I mean it's like it's it's dare I say it's it's quite like a like a like a nice accessible textbook.

>> Well, there's been a couple of professors who've adopted it and made it a part of their curriculum.

>> Interesting. Doesn't surprise me.

>> Yeah. Hunter Waldman is one of them.

>> Yeah.

>> Thank you so much, Alan. Thank you for doing what you do. Um, people love your message because it's so demystifying in a world that is increasingly mystified by lots of information from lots of different people. So, please do continue

different people. So, please do continue to do what you're doing. And I I uh I'm rooting for you in this new season of life where you're going to get even closer to patients once again and clients once again and be even more hands-on with your community. So, I

highly recommend everybody goes and follows you on Instagram to keep track of how they can join your community and be one of those people that you directly impact with your work. And yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna subscribe to your review

so that I can stay ahead of all of the um the scientific literature as and when it comes out because for me it is quite demystifying. But you you're one of the

demystifying. But you you're one of the great voices in this space of um simplification and understanding. So I

applaud you for that.

>> I think it's all learnable. It's all

teachable. But thank you so much for the opportunity to be on this show. This is

huge. And uh thank you all for tuning in.

>> Thank you. We're done.

[Music] Oh hey oh hey oh hey oh hey oh hey oh hey oh hey oh hey oh hey oh hey oh