The Greatest Lie Ever Told

for those that don't know the two topics I've studied the most are anthropology and history these two Fields have gone on radically different trajectories over

the course of the last century for history it stayed relatively objective barring a few obvious Fields like colonialism history hasn't faced the

plague of obfuscation which completely destroyed the field of anthropology anthropology is a pretty barren field now I was just checking Amazon's top recommendations for books on

anthropology since I was cross referencing it with my own favorite books on that topic I went through the list and realized that unironically three quarters of the top books in

anthropology were literal pseudo science when I say pseudo science I don't mean this as the political attack it's normally used at but rather from the actual scientific definition in that

pseudo science is the replacement of scientific falsification for circular art arguments based off what's basically faith in this case belief in inherent

equality the noble savage and the blank slate the irony is that the people involved project pseudo science onto their opponents and use that as the

dominant Vector to control the discourse I've invented a term named saw which stands for studies in ancient wisdom as I will explain later I believe the 21st

century has already seen a scientific breakthrough on a vastly unparalleled level which we are yet to have recognized I think said breakthrough will create a completely new paradigm

and will completely change history beyond what we understand now what saw started to find in about half a dozen different fields is that the 20th

century pulled off something absolutely incredible the 20th century an era of history with freedom of speech and press with the most information of any era

ever up to its point with the most advanced intellectual instit tions was able to seduce its populations into believing the most absurd lie ever the thing that really shocked me as I

stumbled upon this myself is the sheer enormity of the lie it's so vast that anyone who discovers it themselves feels insane in that they just sense that it

can't be possible let me show you how we've all been complicit in the greatest lie ever told in human history something our descendants will laugh to themselves

that we fell for [Music] one great lie we've believed is that the internet is secure and only recently have we come to realize the danger of

having your info online that's why I use incog the sponsor of today's video data Brokers collect all of your private information like your address birth a

online activity and even your financial information and social security number this information can be sold to companies and government agencies or put

on public search sites to be available for anyone who wants to look it up all of this happens without your knowledge or control the good news is that you can

request for this data to be removed but the bad news is that it could take years to do so manually that's where our sponsor incog comes in they make the

process of taking back control of your information quick and easy their service will work on your behalf to contact these data Brokers and request the removal of your information while

keeping you informed and in the loop the whole time you just create an account Grant in cogy the right to work for you and sit back and watch them work they'll even handle the objections for you in

cogy goes above and beyond to give you back control of your personal information for my fans they're offering you 60% off an annual plan for anyone who clicks the link below and uses the

code what if I'll test they offer a 30-day money back guarantee there's no reason to not click the link and start using incog

Today part one how I stumbled onto this realizing the sheer scale of this lie might be the most important event of my life in some ways one of the purposes of

this channel is to share my own personal journey of trying to disentangle how big this lie is and how I personally tried to intellectually and psychologically

cope with it having this audience helps keep me sane with just the sheer scale of it one half of my brain forgets there's an audience for this journey while the other half tries to monetize

it human nature can be funny sometimes let me tell you how I figured this out although I'm not the first person to notice it there were probably some super based people who knew this whole time

with my guess being old school European Aristocrats like Amor ranor or Herman hopz being the first but the people who were my biggest influences were Kurt

dittle and Edward dut who really showed the structure of how it happened and what went wrong although I don't agree with said authors on everything since they're significantly further right than

me the way I found this is that in high school I could tell adults weren't telling me the full truth about the world both of my parents were conservatives by the time I graduated high school and I had been reading a lot

of history it was obvious to me that the things our era of History believed were in a clear massive disjoint with the rest of human knowledge over history although I didn't realize the sheer

scale of the LIE until later in high school I had a series of questions about the world which got me into studying history and anthropology talking about just these would probably be a good

video in of itself if you folks are interested but some of the questions are why is Latin America or Mexico go poor while America is Rich why did my home

state of Pennsylvania go into decline so harshly why hasn't southeast Asia achieved more as a civilization why did the West rise to Global dominance or why doesn't the Middle East have black

people if you're interested in my answers to these questions look at this text wall in the process of trying to answer these I ended up learning the things I needed for this channel however

one of the biggest black pills I got out of this is that current Academia has no interest in actually explaining how the world works in the process of trying to answer those questions questions that

should be the most underlying variables of global anthropology and Human Geography is that it was incredibly difficult to find the answer I had to read a variety of different books and

put the answers together myself if anthropology was a genuine field there would already be a bunch of books explicitly written on these sorts of topics that entrylevel college students

would have to read in the first year what I consistently found found instead is that Academia ended up pushing for non-falsifiable political narratives for a frame of reference the purpose of the

scientific method is to create tests in which the result of the test proves one Paradigm and disproves another for example a study on which group of white Americans has the highest income by

showing Italian and Jewish Americans have higher incomes than English Americans by looking at the statistics from this we can make the assessment that America is no longer a wasp

oligarchy like it was a century ago go what I consistently found is that anthropology departments were predicated upon cyclical answers which it was physically impossible to break out of

for an example of this and we will go through a lot the belief in human equality was never tested wait that's wrong it was tested dozens of times and turned out to be wrong no one in

Academia actually used any evidence to see if people are all inherently equal in the same ironically taking the faith-based argument from Christianity but starting with different first

princip principle even if these people loathe Christianity instead of saying that life is good in the world is rational under God's plan it moved to equality in not judging others to be a

statement of faith under which all other assumptions are predicated the thing that really horrified me here is that for all of these basic assumptions they were just never tested and when they

were the results were thrown out in fact I believe that this is intentional given that when said assumptions were tested it turned out they were wrong the Imp apption for this are truly enormous in

that what you believe about human nature determines every single aspect of human life whether what you prioritize as an individual person what you hold sacred what you teach in school how you

organize the family workplace governance and anything else you could possibly imagine in short the left just made stuff up about human nature and then used it as a bludgeon to completely

reconstruct Society according to their fantasies as I like to say if you're not basing your assessments of the world off history you're just making stuff up the first place I stumbled into this was

seeing that Academia had no interest in explaining the questions above a lot of them they literally just didn't care for why Pennsylvania had failed so hard I legitimately did not find a real

explanation and instead had to rely off basic folk wisdom around where I grew up in Philly this is important because over 100 million Americans got screwed over by the collapse of the Rust Belt and if

Academia was honest they would try to figure out why so it wouldn't happen again same with why the Middle East doesn't have black people for Latin America's poverty and the West's civilizational dominance the authorities

told me that Latin America was destroyed due to extractive Colonial systems and the West Rose to dominance due to oppressing the third world as I studi those topics myself I found this hard to

believe due to reasons which I explain in this text wall what I consistently found is that every single thing in the leftist Paradigm leads back to the same conclusion that being that the oppressed

could not be held responsible for failure while the oppressors or successful always had to be held responsible for any negatives it's just an intellectual shell game in which you

have to rationalize every single aspect of the world in order to reach that result this is argument from Faith as I've said a few times before it's literally in direct contradiction with

the stated purpose of the scientific method the great irony here is that the people pushing this claim to be the science and anyone who contradicts them is pseudo science even if the people who contradict them use the scientific

method more than they do one of the things I found which basically resulted in me stumbling into creating the acronym saw or studies in ancient wisdom

is that I realized over 99% of History agreed on a series of rational precepts and starting points that our society disagreed with horrifyingly our society

had made this completely taboo and often in much of the Western World illegal to question things that were just completely obvious for all of human history to break down some of the

beliefs almost everyone else in history had except us and took to be completely obvious which are taboo a question today the first being that there are inherent biological differences between men and

women next is some inherent biological reality behind class race and ethnicity that progress is not some natural law of the universe but something that only occurs under certain incentive

structures which are rare over history family community and nation is the Bedrock of social life that war is a nasty part of the human condition that we have to accept equality doesn't really exist and some things are

innately better than others that the highest levels of beauty achievement and greatness are pulling from the Divine while the lowest levels are pulling from demonic forces that these do not exist

physically in the way we describe but are underlying archetypal principles or forms that operate over physical matter that human nature is inherently corruptible and requires social traditions to keep us in check that

there is a spirit world and God that the human soul and Consciousness is a force in its own right that human life and happiness is predicated less upon material wealth and more so upon social

relations or values that the universe is a self-reflective emergent phenomena which adapts to different situations to frame this literally everyone else in

history besides us believed all of that stuff even the most educated people in the west at the start of World War I one believed most of the stuff I said above literally every other era in history

besides that believed in them I have a mental heuristic that if someone put Isaac Newton Christ confucious Buddha Thomas aquinus and Aristotle in a room if they agree on something I'm just

going to assume it's true as a baseline that since these people were the greatest Geniuses often coming from civilizations with zero connection to the other figures I use this principle since I don't have infinite computing

power in my brain and I don't have infinite knowledge given I am not God thus I have to develop different mental tools that operate under the assumptions of my lack of information one of the

methods to do that is to find other thinkers more brilliant than I that I cannot understand the depth of their thought and then if I can get them in different contexts to agree on something

in a nearly scientific way I can make a probabilistic bet that what they agree on is probably true this should just be complete common sense but our society hasn't thought thought of it yet the

thing that terrifies me is that our society has no interest in knowing that we are literally the only people ever who believe in this stuff that fits the literal definition of Madness one of my

friends like to say that if you're the only sane person in an insane asylum that makes you the crazy one crazy people don't put a sign on their heads that say I'm crazy the way to find

Madness is to find a person who has no interest in seeing the outside world showing the fantasies in their minds to be incorrect cor one of my friends is a beautiful quote that Madness is the

unhealthy Obsession on a single topic to the detriment of everything else for our civilization I think we have a variety of mental illnesses at once something that probably deserves its own video God

I must have promised to make hundreds of videos by this point however the unhealthy Obsession which is stolen our world's soul is the idea of equality every single idea must be processed with

how it relates to equality how we must organize our society religion philosophy corporations art and literally anything else must Pander to our obsession with equality and the abdication of

responsibility for the defeated the problem is equality by itself is completely antithetical to reality we are stuck in a horrifying darwinist jungle where the strong eat the weak

without remorse the lion is not equal to the deer and the chieftain to the foot soldier As Time began to pass and I read more I realized the people in charge had literally no idea what they were talking

about I cross referenced the scientific ific information which everyone including leftists agreed with against the regime's right to rule and I realize the disconnect is truly enormous let's

look into what the science says today about these sacred cows part two follow the science when I was growing up the school system was borderline obsessed

with increasing knowledge or interest in stem or science math and Tech topics this was partly a cold war Remnant and also a materialist society which saw no

value for the wisdom the humanities teaches the irony is that I'm not particularly that good or interested in science however I do have a policy of trying to read at least a few books on

any given topic and keep up with the scientific consensus of Any Given academic field is however even with all that effort the public is thousands of miles away from what the science says

the people who say follow the science have no clue what the science even is I find it funny how much the educational institutions have failed in this regard this wasn't that hard for me to research

none of the things I'm about to say here should be controversial this is stuff if you interviewed an important academic in any of these fields unless they felt like their job was on the line or that

they'd be socially outcasted they'd tell you immediately you can pick out these sorts of politics in how academics deal with each other in which under certain contexts academics can be incredibly

honest when they think just the peers who know what's up is listening the easiest example of this is the nature versus nurture debate the blue pill era was entirely predicated upon the idea

that nurture was the complete determinant value while nature is irrelevant the thing is that when we actually studied this we found that it was completely incorrect strangely

enough the vast majority of human traits tend to Cluster around being half genetic and we think intelligence might be even more genetic between 2/3 to 80% other traits that are at least partially

genetic are levels of religiosity Charisma what music you listen to how fast you drive and a variety of almost everything else at this point even

legitimate socialists like spolski Katherine Harden John height amongst all others agree that human nature is heavily genetic I have read multiple books written by socialists about trying

to rationalize the new genetic evidence within a socialist framework we found this partly through twin studies in which we look at genetically identical twins separated at Birth they often have

chilling similarities like marrying men with the same names having the same kind of dog or going to vacation at the same places and a bunch of other stuff like that at this point genetics is

completely irrefutable in the evidence is getting stronger by the day the genetic differences between men and women between races and classes have all been completely proven I know five phds

and genetics who all say that biological race and class has been irrefutably proven at this point and again every year we realize more of what we thought was cultural conditioning was really

genetic we have significant scientific evidence that men and women are neurologically different on a genetic basis this is something all of the science agrees with well it completely

contradicts our society's right to rule the genetic data is a ticking time bomb in my opinion given it's become the new scientific consensus and the old ruling

class can only have so much time before this information percolates across the whole society Twitter has become a huge vehicle in spreading this sort of illicit information our entire Society

is built in opposition to this and thus it has mass political ramifications the other worry is that wokeness has given a large part of the population immense

resentment over racial or sexual agendas thus the info coming out that there are significant racial and sexual differences creates immense fodder for a

new wave of sexism or racism my biggest fear for modernity is what I call the closed loop or making a logical argument in which you're right by definition on top of this confusing the finger

pointing at the moon for the moon itself which is using a definition to argue that you're right by definition it's not an uncommon sentiment on the dissident right today to make a racial cast system

based off race and IQ I don't trust this sort of thing since every time in the past we've tried to form a technocratic society based off science the science later turned out to be wrong or missing

a very important piece of context what would happen is that after Society was structured in a certain way like that that decades later it would turn out the science was completely wrong in a very

important way I think a lot of this discourse is being done in a frankly very evil way and that it's not taking into account humility or the fallibility of The Human Condition when the left or

a lot of the right debates they're arguing out of this sense of humanity as a perfect creature who we engineer towards Utopia but we've learned in the

20th century that this sort of line of thinking will inevitably result in totalitarianism no matter how it's applied and when I look at a lot of this discourse about race or sex I'm thinking

you guys don't see how the next immediate conclusion of this idea is is something completely evil and it's a hard point to convey because modernity

can't think in anything except pretty autistic binary logical ideas without the necessary flexibility or synthetic thinking which the real complex World

demand and we really need a tremendous amount of mental flexibility and disarmament in this kind of discourse that we just don't have and until we can move to that point all of this discourse

will end in complete disaster at this point to change topic we have a tremendous amount of scientific study that men and women are markedly different men are less agreeable and

neurotic than women men also systematize and women sympathize men care about things and women care about people I want to use this as an example because saying men and women are the same is the

thing the pre-industrial world would probably Boggle at the most because they would see it as completely insane and the fact that the blue pill era was able to get people to stand behind this point

is a pretty good example to figure out how they argue with this discourse there was basically no research to determine whether or not men and women were the same instead they Ed the argument from

definition the argument from definition is how the blue pill era was able to most easily get the population to believe complete absurdities in that for race or sex as an example The Logical

structure of this argument is that race or sex have social constructions built around them thus they are social constructs and thus they aren't real for

example there are social ideas about the sun thus the sun is a social construct and thus we could get rid of the sun if we wanted this is exactly the intellectual structure they use it's a

really bizarre logical game that doesn't actually make any sense in that the underlying reality of the universe is that the world is real if you don't do what the universe wants you to do it

then punishes you which is why we all work jobs and do things we dislike Every Day Life is a struggle I've taken a course in gender studies and literally studied this topic myself and this is

literally what postmodernist philosophy publicly says the problem is that this is just legitimately completely insane and I think we all really know that I

think this is the philosophic equivalent of a test or the left is pushing something completely ridiculous that we all know is completely ridiculous and they're doing it as a power game to see

how much they can get the population to submit to a legitimate absurdity the next mental trick the blue pill involves is that studying history is of no use for the world today and that we're so

different from the past that nothing in the past is a useful precedent for us now again this is something they never tested or even provided an argument for I've never seen a valid argument for this but it's completely taken over

Academia in that there are basically no Western academics who have tried to use the patterns of History to study the world since the World War II era in Academia it's literally against their

policies to use books written before let's say 1990 since they're outdated this creates a system where insane new ideas can never be falsified what I like to say is that if you're not using

history to understand the world you're just making stuff up that's what happened where instead of a legitimate study what the blue pill era did was Project the fantasies they wanted to

believe onto the social sciences thus they believed that cultural or anthropological differences don't matter anymore since that contradicted the leftist ideal of the whole world moving

towards a unified communist state it's remarkable to see that even studying anthrop ology has become socially taboo if I want to read books on the cultural differences between the Chinese Indian

and Western Civilization I need to read books at least 70 years old since nothing has been written on that topic since then at the same time there are no recent books on the anthropology of

America I basically had to ReDiscover the field of the entirety of American ethnic breakdown since no authors had covered the topic recently with the

exceptions being conservative like Thomas Soul or David hacket Fisher this is important stuff whether or not Wisconsin is German or Missouri is Anglo determines how people live their lives

today and their identities the reason studying anthropology which should be completely innocuous is taboo since it contradicts the left's faith-based argument for Global Unity if the

historic precedent isn't useful it opens up to the injection of leftist faith-based arguments such as progress being innate or progress just naturally happens and doesn't require incentives

to occur this is an idea from Hegel or Marx that wasn't tested same thing with the honest studying of War as a natural part of the human condition alongside equality being good for its own sake in

each Case by removing the historic reference they were able to inject their religion as the dominant assumption one of the more Primal areas where the science doesn't lead to our current

Paradigm is that our current vision of the world is that Society is based off the mechanistic pure materialist worldview in general we exist in a

strange zombie culture in which the society has a 100 plus year lag from the science itself the great irony is that modern physics sounds a lot like the

traditional philosophy of magic quantum entanglement sounds a lot like the law of sympathy or a magic principle from the Middle Ages that the Universe has these strings connecting different parts

of the universe modern physics is insane with space and time being the same which can rip apart with Chaos Theory we found that we can't predict the movement of particles since it's almost as if the

particles are making a decision in real time that we're not privy to some particles go back in time and others just jump in and out of existence there's a significant amount of

scientific evidence that Consciousness affects reality the last Nobel Prize in physics says that reality is not locally real or that the Universe does not exist independently from perception this is

stuff pretty similar to what the esoteric schools of world religions taught any honest physicist will admit that we have basically no idea what's going on our society is philosophically

still stuck with Marxist materialism or the philosophy of 200 years ago that the universe is made up entirely of physical atoms ideas don't really matter and the

only thing that drives history is economics which leads us to progress again this is another example of the left pushing what's a Marxist faith based argument that they never tested

scientists today agree that Consciousness is real and can affect the world thus the world cannot be purely materialist by definition this materialist vision of the world is

predicated upon a warped version of Newtonian physics which has also been dethroned over a century ago our philosophic view of the human condition is dominated by Skinner's behaviorism

and rational Choice Theory this is an idea that humans don't have innate nature and that dopamine incentives craft everything rational Choice theory is that humans are innately rational and thus choose whichever choice is better

for them economically what science has consistently shown recently is that humans are basically monkeys human behavior is a reflection of primate

Behavior to our very core how humans have politics wage war mate make art have friendships and almost anything else can be found in our ape relatives

this gets to a really scary degree where human rituals like hugging or saluting or certain ways we mate or show political subservience can all be found

in chimps gorillas or bonobos humans aren't the little robots that respond to stimuli that our society thinks but huge very complex beings who have subconscious who go very deep the

subconscious makes up something like 90% of our mental power we've found in studies the two things that make people the happiest aren't wealth but instead religion and Community the human mind

evolutionarily massively wires us towards love being a huge priority love is a physiological need for humans and all other mammals without it our brains

and bodies literally start to wither away this is in direct opposition to how modernity is structured to prioritize material against the spiritual or social

humans are motivated enormously by sex more so than money expecting humans to be rational about sex is like expecting a dog to be rational about steak this is another thing modernity gets wrong

you'll never see a history book talk about sexual physical psychological or emotional needs but we know that those Drive human nature to its most profound

core humans are controlled by vast subconscious forces that account for 90% of the population for 90% of people they rationalize whatever their emotional

state is only around 10% of the population makes rational decisions humans are self-interested but we're rarely rational from studies people make a decision first for subconscious

reasons and then their conscious mind is a tool to rationalize the choice to make them look good to others the book The Elephant in the brain talks about this and it's one of the best anthropology

books I've read all of this completely flies in the face of the idea which underlies our society that human nature is naturally good or perfect the science

finds humanity is very very flawed an example of this and one of the most absurd lies of the blue pill era is that that tribal peoples are peaceful this is

especially ridiculous to me in that all the European and other peoples with Records who arrived at any given tribal area said that the peoples there waged

war however the left had an active conspiracy to hide that tribal peoples are violent hierarchical misogynistic and other things the degree of lying that went on here is extraordinary the

left claimed for decades that the yandam Mani peoples of the Amazon were peaceful in reality 40% of the male population dies every generation in war making the

yanam Mani one of the most violent peoples ever known in human history similar lies took place over a variety of peoples and in most cases in tribal

groups between 40 to 20% of young men die each generation in Warfare humans like all animals are stuck in a brutal Darwinism not the exception one of the

best anthropology books I've ever read is Lawrence keeley's book War before civilization which covers this it's such a good book given it goes to the evidence of tribal Warfare from both

current anthropology and archaeology in so many places the left got caught with a completely ridiculous lie for example saying the Mayans were peaceful while the reality when we started looking at

Maya art is it's mostly about war sacrifice and genocide they said Native Americans were peaceful before European contact and then we find archaeology of

mass Native American genocides and mass Graves of hundreds of dead people they said that the Native Americans were peaceful before European contact and then we find records in archaeology of

mass Native American gen burning cities and mass Graves of hundreds of dead soldiers when I was in elementary school around age 10 my school textbook said

that the iroy were peaceful the insanity of that is that the iroy a one 1,000 M stretch of the American Midwest from Buffalo to St Louis in order to take the

beaver pelts of that area that's legitimately insane at this point I've seen the left lie so massively on a variety of topics that I have literally no faith in any of the other things they

say an example of this is when they found the genetics of the first inhabitants of Britain the scientists said they were black the reality is that they had copper skin like most modern Mediterraneans but they changed this to

be black to mess with racists 23 and me openly admitted to adding fake black ancestry to the results of white supremacist figures to mess with them the left feels literally no remorse for

lying and has been caught on records doing it dozens of times needi remind you back in the 1940s the left tried to suppress any information at the

atrocities coming out of Stalin or ma countries and leftist anthropology believes that we all migrated Out of Africa 50,000 years ago and then there

was no prehistoric migrations or major Wars and that's just legitimately ridiculous to think that for all of human history before the rise of the Europeans everyone stood in their little

place and no one fought each other or moved around and once genetics results came out over the 21st century we realize that that's completely ridiculous where genocide and war is the

norm where for example Ice Age Europe was genocided seven times over another really jarring example of this is that the most popular anthropology book of the 20th century that being Margaret

me's coming of age in Samoa Margaret has later turned out to be a CIA asset a theme which we'll tease out later but she wrote about Samoa being a sexually liberated Paradise Samoans would sleep

around without jealousy the reality and something that we knew for over a century up to that point is that Samoa was the opposite a society obsessed with sexual Purity a woman's would be

publicly checked on her wedding night to attest to her virginity adulter is rep publically clubbed to death Margaret me was basically openly lying something she probably knew and didn't care for the

final two examples of horrible lies which personally affected me as a child the first is that when I went to school they taught us in class that the healthiest food to eat was carbohydrates

and that lean meat was the least healthy they also said that fat was the main cause for obesity well sugar was fine it later turned out the sugar and wheat industries were in bed with with the US

government and Academia they had paid for the results they wanted and then the government education pushed out those results on to the public what later turned out to be true is the exact

opposite lean meats are one of the healthiest foods someone can consume fat is fattening but it does actually fill someone up while sugar is the opposite keeping you hungry what all of this

covered up was the rise of seed oils and high fructose corn syrup due to getting the wrong advice obesity skyrocketed vastly faster in America thesea V other

Western countries where this didn't happen again the elites massively lied I grew up in the Rust Belt it was an area that used to be the wealthiest place in the world and then as factories moved to

Mexico or China the region went into rapid decline Philadelphia has a lower population today than it did in 1950 this was something that was completely obvious to me growing up since I saw the

Decay everywhere the elites said that the free trade was good by definition and would cause progress for everyone this was an economic position held with religious certainty where it was a

definition from definition you weren't allowed to question it however when the Rust Belt crashed and the quality of life for the average American collapsed precipitously from 1970 onwards this is

what the elite did firstly they said that it wasn't happening then they said they would fix it which they didn't then they said you were a bad person for noticing and you should be grateful that you helped progress happen I I have a

friend who invented a term I love called Pinker ISM or since there are more toilets in Africa thus progress has happened and thus the complete collapse of American society is fine the elites

completely lied about the decline in quality of life for the average American until Trump in Co forced their hand bringing up any of these questions at the time would make you socially shamed

and outcasted from society I have still run into lots of very educated people who think that quality of life hasn't declined since the 60s then they said anyone who knows noticed was a bad person for a very recent example of all

of this let's see how the Biden Administration just added nearly a million jobs to the employment stats that never existed that's a large enough

numeric discrepancy that it has to be an outright lie not a mistake they had been campaigning off fake stats for the whole Biden presidency and then felt no shame when they were called out furthermore

this is just what we know about what else have they been lying about something else I've thought up myself is how the rise in digital information about human nature will probably

revolutionize the world as of now the internet and these cell phones create an unfiltered look at Human Nature that's not comparable to anything before in human history as the amazing book

everyone lies talks about people will share things they won't even tell their closest friends with Google search the internet sees what poor people watch how they react emotionally to things what

motivates or interests them if they want to be even more predatory these Tech companies or the government could listen in on our conversations hear the speed of your breathing as you sleep or watch

any moment of your life completely legally I think this information will shed a new light on human nature in a way that's historically unprecedented it will paint an unflattering light but a

real one I think the ramifications on philosophy the social sciences and human nature will be the equivalent to the axial age or how Buddha confucious L and

Socrates all lived at the same time the created a Quantum shift in understanding of human nature and human society which I think will happen soon part three how the LIE happened the question I posited

at the beginning of the video still bugs me how come a society with the most information ever with lots of people with very high IQs and freedom of speech

was able to push the most ridiculous lie ever told for nearly a person's entire lifetime I want to remind all of us about this most of us were complicit in

this lie in one way or another I know I was I believed most of these silly things as a child as did everyone I knew once you realize we all accepted these

lies it forces you to look at the post-world War II era very differently the short answer is I think the liberal West had more in common with stalinist

or Soviet Russia than we want to give Justice which was actually a European reactionary talking point as B likes to say in the 19th century faith in God was

the unifying force in society in the 20th the state was and in the 21st it will likely be networks attached to the internet we only realize this in retrospect but the 20th century involved

giving unelected bureaucratic authorities ludicrous amounts of power which was almost always abused in absurd ways which we only later realized

through the networks the internet gave us this is something that the historical authors I love to read from the World War era like amori duror CS Lewis James

Burnham George Orwell Carol Quigley Spangler and William mcneel all agree on that the West over theor Wars gave the bureaucracy enormous power without check

and they all agreed that it was the greatest danger to Western civilization of anything what James Burnham and Sam Francis especially predicted is that the bureaucracy would start to warp and

break Society in their self interest in ways that people at the time wouldn't be able to realize the true extent of what both of those authors did very well was

they showed how a society's religion ideology and how it processed the world is all a reflection of its Elite self-interest I'll explain it in this way in the 20th century the only way to

coordinate was through the bureaucracy the television newspapers and universities created an illusion of free information but the reality is that these were all controlled by small C

balls of certain types of people probably less than a 100 people in 1985 controlled the flow of the vast majority of information in the Western World this

was an era in which that type of person was assorted by the college system and were overwhelmingly left of center people would joke about how conservatives would talk at the liberal

Elite destroying Society but even the most radical conservatives probably didn't understand how crazy what was actually going on was we only realized how powerful this was in retrospect and

that the internet does the opposite let's look at the story about Venezuelan gangs taking over a town in Colorado or the Haitian supposedly eating cats in Ohio in a pre- internet world if the

media chose not to cover those stories people would just never know about them one of the interesting things I find anthropologically is that people's concepts of places like Africa are

colored by what vloggers say about those countries now this creates a raw sense of those places while we found the mainstream media in previous decades when they went to third world countries

were very heavily sanitizing what they chose to show the public an important Point here is that for most of History the society was racist and sexist and hierarchical and that stuff because that

was a reflection of the people in those societies while in the post World War II era the elites actively pushed against those things which is why the society was less of any of those negative traits

because it wasn't really about the people in the society it was about a small ruling class projecting their social ideas onto the rest this is why a suicidal cult that believes reality

doesn't exist was able to take over the West while the vast majority of people in the west disagreed with those sentiments we can see this in Western Europe in which well pulled consistently

three4 of Europeans have wanted no immigration but since the uni party supports it it continues to happen Sam Huntington did a study of the social values of the average American in the

1990s he found that if America was a real democracy into the 20th century reflecting the Public's desires it would basically be a theocracy in which homosexuality would be illegal

Christianity taught in schools in the state enforced Christianity since that's what most Christians supported into the 1990s but a small agnostic Elite meant that the cultural current went in the

opposite direction we've consistently found a lot of these were pushed by the CIA modern art modern feminism Margaret me and other things were funded by the

CIA this is stuff the CIA openly publicly has announced as well when we look at what the CIA was funding they were consistently pushing blank slatest

ideas this was since for the government and people in power the blank slate makes them more powerful since the engineering of human nature to Perfection offers a perfect cart blanch

in order to keep expanding the power of the state Forever on top of this this it removes the obvious fear that concentrating power in the hands of the government like this naturally leads to

tyranny because human nature is perfect in progressing to see the other side of this exact equation the CIA sat on their discoveries of the spirit world for decades I know why I said it's

absolutely insane but watch my video on the topic this always shocked me given if I discovered a huge spiritual Dimension scientifically I would want to share it with the public to create an

enormous positive social spiritual Revolution however even when the CIA did release project Gateway 50 years after it was done They removed the page on its

implication for world religions which the guy who ran the experiments had to release without their consent that's since a world with religion and God is one where people need the state and the

authorities less when all is said and done for something like this we can partly believe that the authorities pushed this well at the same time this is a game that both sides played into

the public happily ate up all of these absurdities that since the public desperately wanted it to be true it's no surprise that knowing human nature for what it is that if a society had

infinite wealth it would then allow itself to become infinitely stupid we wanted to believe that everyone is equal that we were all blank slates that the scary demons of the past didn't reflect

anything today that women were the same as men that all nations were the same and half a dozen other silly things I'd like to stop here and give the West a legitimate amount of credit that when it

became an incredibly wealthy Society rather than most Empires which spend that on luxuries and sex slaves and gladiatorial games and that stuff the

West used its enormous wealth to try to help people and make the world a better place and push for people's Collective good it horribly backfired and became a

suicidal nihilistic death cult but I do want to give the West Credit if you study the Old Testament you find the consistent pattern that Hard Times men look to God then life gets better due to

that and then men leave God then the world Goes to Hell and the cycle restarts this is just who we are as a species and thinkers as far back as

Herodotus iben Calon or Plato talk about this eternal pattern we became such a wealthy society that we simply lost the desire to understand reality we grew fat while the elite fed us the most

ridiculous lies it's funny the world's a lot less real when there's not the threat of Extinction at your throat if I'm going to be perfectly blunt the reason I went down this rabbit hole is I

realized we were screwed if we didn't I'm a young guy stuck in a society and collapse thus I'm stuck here for a long time and have an incentive to figure stuff out I can understand why an older

person would just say let me die in peace my motivation to figure this out comes from self-interest and our current elite doesn't have the self-interest to change since they're in power let's not

pretend that if the world wasn't going to hell we wouldn't all be stuck in Plato's Rave we are all complicit at least somewhat in the greatest lie ever told I like the metaphor for Plato's

Cave not Rave in that Plato was trying to convey how most people are stuck in the outward trappings of things while being completely incapable of seeing the underlying forms of reality I think

that's a generally accurate summation of human nature over history in which the general population has myths which act as rough approximations of their worldview which can't convey the

complexity of an underlying reality however I prefer a slight variation to this let's look at the Matrix The Matrix was more real than its authors intended or I think even understood given the

writers were leftists and later trans The Matrix is real and that the 20th century was a false reality which the authorities enforced on the populace the populace went along with it since it was

so comforting compared to the reality anyone who questions said false reality which the authorities forced on the population would be outcasted from the system either socially or economically

or even sometimes thrown in jail the post World War II West evolved into a greater social tyranny than the Catholic church ever was we are living in The Matrix and most people are still glued

into this false reality that never really existed a sort of parallel Dimension rather than Plato's Cave we live in fuko's cardboard box in that the modern world isn't even cool enough to

be a cave is a cardboard box to illustrate its artificiality sterility and boredom it's crazy to read books from previous history as recently as World War I back then people saw the

world as incredible mystical beautiful and heroic now our Elite hates any genuine feeling Duality mystery or drama prove me wrong our society hates heroism

romance mystery honor the mystical and Dramatical believing in anything is cringe the world that the managers push is an inhuman cruel controlled and depressing place a place where life

itself is boring sterile and nothing is worth anything once we realize we're stuck in a cardboard box Beyond which is the whole world in all its insanity is the day we truly start to live once we

can move past the comforting lives we were fed even if it's excruciatingly painful and hard we will start to be able to truly live for the first time it's getting to be less of a choice as the rain is starting to melt through the

cardboard box we'll end up wet either way so why not make the jump