The Infinite Universe

the infinite Universe the universe is everything all of matter and space but how much matter is there is there limited matter or unlimited matter is

there limited space or unlimited space or in other words is the universe finite or infinite can matter be infinitely divided into smaller pieces or is there a fundamental particle likewise can

matter be infinitely united into ever larger pieces or is there a largest object in the universe what about space is it possible for space to be devoid of matter or does space always contain

smaller particles and then there's the question of Origins did the universe have a beginning or has the universe always been here this video will argue that the

only reasonable conclusion is that the universe is infinite and eternal never had a beginning let's start with space space is the three-dimensional extent in

which all material objects are located or simply put space is a synonym for everywhere space is nothing all objects have a location in space with respect to

other objects but is space finite or infinite let's try to imagine a finite space Oh wait we can't it's impossible if space were finite then it wouldn't

really be everywhere it would just be another object with matter inside of it the idea of finite space cannot even be visualized what would be on the other

side of finite space clearly space or everywhere must be infinite it makes no sense to try and claim otherwise if space is finite then what's on the

other side of it matter now on to matter matter occupies space and has three-dimensional shape anything you can point to is matter apples clouds rocks

Stars birds and everything else all of it is matter but how much matter is there in the universe there are two options want a specific amount of matter surrounded by endless empty space two an

infinite amount of matter located throughout endless space if the universe had only a finite amount of matter then we would apparently be very special compared to everywhere else because

everywhere else outside of the finite clump of matter would be nothing but endless empty space this type of egocentric thinking has always failed Us

in the past humans have always wanted to limit the size of the universe as much as possible so that they can feel more special first there was the Flat Earth

with the Stars Sun and Moon suspended in a firmament then there was the round earth that was located at the center of everything with the sun and all the

planets revolving around it but this was eventually disproven the Earth is not important at all it's just one of many planets which is orbiting a star the Sun

but did it end there no of course not astronomers needed to keep their Universe finite and measurable so they went on to claim that the entire universe consists only of the stars that we can see in the Milky Way

but once again the infinite universe made fools of them because it was then discovered that what is now called the Milky Way is just one of billions of

galaxies did they finally give up on the finite Universe nope now they have the Big Bang Theory which claims that there is a finite amount of galaxies that are contained inside an expanding sphere of

space or so-called SpaceTime yes the common version of Big Bang Theory not only claims that there is a finite amount of matter but even

that space is finite finite space is a definite impossibility you'll notice that each step of the way that most people throughout history have been trying to deny that the universe is

infinite and that there is no Center which is more likely that there's a countable amount of objects surrounded by infinite nothing or an uncountable

amount in all directions of space both ideas might sound strange at first glance but it's either one or the other there are no other options finite

space is not even an option since it can't be visualized and makes no sense never in our everyday experience do we ever come across anything like an

infinite void there is absolutely no evidence of such a monster all we ever come in contact with are objects matter and based on that it would obviously make more sense to conclude that that's

what we would find if we were to travel past what is currently claimed to be the farthest Gap galaxy in the universe we would simply find even more matter whether it be more galaxies or something

else not an infinite sea of pure nothingness both logic and history clearly support this another problem is that a finite system of matter surrounded by nothing

should just simply disperse and fly apart there has to be matter surrounding and constraining all matter in order for it to stay together matter is not solid another

question is whether matter is composed of infinitely smaller parts or if there's an elementary particle that comprises everything else an elementary particle would have to have no

constituent parts and be perfectly solid the first to propose such an idea was Lucius followed by his pupil democratus this philosophy is referred

to as atomism but is it really possible for something to have no constituent Parts can anything really be perfectly solid everything in our every every day

experience is made out of smaller pieces of matter a leaf is composed of cells cells are composed of DNA DNA is composed of atoms atoms are composed of

even smaller particles etc etc is there really any reason to think that it ever comes to an end not really such an assumption is idealistic and

unjustified there's no such thing as a perfectly solid object in the real world only in the imaginary world in order for something to bend or deform in any way it requires smaller

subunits in reality there are no true solids because all matter is composed of smaller matter that is what our everyday experience tells us and there is no evidence to the

contrary the largest structures in the observable universe are Galaxy clusters and some might assume that it ends there but once again we need to use a little

logic if all objects are comprised of smaller objects at infinitum then wouldn't the reverse also be true would wouldn't that mean that all objects are also themselves a part of larger

objects like before there is simply no logical reason to assume that there's a largest object which is not a part of something even bigger if the universe is consistent and logical then matter being

infinitely microscopic implies that it must also be infinitely macroscopic as well there are no weird inconsistencies in reality we again go back to Everyday

experience all objects in our everyday experience are comprised of smaller objects and are themselves a part of larger ones Galaxy clusters galaxies stars planets plants molecules atoms

particles etc etc therefore we can logically assume that matter gets larger and larger just like it gets smaller and smaller to claim otherwise is

inconsistent matter always contains smaller pieces of matter and is itself a part of larger matter space is not empty as for space at first glance it may seem like space

is empty and does not contain any smaller pieces of matter heck it even seems like the air is not made out of anything smaller air like all other matter is made out of smaller

molecules but what about the space between those air molecules what about the space outside of the Earth's atmosphere does that contain any smaller

pieces of matter or is it an empty void could it be that so-called empty space also contains infinitely smaller particles as well in order for something

to move it needs to be physically pushed against by something else hitting a pool ball against another one is a good example everything in the universe works by cause and

effect likewise what at first glance appear to be action at a distance forces such as gravity and magnetism must also be caused by physical interactions in

the Micro World After All there's really no such thing as a force force is what something does not what something is the universe would not work in the

orderly mechanical way that it does if there were no smaller particles between all objects in other words all objects have smaller pushers and then those ones have even smaller ones and so on and so

forth add infinum so-called solid matter and so-called empty space both containing infinitely smaller parts means that

everything is interconnected in a sense it means that the universe is an infinitely complicated machine that works strictly by physical cause and effect mechanisms this way of viewing the

universe can finally make sense out of seemingly spooky interactions such as gravity and magnetism whereas the alternative view empty space

cannot space always contains smaller pieces of matter light another phenomena that can be explained is light light is caused by wave motion and this wave

motion requires a physical medium of particles to propagate through just like sound does but sound waves propagate through air molecules water molecules Etc whereas light waves propagate

through an ether which is composed of subatomic particles light is mediated by wave motion propagating through a medium of subatomic particles commonly known as

ether light is caused by the motion of matter just like other properties of matter such as sound and heat are caused by the motion of matter if all space contains smaller matter then that

subatomic matter can serve as The Ether medium through which the wave motion passes when The Ether particles come in contact with the eyes then that sends an

Impulse to the brain then the Mind becomes aware of a limited range of light and color and now we reach the question of Origins was there ever a moment of creation as almost all

religions have been claiming throughout history to make such a claim is to say that something can come from nothing is this possible can matter really ever

just appear out of nowhere can a tree just instantly appear or does it gradually grow from a seed by having more atoms added to it clearly the latter is the case that

is how everything works in reality it's all really just things moving around and pushing against other things everything in nature is recycled when we grow old

then our atoms will leave our body and become a part of other objects nothing is ever truly created matter is eternal and is always in motion motion the parts of matter are eternally

recycled there is absolutely no evidence that matter can be magically conjured out of nothing or turned into nothing on the contrary all of the overwhelming evidence tells us that the universe is

mechanistic and that its material parts are eternally recycled the Big Bang is a big myth so in reality matter cannot be created or

destroyed the miracle of creation is only possible in religious mythologies such as the big Bang Theory the Big Bang is really just pseudo scientific creationism and it's not really

supported by any evidence as is often claimed it was originally a way for its creator George lamat a Catholic priest to insert religious Concepts into

science and that's precisely what he did Creo X neilo is a religious concept not a scientific one the matter was invited to London in order to take part in a meeting of the British Association on

the relation between the physical un universe and spirituality there he proposed that the Universe expanded from an initial point a singularity AKA nothing which he

called the Primeval Atom and developed in a report published in nature latter himself also described his theory as the cosmic egg exploding at the moment of

the creation it became better known as The Big Bang Theory a term coin by Fred ho a phenomenon known as red shift is often used to try and support this

Theory red shift allegedly indicates that galaxies are being caused to move away from each other because of the expansion of space however there is a rational alternative to the expanding

space explanation it's called tired light as the vibration wave motion that we perceive as light propagates through its medium the ather it eventually weakens

especially while having to pass through various gases and will therefore shift to the Red Spectrum incidentally this also explains why the night sky isn't filled with

infinite Starlight it's because light vibrations don't propagate forever they come in contact with objects that cause the vibration to weaken so this expansion of space idea is based on an

irrational interpretation of red shift tired light is a rational explanation of red shift whereas expanding space is a very strange en counterintuitive one rational

explanations are always preferable to magical surrealistic ones another problem is dark energy Dark Energy allegedly makes up

68.3% of the observable universe it is claimed that dark energy is causing the alleged expansion of the universe to accelerate however not only is there no evidence for this alleged Dark Energy

but even in theory there literally cannot be any evidence for it why well because energy is not even a real thing at all energy is only an abstract

concept which is used in mathematics it therefore does not make any sense to claim that 68.3% of the observable universe is composed of a dark concept

this is a logical fallacy called reification the light spectrum a chart of the different pressure waves of ather ordered by wavelength the so-called Cosmic

microwave background radiation is also used as evidence even though this has absolutely nothing to do with the big bang light radiation acquires a physical

ether medium so what this really means is that there is a physical medium of vibrating particles throughout space ironically a lot of pre-big Bang Theories actually predicted the

temperature of the observable universe much more accurately than the Big Bang Theory did so the CMB cannot be used as evidence for a big bang it really has

nothing to do with it at all if the universe was never created in a big bang then the only rational alternative is that the Universe has simply always been here it is

eternal the CMB is claimed to be the Afterglow of the Big Bang but in reality there is no reason to make such an assumption conclusion the universe is

all that is or was or ever will be it contains unlimited matter and boundless space Infinity forever

[Music]