The Problems with Regulating Hate Speech | Jordan Peterson
By John Anderson Media
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Who defines hate speech?**: The problem with regulating hate speech is that those who would define 'hate' are likely to be power-mad individuals seeking to control others' language, rather than sensible people. [00:27], [00:42] - **The impossible standard of not offending anyone**: If the rule is not to offend anyone, even one person in a large group, it becomes an impossible standard, leading to the inability to say anything at all. [01:10], [01:43] - **Speech regulation leads to societal stagnation**: Being unable to say offensive things equates to not being able to properly negotiate through the future, which ultimately causes everyone to suffer. [02:10], [02:15] - **Blind naivety in discourse**: The idea that it would be better if no one was ever offended stems from a pathological naivety that willfully refuses to see reality and imposes this blindness on others. [02:26], [02:47]
Topics Covered
- Who Defines Hate? The Inevitable Consequence of Regulation.
- Why "No Offense" Destroys Future Negotiation.
- Is "Pathological Naivete" Driving Calls for Censorship?
Full Transcript
is there such a thing as hate speech yes
obviously people say Terrible Things
reprehensible things quasi criminal
things even all the time brutal and some
of them cause a lot of trouble so the
idea that there's hateful speech it's
like yeah okay that's self-evident no
problem well let's regulate it okay fair
enough because it's hateful you know
maybe we rather that there wasn't any of
it okay no
problem who defines hate
well we'll worry about that later it's
like no you won't that's actually the
problem here's the answer to who defines
hate those people that you would least
want to have Define it that would be the
inevitable consequence of the
legislation because sensible people
won't have anything to do with that like
people who are power mad will gravitate
to that domain to make an ethical case
to exercise their controlling power over
the language of other people no and I've
had journalists say well what makes you
think that your right to free speech
trumps the right of someone to not be
offended and I think that's really the
level of our political discourse okay so
we'll run a little thought experiment so
I'm talking to one person I'm talking to
you and the rule is I don't get to
offend you okay maybe we can still have
a discussion about something difficult
but let's say I'm talking to 10 people
and and about an important thing now I
have to make sure that I don't say
anything def despite the fact that this
is an important and contentious issue
that I don't say anything that offends
even one of those 10
people okay maybe I can even manage that
what if I'm talking to a thousand people
there's going to be someone in that
thousand people there's going to be
someone who's offended at the mere fact
that I
exist so it's an impossible standard
it's like well you can't say anything
offensive okay fine then you can't say
anything okay so what you don't get to
say anything because no one should be
offended well then you don't get to
think well what happens if if you don't
think well then you can't negotiate your
way through the future and you fall into
a pit and so does everyone else so
that's where that all ends up you can't
say offensive things equals you cannot
negotiate your way properly through the
future equals everyone
suffers W that's a bad that's a bad
strategy so and it's and it's all
covered up with well you know it' be
better if no one was ever offended
it's like well who thinks that you know
how naive you have to be to think that
how you have to be pathologically naive
which is the kind of naive that you
could have grown out of but you
willfully refused to because you weren't
willing to see what was in front of your
face and then you impose that blind
naivity on everyone else because you
don't want to allow them to upset your
like Rosy view your rosy view of
yourself in the world there's it's just
there's no end to how terrible that
is
Loading video analysis...