Why Climate Change Isn’t the End of the World with Dr. Hannah Ritchie - Factually! - 254
By Adam Conover
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Climate change is not the end of the world**: Despite the dire warnings and inaction on climate change, the world is not ending. We must strive for a future that not only averts disaster but also fosters a healthier planet overall. [00:44], [01:13] - **Renewable energy is now cheaper than fossil fuels**: Over the last decade, the price of solar has fallen by 90% and wind by 70%, making low-carbon energy sources cheaper than fossil fuels. This aligns economic interests with climate action. [07:39], [08:00] - **Air pollution causes millions of premature deaths**: Air pollution, both indoor and outdoor, is responsible for millions of premature deaths annually. Addressing this externality of burning fossil fuels is crucial for public health. [28:06], [28:49] - **Food systems have massive environmental impacts**: Our food systems contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, biodiversity loss, and water pollution. Farming is the biggest user of water globally. [32:05], [32:26] - **Focus on big climate actions, not small ones**: Many people misplace their efforts on minor environmental actions like recycling, missing the bigger impacts of dietary changes or switching to electric vehicles. Prioritizing significant actions is key. [46:45], [47:10] - **The transition to a sustainable future is an opportunity**: Shifting to a sustainable future is not a sacrifice but an opportunity that leads to better, healthier, and more prosperous lives. This transition offers abundance rather than scarcity. [57:34], [01:01:37]
Topics Covered
- Challenging Climate Fatalism: The World Isn't Ending, and We Can Act
- The Dramatic Shift: Renewable Energy is Now Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels
- Don't Wait for Perfect: Embrace 'Good Enough' Climate Solutions
- We can't rip up capitalism, but we can fix it.
- A Better World is Possible, Not a Sacrifice
Full Transcript
hello and welcome to factually I'm Adam
Conover thank you so much for joining me
on the show again you know the climate
situation is very bad in order to stop a
laundry list of dire consequences we
need to keep the rise in temperature to
no more than 1.5 degrees C higher than
pre-industrial times and currently we're
on track for warming by almost 2.7 Dees
by 2100 like I said that is bad and
given this situation given the stunning
inaction we have seen for decades you
could be forgiven for writing it all off
and finding a nice hole to bury yourself
in as things get worse until you die
there's an attitude a lot of people have
right now that basically says the world
is ending and there's nothing we can do
about it so let's all give up but guess
what that is not true the world is not
ending it is going to exist tomorrow
whether it's better or worse and you are
going to have to live in it and
personally I'm too much of a fan of my
life and of planet Earth itself to give
up I don't think it's an environmental
position to say oh we're [ __ ] there's
nothing we can do because there is
always something we can do the problem
is figuring out what that is and to
answer that question we need to
understand clearly where we are how we
got here and just what is actually
possible it's not about optimism and
it's not about pessimism it's about
understanding the reality of the world
we live in and what we can actually do
about it and you know what the best cure
for despair is to grab a shovel and
Pitch the [ __ ] in and our guest today is
going to help us do that she is Deep In
The Weeds on all of the data and she has
written a deeply data informed book that
we can use as a baseline to help us
attack the challenges we face in
creating a sustainable future but before
we get into it I just want to remind you
that if you want to support this show
you can do so on patreon head to
patreon.com adamc Conover five bucks a
month get you every episode of this
podcast ad free we got a bunch of other
great Community features as well and if
you want to come see me I'm the road if
you like standup comedy head to Adam
con.net coming up soon I'm heading to La
Hoya California San Jose California
Indianapolis a lot of other dates as
well head to adamc con.net for tickets
and tour dates and now my guest today is
Dr Hannah Richie she's a data scientist
who works as a lead researcher and
Deputy editor of the indispensable
website our world in data a researcher
in global development at Oxford and
she's the author of the new book not the
end of the world how we can be the first
generation to build a sustainable planet
I know you're going to love this
conversation please welcome Dr Hannah
Richie Hannah thank you so much for
being on the show no thanks very much
for having me uh looking forward to the
conversation yeah so you have a new book
out called not the end of the world uh
it's we're at a time where so many
people talk about the world that we live
in as though it's about to end oh who
knows if there'll even be another
presidential election oh who knows if a
retirement oh the world's not even going
to be around that long we have this
fatalism about almost everything uh
which is a I think a very odd Viewpoint
to have um it's a very interesting thing
about our time that so many people feel
that way uh but it really seems Seems to
stem first of all from the climate
crisis that we've you know I was brought
up knowing you know watching uh kids
cartoons uh about how uh climate change
is coming and we're ruining the planet
and we have to do something and then for
the last you know 30 plus years of my
life I've watched very little be done
and so I understand why people would say
okay well that means we're screwed
because I was told about this crisis as
a kid and we're still not doing as much
as we should be and therefore you know
we're going to be a member of the last
generation you hear people say I you
have a new book out called not the end
of the world uh which takes the opposite
Viewpoint in its title uh I love that
tell me about it why do you uh have that
view that it's not the end of the world
yeah I mean the title is called not the
end of the world and I think it's
matters how you see it I mean the the
book tackles seven big environmental
problems like I think climate change is
the big one that we think of but we we
Face a range of other big environmental
problems as well and I think the title
is not you know oh it's not the end of
the world this is not a big deal no it's
a definitive these are massive problems
but we're going to make sure that this
is not the end of the world because
there are solvable problems I mean I
think if we even if we just focus on the
issue of climate change I think you know
coming from an environmental background
working in this area for years and you
know also speaking to other climate
scientists on this area it feels like
we've done a very fast 180 from you know
not that long ago you know the the
discussion around this was you know ah
is it actually happening or humans
actually causing it we seem to have done
like a 180 towards oh it's too late and
now there's nothing we can do right and
I think and I think um you know I think
we're kind of suffering from this kind
of whiplash of you know what happened in
the last five to 10 years that we've
done a complete 180 from almost semi
denial to it's too late and there's
nothing we can do so you know what I try
to do in the book is lay out yes these
are you know massive and Urgent problems
and if we don't get our act together the
consequences will be really really
catastrophic but there is something we
can do about it and and although we
aren't making progress as fast as we
would want and we're not on track for
where we need to be we are actually
making progress and we can massively
accelerate that if we make the right
decisions now uh do you think the view
that it's too late there's nothing we
can do about it is that you know another
form of climate denialism you say we've
made a 180 from oh we're not doing it at
all to uh it's too late is that just the
new form of climate change denialism I
mean I think I mean I think maybe some
people try to push that message because
they they think that it's it's helpful
for the kind of climate denial message I
mean I think for some people that's not
their motivation I think they genuinely
just feel you know paralyzed and
helpless in the the massive problem so I
don't think it comes from the same place
I think the actions or the outcomes are
very similar right both extremes is not
a problem or it's too late to do
anything about it both lead to the
outcome of inaction right they both lead
us to you know what on one side you
don't take action because it's not a
problem to deal with in the first place
at The Other Extreme you don't take
action because it's pointless and if
we're screwed then what's the point of
doing anything anyway I think the
outcomes of these two extremes can be
the same even if the intent behind them
is not yeah so you say we are making
progress what are examples of that uh I
let's let's try to frontload the pocket
episode with some good news how about
that like like what what is a reason for
an optimistic Viewpoint so I think if
you look at the trajectory we're
currently on on climate change it's not
where we need to be like we're on track
for between 2 and a half to 3 degrees of
warming now that's way above our 1.5
degrees or two degrees
Target but if you were looking at where
we were talking about we were headed a
decade ago you know it was 3 and a half
to four degrees so there like a degree
lower than trajectory we thought we were
on a decade ago now it's where we are is
not acceptable but if we can make that
progress in the decade why can we not
make more progress to pull 2 and a half
degrees down to two degrees so there is
a bit of a good news story there I mean
I think the most dramatic and positive
change for me has been that if you look
a decade ago I was really pessimistic
about where we were because if you
looked at any of the solutions we need
to tackle climate change I mean
fundamentally is we need to move away
from fossil fuels to low carbon energy
energ the problem a decade ago is that
the forms of low carbon energy we had
were way more expensive than fossil
fuels so no one was going to deploy this
at scale because it was way way too
expensive uh over the last 10 years or
so you know the price of Solar has
fallen by 90% the price of winds has
fallen by 70% the price of batteries and
electric vehicles has fallen by about
90% which means that the the low carbon
energy sources we need are now cheaper
than fossil fuels so you don't no longer
have this you know this tradeoff of you
know should we sacrifice the economy to
tackle climate change because no they're
they're now aligned it's actually just
in our shortterm economic interest as
well to go for the low carbon option and
I think for me that's been the most
dramatic change and the most dramatic
progress we've made now it's really
about building the stuff right we've
pulled the prices down now it's about
building the stuff out as quickly as we
can I what I think is interesting about
the answer and you hear that a lot from
uh uh you know folks who are really
following what's happening with the
climate that the price of renewable or
non-fossil fuel energy has gone down so
much that's hugely good news what I
think is interesting about that is it it
really is relying on you know the the
market on capitalism right the price is
low and therefore the good thing is
going to happen uh I guess what I'm
curious about is what is our ability to
do things that the market does not
demand you know for instance if I look
at Transportation here in the US let let
me just give you a p pessimistic case or
or a pessimistic example um you know a
huge amount of our emissions come from
Transportation um and a huge of that is
because of you know single occupancy
Passenger cars people driving two and
four in these giant pieces of metal um
and you know if we had for instance uh
you know massively expanded public
transportation in the United States uh
High-Speed Rail uh passenger rail uh you
know um uh Subways Etc even just
increased buses we could massively
reduce emissions but instead we're
putting all of our change into electric
vehicles which are a marginal
Improvement we're changing the engine of
the car right uh and we're we're pushing
the emissions to the power plant but
that'll that'll be an improvement
however even that has stalled uh in the
last year because uh a the government
has not built a massive series of uh
electric vehicle charges everywhere um
but B you know the car industry is kind
of like ah sure looks like consumers
love the Giant Gas guzzling SUVs that's
what they prefer to buy
and who are we to tell them to buy
something different people want to buy
giant people don't even want small
electric cars when they're buying
electric cars they're buying [ __ ]
huge ones that like take massively more
energy to move around massively more
energy to build Etc and so it it you
know reducing the price and and uh
hoping all right if we just make the
slope go in the right direction all the
water will run the right way and we'll
be moving in the right direction uh
that's great but it also see there we
have to have an ability to do things
that are that are counter to what is
cheap and available right and and do we
have the ability to do that I know
that's a big question to to land on you
early in the podcast but it's it's what
you made me think of no it's no it's and
I I largely agree with you I think
there's a couple of points there I think
I disagree that an electric car is just
like a marginal Improvement on a a
petrol or diesel one I mean even a big
electric car if you look at I mean
what's what there's always a debate of
is an electric car actually better on
carbon than a petrol or diesel I think
what true there is that the
manufacturing of the car emits more
carbon right because it takes more
energy to build the battery than you
would have in a petrol or diesel car but
once you start driving it the you you
pay off the carbon debt very quickly so
in the UK for example it pays off within
two years for the average driver and
then from then on uh the carbon
emissions of the car are much lower so
you're talking about like a two up to
two for reduction and as and that's
great but I do just want to toss in that
almost everyone know in the United
States buys a new car every 3 years um
so if you're paying it back in two years
or at least they're on a lease where
they renew it every 3 years so there
there's that still still that consumer
Behavior problem but keep please keep
going I I think on that but I think the
I I'm fre years seems very very short um
I mean I think most people in the UK at
least buy secondhand cars I mean the key
point is that the if they're buying a
new car their their car they're selling
will go to someone else that will be
might be replacing a petrol or diesel
car so I think the system level it will
be better if you look at the emissions
of an electric car you know you're
talking about around a two reduction in
emissions and actually that will get
better over time right countries are
decarbonizing the electricity grid so
that you know by hopefully by 2035 for
example actually the running emissions
of your electric car might be zero
because the US has decarbonized its
electricity grid but I take your point
that I think you know just leaving this
for the markets to run you know won't
get us there I think what's also really
key is the time scale on which this is
needed I think I think the economics of
the energy transition are now just so
good that you know we would just do this
anyway but we might do this over 60 or
70 years and we don't have 60 or 70
years we need to do this in a much
faster time frame which means you do
need to combine you know take the
advantages of of the free market
economics but also impose policy on top
of that I I think even if you're looking
at the really dramatic declines in the
prices of solar for example over the
last 10 or 15 years they were initially
pushed by policy right some countries
very early on you know set up R&D set up
you know um schemes to do this at a very
high cost and that has been like the
first you know push that that that we
needed in order to get these emissions
out so you think you do need this
combination of of of policy to to to put
you know accelerate these time scales
and you can also take advantage of the
free market economics of it as well I I
really appreciate you pushing back on my
rant about cars with the data that you
have and that was what I was hoping you
would do uh because you know I think you
sort of F I found a little bit of my own
built-in pessimism and I and I loved the
way that you spoke to it uh do you often
get a lot of push back when you are
spreading these messages is there a way
in which you know the people that you're
talking to myself included
sometimes seem like we almost want to be
pessimistic about this topic like we
have a maybe a built-in cynicism about
it a little bit I think what I sometimes
find is that um for every solution we
come up with there's a yes but there's
always a counter of like why that
solution won't work or why that solution
is not good and I think that's very
healthy like I think if we want to find
good Solutions we need to be highly
critical of them right we need to work
out what is a good solution what's
effective what's not effective so we're
putting our priorities and money and
investment in the right places so I
think we really need this this kind of
critical lens to these Solutions I think
what I think for me of what's really
critical in this energy transition and
and tackling climate change is that I
think we're always hunting for the
absolute perfect solution right we're
looking for the solution that has no
land juice no minerals emits zero carbon
you know there's zero negative impacts
whatsoever and I think the reality is
those like those Solutions just don't
exist um what we're looking for and we
need to do this quickly we need to move
away from fossil fuels quickly so what
we're looking for are solutions that are
orders of magnitude better than fossil
fuels and we're having them we have them
and we're developing them and we need to
work on the downsides of those and make
sure we're not creating more damage by
the solutions that we're we're bringing
in I think if we are to wait for the
absolute perfect solution to come along
we'll just maintain our the states qu
right we'll just keep burning fossil
fuels and we won't be willing to move to
anything else I think we need to get a
bit of the balance there where we
acknowledge the down siiz to some of
these other Technologies or or other
Alternatives but we try to make the most
of them and we go for this transition
anyway I think that's a really good
point and it's something I think about a
lot is uh when we are trying to change
the world for the better not letting the
perfect be the enemy of the good but
while at the same time maintaining a
little bit of skepticism and criticality
you know because there are also folks
who will sell a solution as being better
than it is when we could be asking for a
little bit more and that's why look I'm
a transportation wonk I care about that
a lot and in my view if we're rethinking
especially the US's transportation
system if we only change the engines
that are in the vehicles that's a missed
opportunity because there's a much
bigger win to be had there's a better
Society to be built and we shouldn't
expect we shouldn't accept hey there's a
lot of people who want to sell us a
bunch of fancy new cars you know um and
if we do more we will have an even
better outcome um but at the same time
I'm not one of those people who's like
ah it's expens you know it's cost a lot
of carbon to build the batteries so [ __ ]
it right like I don't think there's
there's a medium to be found there right
I don't think everyone should go out and
buy a brand new electric car every three
years I think that's excessive but I do
think hey if you can get a used electric
car and you know you've driven your
previous car into the ground and it's
time to up like go ahead Etc right
there's there is that uh there is that
Medium um
I'm very curious though you talk about
how we need to find new forms of energy
that are many or orders of magnitude
better than fossil fuels there are some
who would say well what if instead of uh
finding a great new for form of energy
what if we cut back what if we just
didn't waste so much what if we didn't
use so much what if we didn't insist on
you know uh so much growth Etc this is
sort of the the degrowth uh movement
there's a lot of folks who have that
sort of perspective what if rather than
more we had less and I'm curious uh what
you think about that point of view I
mean I think I think there is some room
for that I think where I'm skeptical is
I think trying to convince people to do
that is very very difficult and I you
know I think we we would we will
struggle with that type of message I
mean to come back to the policy Point
earlier of course there are things that
you could do to like put a cap on what
we would consider very excessive
consumption right if if if massive SUVs
or a problem okay tax really big SUVs um
if if really frequent flying is is is a
challenge then then then set attacks on
really frequent flying I think I think
you need to be quite careful with those
policies that you don't get lots of push
back you may get pushback if you were to
put High tax on you know the first
flight that someone takes in a given
year you might be able to to do it at
much higher levels of consumption you
know someone's fifth Flight of the year
you know you start to put high taxes on
I'm a I'm a stand up comedian I fly I
take maybe 40 flights a year that was
that last year I I easily am on the
highest level of frein flyer uh loyalty
bonuses um because it's what I do for a
living and you know what I think I would
be okay being taxed on that because I'm
doing it to make money that's how I make
a living and it's something like if if
I'm using the system that much uh I
would be happy if I knew that you know
some amount of money that I was spending
was going towards you know ameliorating
the the the climate Harms of the flying
but you're right I cannot just say hey
what if I cut back in flying a little
bit because it's literally how I make a
living um and I think a lot of folks are
in the same situation it's very
difficult to ask people hey what if you
just cut back what if we all just cut
back and have smaller lives where we're
less prosperous having less fun enjoying
life less that's just sort of not a
great uh pitch to people uh for for how
to solve a problem yeah I don't think
it's a a great pitch and I think if
that's going to be our message I don't
think we'll get very far very quickly
I mean I'm not against reductions and in
what we might call you know excess
consumption I think there are potential
ways to do that I think I think what
would be difficult is like how do you
set how do we agree on what a level of
what excessive is right what excessive
is to you is not the same as what
excesses excessive is to me I think
there is another key part of this which
is that if we want to reduce energy
consumption a really good way to do that
is just to decarbonize I think we can
talk about Behavior change and that's
fine but I think we're also
underestimating how much we can reduce
energy use just by getting rid of fossil
fuels and bi electrifying our Energy
Systems so if you look at you know if
you blow up like a diagram of the US
Energy System today from like the fossil
fuels that are burned and where that
actually goes towards providing people
what we call Energy Services so that's
like uh heating your home or lighting
your home or you know the wheels turning
in your car
the majority of that energy is wasted
along the way and that's because when
you burn fossil fuels most of it goes to
waste heat it doesn't actually go
towards you know actually giving you the
power that you need right which means
that if you were to take fossil fuels
out of the system you would get rid of a
lot of the energy use without taking
anything away from the Energy Services
or the final consumption so your
behaviors could stay exactly the same if
you wanted to but you would need much
much less energy in the system and that
just comes from getting rid of fossil
fuels and then electrifying stuff like
transport for example so if you take
your your your gasoline car um for every
dollar of gasoline you put in it only 20
cents actually goes towards turning the
wheels and moving you the other 80 cents
is just wasted whereas an electric car
is almost the opposite so every dollar
of electricity you put in only 20 cents
is wasted and around 80 goes towards
turning the wheels so actually to drive
the same distance an electric car of the
same size you might need three to four
times less energy so your behavior
hasn't changed but you've actually man
massively reduced your energy
consumption so I mean we also
underestimate our ability to reduce
energy use just by doing the
decarbonization bit and then you can
talk about individual Behavior change as
a as a way to also supplement that okay
you're really smacking down my argument
again about uh electric cars being a
marginal Improvement the it's still
marginal but it's a very large margin I
I absolutely grant you that um and I I
agree it's really important to look at
where the actual waste is if we're
talking about flying you know rather
than you know me flying around to to
make a living we could look at for
instance private jets or that kind of
thing we could look at where the largest
uh waste is maybe you know certain
celebrities don't need to take a
15-minute flight from one airport to
another they could take a goddamn cap
you know uh Etc you know I got to
confess I have always been a sucker for
Japanese treats I love going down a
little Tokyo heading to a convenience
store and grabbing all those brightly
colored fun packaged boxes off of the
Shelf but you know what I don't get the
chance to go down there as often as I
would like to and that is why I am so
thrilled that bxu a Japanese snack
subscription box chose to sponsor this
episode what's gotten me so excited
about bxu is that these aren't just your
run-of-the-mill grocery store finds each
box comes packed with 20 unique snacks
that you can only find in Japan itself
plus they throw in a handy guide filled
with info about each snack and about
Japanese culture and let me tell you
something you are going to need that
guide because this box comes with a lot
of snacks I just got this one today
direct from Baku and look at all of
these things we got uh some sort of
seaweed snack here we've got a
buttercream cookie we've got uh Dolce I
don't I'm gon to have to read the guide
to figure out what this one is it looks
like some sort of sponge cake oh my gosh
this one is I think it's some kind of
maybe fried banana chip let's try it out
and see is is that what it
is nope it's not
banana maybe it's a cassava potato chip
I should have read the guide ah here
they are iur gako Smoky chips potato
chips made with rice flour providing a
lighter texture and satisfying crunch oh
my gosh this is so much fun you got to
get one of these for themselves and get
this for the month of March bxu has a
limited edition cherry blossom box and
12- month subscribers get a free kimono
style robe and get this while you're
wearing your new Duds learning
fascinating things about your tasty
snacks you can also rest assured that
you have helped to support small family
run businesses in Japan because bxu
works with 200 plus small makers to get
their snacks delivered straight to your
door so if all of that sounds good if
you want a big box of delicious snacks
like this for yourself use the code
factually for $15 off your first order
at box.com that's code factually for $15
off your first order on box.com okay I I
want to talk about some of the other
crises that you mention I just want to
ask you one more question on this first
um about the price going down because
there's also a phenomenon when things
get more efficient and the price goes
down we do tend to use more of them I
think about you know uh LED lights right
which are massively more efficient than
every other form of light ever uh made
uh but the result is that people are
using and businesses especially are
using a lot more LED lights because hey
guess what we can now have 10 times the
lights for the same cost or whatever so
why not leave them running all the time
because they're just LEDs uh that sort
of effect uh you know is that at all an
issue in you know hey the price of
moving the price of heating your home
goes down the price of lighting goes
down the price of all these things go
down does that just mean we'll use more
of them not less I think there's two
angles to this I think one angle is
looking at a large part of the world
where a big constraint is just they
cannot afford energy right people that
don't have much heating or lighting or
air con and actually just a big you know
everyday struggle for them is like how
do I get access to energy and for those
people you know a reduction Energy
prices is a massive benefit right they
might get energy for the first time they
might get you know vital Energy Services
that we have enjoyed for a long time so
I think for them energy low energy
prices is just a benefit and actually we
should be supportive of the fact that
their energy use might increase because
it will Mass a great Point that's a
great point Thank you and then I think I
think when we're talking about for
example people in the US or the UK like
richer countries I think this effect
that you describe is is what we call the
jevans Paradox um whereas the price of
something Falls or as efficiency
improves you use more of it now there
are a range of studies trying to you
know look at how big this you know we
call it the rebound effect how big the
rebound is and most tend to find that
the there is some rebound right so you
you do undo some of the improvements
that you get in efficiency for example
but they rarely rebound more than 100%
right so they might rebound 50% so
rather than getting you know the full
100% of the efficiency gains because you
use more you might only get 50% so it's
not as good as you might initially
expect just from the numbers but it's
often not so much that you use more
energy than you did before so LEDs LEDs
is a good example where people after
getting LEDs you did just use more
lights or you left them on or you might
have you know installed more in your
home but actually energy used for
lighting in the US has still gone down
so that the rebound wasn't 100% but we
did undo some of those gains because we
used more yeah well I and I was thinking
about reading studies about light
pollution that like light pollution has
if you uh uh if you're an astronomer or
someone who cares about bats like you
might not be happy about LEDs because
we're using more but the I'm glad to
hear that the uh the energy use has gone
down I love knowing the name of that the
jervin Paradox I hadn't heard that
before oh jevans yeah jeans Paradox uh
that's really cool um uh this is great I
love that I keep standing up these
Arguments for you and you keep knocking
them down so ay uh you're my favorite
kind of guest you say that climate
change is only one of many types of
environmental uh problem that we have
facing us what are some of the others I
mean think another big one is is air
pollution where um I mean globally
estimates there are a range of estimates
of how many people die prematurely from
air pollution every year but they're all
in the
millions and the the World Health
Organization for example estimates that
around 7 million premature deaths every
year from air pollution um which is a
massive deal um and there's two two
problems of air pollution there one is
um what we call indoor air pollution and
that's people typically on on much lower
incomes where actually the only sources
of energy they have have or like wood or
charcoal and they burn these in their
their home for for heating or cooking
fuels and then they inhale the smoke and
that's really really bad for human
health so they you know have millions of
deaths from that and then we have
millions of deaths from outdoor air
pollution so that's you know stuff from
our cars uh power plants for example
industry and again millions of people
die there prematurely every year from
that source of pollution so for the for
meat like that if you were to quantify
you know deaths from environmental
problems today like and air pollution
would be very much top of the list and
it's something we we we kind of have in
the back of our mind but don't really
think about yeah I mean it's completely
insane that when we look at the toll of
our Energy System it's one that we don't
often keep in mind because it's sort of
like an invisible uh death toll like
again you know Transportation causing
emissions even if you just look at
deaths from our transportation system we
think of car crashes uh people being hit
by buses or whatever we don't think
about the number of people who are dying
of respiratory illnesses that they got
because they live 800 feet from a
freeway as many people do here in Los
Angeles where I live I mean there's like
some Federal Regulation that says you're
not supposed to build a home within X
number of feet of a freeway and in Los
Angeles something like I don't know a
huge percentage like 40% of homes are in
violation of this because we have
freeways everywhere um there's just so
much air pollution and so people are
dying left and right of respiratory
diseases but that doesn't hit the news
right it doesn't say Hey you know uh
5-year-old child with asthma killed or
or you know uh person dies at 65 when
they would have died at 90 because of
air pollution uh in the same way that a
car crash does and yet those deaths are
caused by uh by the same thing yeah
exactly and I think I mean this is
another what we call a an externality of
of burning fossil fuels and and that
works in the same way as climate you
know the CO2 emissions and the damages
from climate change are like an
externality a kind of a cost to society
uh a social cost and environmental cost
that isn't factored into the price of
fossil fuels when you burn them and it's
the same for air pollution it's exactly
the same thing this is a kind of hidden
externality that we just don't really
think about I mean I think the I think
again like I like to highlight that
these problems are solvable problems
they're tractable problems I mean if you
were to look across a range of
especially High income countries we have
actually made progress on reducing air
pollution over the last few decades you
know the Us Clean Air Act has been
really successful in reducing emissions
of these gases the same in the UK we've
seen a really rapid decline um there's
still a you know unacceptable number of
people dying from this but but we can
make progress uh when we put the right
policies in place and we we make these
transitions I guess the key challenge
there is that most people dying from air
pollution today live kind of in
middle-income countries that have
industrialized very very quickly but
they've done that by burning fuels
especially very close to to City centers
so you know Delhi for example Beijing
was one you know if you were to go to
Beijing a decade or so ago really really
heavily polluted over the last you know
decade it's made amazing progress in
reducing air pollution and added you
know years onto the lives of its
citizens so i' like to highlight that
these are you know massive problems but
they are also tractable ones and they
are ones that we can make progress on uh
and what are some of the other
environmental challenges I I love
hearing this I love hearing a problem
and then a solution right after it
I mean I think a big one is is our food
systems I think people massively
underestimate the environmental impacts
of Our Food Systems I mean I think
there's almost no environmental problem
where food isn't either a big player or
you know completely dominates the
impacts I mean it contributes around
between a quarter and a third of
greenhouse gas emissions for climate
change wow you know is the leading
driver of deforestation it's the leading
driver of biodiversity loss it's the the
biggest user of fresh water I mean I
think when we think about fresh water
you know we think about you know taking
a shower or brushing your teeth it's
farming is is the biggest user of water
is the leading driver of water pollution
you know so there's a really long list
of environmental problems where food and
and what we eat and how we produce it
really sits at the center of that yeah
and so how do we solve this because
there are I mean look some people will
some people are watching this or
listening to this going vegan we should
all be vegan right and what a wonderful
world that would be uh and I've eaten
vegan for long periods for many times in
my life and uh yet I do not believe that
we are going to solve this problem by
convincing every single person to go
vegan one by one um in the in the you
know way that a religious protier might
that folks who are doing that are are
doing the Lord's work good on you but I
don't think we're going to solve the
problem that way um and I also think
that you know eating organic eating
local a small scale farm is very nice
for folks who can afford it but you know
we need a system a food system that can
feed you know what seven billion people
at this point 8 billion we're on our way
to eight excuse me thank you I always
forget how many billions because when I
was a kid let me just say one of the one
of the [ __ ] weirdest things in my
entire life is I remember being in high
school and being told there are six
billion people on Earth and then I
remember the day like 10 years later it
was like Hey now it's seven and I was
like how there's a billion more people
than there were when I was just like you
know be when I was like watching DVDs
and you know like taking the bus home
from school like how
did what a massive change and yet
everything looks the same to me when I'm
walking down the street it's bizarre um
and now we're now we have eight so uh we
we've added a quarter as many people or
a third as many people has already
existed when when I was a kid in the
last couple decades we got to feed all
of them so you know how the hell can we
have a food system that feeds these
people people food that they want to eat
without destroying the environment so I
think there's I think there's two big uh
Solutions or things we need to do here I
think the very F the first one is we
just we need to produce food very very
efficiently and by that we need High
crop yields now if you to go back to you
know the 1960s or the 1970s you know the
big crisis at that point and and what
people were talking about was the world
running out of food right they saw this
really rapid um increase in in the
global po population and basically the
conclusion was there's no way that we
will be able to feed everyone and then
you know there was the the population
bomb was the book that came out in 1968
by by Paul AR Erick and that predicted
you know just we're just going to have
so many millions of of people dying from
famine and just wouldn't be able to feed
everyone and that hasn't come true and
that hasn't come true because we had
what we call the Green Revolution where
we just see crop Ys across the world
just Skyrocket you know you're getting
doubling tripling quadruple of crop
yields which means that despite having
you know billions more people the amount
of food we produce per person has still
gone up you know we've we've seen a
masses of increase I think going forward
that's also really key what happens if
you increase crop yields is you
obviously get more food but the key
point is you you grow on less land which
means you need to cut down less forests
you need to you know go into less wild
habitats you can you can use much less
land for farming so that's number one
and then number two is just we just need
to see massive Global dietary change um
the biggest impact by far of Our Food
Systems is is is meat and dairy
consumption and we do need to find a way
of reducing that but I I completely
agree with you that I think the the
message of we just all need to go vegan
tomorrow is just like not going to work
yeah um and actually so how do we I'm
fascinated to hear you say that then
because I I agree um I agree with both
points right and so how do we square
that Circle how do we red and by by the
way in the last couple years there's
been a huge amount of interest in meat
replacement Foods there was like a brief
fad for them in the United States for a
couple years I was buying impossible
burgers and Beyond Burgers uh and now I
never want to eat one of those things
for as long as I live like I I ate so
many impossible burgers that I can like
picture the taste like and it repulses
me at this point um and you know God
willing they come up with a different
conversion that that tastes a little
different and is a little bit more of an
actual replacement but you know
unfortunately that industry turned out
to not uh have the results that it
promised investors and the public so uh
yeah what do we do to reduce meat
consumption if all those things uh we
sort of are agreed might not be the
answer I mean I think the I mean I think
I should say that I think I think food
is way harder to tackle than energy I
think on energy I think people for the
most part they just want you know cheap
energy coming out of the socket right
and if you can provide that for them
they don't really care where it comes
from yeah um for food people really care
about what they eat and it's like such a
strong part of the identity and and
their freedom right try to tell someone
what to eat and they will immediately
push back which is why I think this is a
much harder problem to tackle yeah I
mean I think the I mean I think the
keying there is um trying to sell it to
someone as a All or nothing like you
either eat meat or you don't eat meat is
not going to work right I think we need
to find a way of of red ring meat
consumption or giving people options to
reduce meat consumption and starting
there and then they might progress
towards you know a more and more
plant-based diet over time but I think
you're not going to get that overnight I
mean I think for me I think we will need
to rely on on on solutions that that
produce almost complete mimics of meat
that we're currently eating I guess I'm
probably pretty pessimistic that people
just accept you know we'll just eat
beans and lentil and that'll be fine I
think for most people they basically
want a substitute for meat
which means we need to produce meat
without the animal and there are
Innovations coming through on this the
the problem is that they are currently
too expensive and we haven't scaled them
yet I've read uh I've read accounts of
of the current state of lab grown meat
where they're like sort of making like a
lattice of of uh animal cells like very
painstakingly in a lab and like one on
top of the other and like okay we've
made the perfect artificial steak and it
only costs $100,000 a pound or whatever
uh it it's like encouraging work but
it's not really close to market yet is
that right yeah I mean I think the the
costs have are falling pretty rapidly
still um I mean I think yeah $100,000
would have been you know the price you
know maybe a decade or so ago but
they've Fallen quite fast since then and
I actually think on cost they might be
competitive you know in the next five or
so years really um I think the
scalability will be the problem it's
like how you then take that you know
really fin your created process and
scale that up you know to produce
hundreds of millions of tons of meat I
think that will be the big problem
rather than the economics of it yeah and
we also have the problem with the food
system of people's health I mean as you
say uh since you know the population
bomb was written in the last 50 years
there's been this enormous explosion of
food production which is great sort of
demographically right if you're looking
at okay we produced enough food for all
of these billion people um but if you
look at at least you know the the
dietary health of people in the United
States it is poor um and you have to lay
some of that at the feet of our food
system it's not people need to make
better choices it's people need better
choices in the supermarket the food that
is being rammed down people's throats is
not what it should be uh because of um I
I would say the pressures of capitalism
on these food producers to uh make food
more cheaply and Etc um and so so you
know we have this explosion in the
number of calories we're creating but
they're maybe not the calories that are
best for People's Health um and I could
imagine something similar happening if
if we have our meat substitute like we
we probably need you know some amount of
regulations in place or or somebody
thinking about like let's make sure we
shape this system so that we're not
producing you know we're feeding people
and we're also not feeding them [ __ ]
right yeah no I agree I think the I
think the quality of the meat substit or
you know whatever we replace it with
will be really important I think I think
nut and and to some extent that could be
another lever to to encourage people to
to move away from from particular
products like I think as I was saying I
think the the transition in food is a
much harder sale for people but what
people really care about is their health
so if we can produce products that are
one more environmentally friendly and
also better for People's Health that
could be another lever to encourage
people to make that transition I mean I
mean there are a range of studies
looking at you know the the health
benefits of moving to a more plant-based
diet it doesn't necessarily mean a
completely plant-based diet but a more
plant-based diet and they tend to result
in in slightly better health outcomes
for people and that might not be because
necessarily they're eating less meat but
I think often when people transition to
more plant-based diet they automatically
increase the diversity of foods that
they're eating right like they they
diversify different meals they eat a bit
more veg a bit more fruit a bit more of
various different foods so overall the
quality of their diet might improve and
diversify so I think I think that the
health lens of this is also really
really critical yeah and when I think
you can make the argument to people hey
you're if you eat less meat if you
diversify your diet you're going to be
healthier that is an appealing message
to people uh you know people want to
feel better about what they eat um
and I think if we sort of abandon the
the Monkish Devotion to I'm never never
again shall meet past my lips um
and that's fine for those who want to
make that moral commitment I think
that's a wonderful moral commitment to
make and I support it but if we can
focus on reducing diversifying for
everybody in general we can make huge
huge gains uh without requiring people
to without requiring people to give up
so much if they don't want to is it is
that sort of what it is yeah exactly I
think for a lot of people even that
first step seem would seem overwhelming
you know how on Earth do I eat a vegan
diet like what do I eat um and I
actually think as you gradually as
people are gradually exposed towards you
know eating a bit less meat or
substituting you know one meal you know
a day or or a day a week for a more
plant-based diet they then start to
learn stuff that they can eat and oh I
actually quite like this substitute or I
like this different meal that I've I've
made I then they become more comfortable
with it over time and might be able to
take it further I think the the
overwhelm initially of okay I suddenly
have to eat a completely vegan diet you
know really puts people off so I think
we need to to take people on baby steps
along the way and then they might end up
a vegan die at the end of the road but I
think most people will not jump
immediately to that yeah I mean my own
uh my own thing was like 10 years ago I
read a book by uh The cookbook arth
author Mark bitman called vegan before
six where he he had he's like here's my
diet plan I eat vegan before 6 p.m. and
then I have whatever I want for dinner
and uh I did that for a year or two and
then I just sort of learned oh here's a
bunch of vegan meals I can make myself
and so now I eat vegan quite often not
I'm not a permanent vegan but like you
know more often than not I'm like oh let
me try to have a vegan meal today um and
uh I think getting that sort of muscle
memory into people so that they know how
to do it enables them to make those
choices uh Etc now vegans in the
comments I know you're yelling everyone
should just go vegan it's fine like keep
doing what you're doing but we are
trying to uh get as many people under
the tent as possible and having a little
bit of allowance for where people are
currently at I think helps us do that
right yeah exactly I mean I've had this
dilemma myself so I'm I'm now a vegan
and I was in you know three years or so
ago and I've actually questioned over
the years am I more effective in this
role as a vegan or as someone that's not
a vegan but strongly encourages you know
meat reduction like I sometimes have
this kind of block of if I you know
people find out I'm a vegan you know
they don't take my message seriously or
they think I'm like way too extreme or
you know they can't visualize how they
would get from where they are to where I
am whereas if I was someone that you
know didn't eat meat that often maybe
didn't eat beef but ate some chicken or
fish they might find that more relatable
and therefore they might actually feel
like there was a a shorter Gap between
where they are and where I am I mean in
the end I I I just went vegan anyway but
I have questioned you know what's the
most effective you know communication
strategy there or or where to place
yourself to to reach a a bigger cohort
of people yeah it does it is funny that
if you're talking to a vegan and you're
feeling bad about yourself and then they
reveal I I eat fish sometimes and you're
like oh oh thank God oh okay all right
okay so so there's there's some hope for
me yet you know like it it's just having
having a little bit of flex like makes
people a little bit relieved um so I I
really love that we're making progress
in so many areas um I am curious though
are there any areas where we're putting
a lot of effort into reducing our carbon
emissions that are not so effective um
that you know are things that you know
hey we should direct our our efforts
elsewhere are there any current
initiatives that you are a skeptic about
I mean I think the I think on on climate
change specifically I mean I think the
the issue there is I think there's a lot
of people that are really well
intentioned they want to make a
difference they want to cut their carbon
footprint but they don't have good
information to base that on and they
often misplace their effort H and the
issue there is that they do the stuff
that has a really tiny impact or
sometimes a negative impact and then
they miss the really big stuff um so
when you look for example if you look at
surveys you know asking people you know
what's the best thing you can do for the
environment or the best thing you can do
to cut carbon footprint they mention
stuff like recycling or you know reusing
a plastic bag or turning off the lights
and and these are you know fine to do do
them but they're small in the magnitude
of things and actually they miss the
stuff like adopting a more plant-based
diet or or they even miss stuff like you
know switching to the to electric car so
they they're focusing on the really tiny
stuff and putting effort in there and
then missing the really big stuff and
what I think was really key is if we
were to have a hope of tackling this you
know we're past the stage of the little
stuff right we need to be focusing on
the big stuff so I think that's the
issue that people have is is also often
misplaced effort when there's actually a
list of you know maybe five big things
that really matter and then the rest is
more like a
around yeah well recycling is such a
contentious one because a lot of people
have an awareness that uh you know
recycling at least how it's practiced in
the US is uh in many ways a bit of a PR
attempt by the Plastics industry to you
know distract from the waste that they
caused hey if we put that little
triangle on the thing and say it's
recyclable um then people will think oh
it's not so bad to buy one and it'll
remove the guilt from them and then
we'll shift the burden of being
responsible onto the consumer now I
don't I believe all that is true I know
all that is true I've I've studied it
and done uh content on it myself uh but
that doesn't stop me from throwing all
that [ __ ] the blue bin blue bin because
hey why not as some of it's being
recycled whatever I don't stress out
about it too much but I think that that
breeds a cynicism in people that hey
these solutions that were being
presented are capitalist schemes by
people who are trying to get us to buy
more um and uh I I I don't know I I I
think that is what leads a lot of people
to say oh we're never going to solve
this problem unless we do something
about our economic system overall that
we change its structure um and you know
that we have a rapacious economic system
that is gobbling everything up that
always wants more demands endless growth
uh mines the planet for resources mines
our Labor uh to reduce it to its uh uh
lowest possible cost and is just you
know a fire that's consuming the planet
until it's all gone uh that's a very
apocalyptic view um but I'm curious uh
what you think about you know our our
economic system itself and how it
contributes to the problem or uh if we
can actually solve it under
capitalism I mean I think uh
that was a
lot I I like to give a lot at this point
in the conversation I'm sensing you're a
big fan of
capitalism no I think I think I think
those are all very valid points I mean I
think it's very fair to say that
capitalism has got us into this mess
yeah or at least has played a massive
role in getting us into this mess I
think you can still make the argument
that it can play some role in getting us
out of it now or at least another way
I'd frame it is that to me I'm not sure
we have a choice at this stage of trying
to utilize some of the positives of
capitalism which you know we discussed
earlier the kind of free market
economics of of uh energy costs and
technological change I think that's like
one benefit of this there are obviously
still massive downsides the question is
can you um Garner the the benefits of
the the system but also try to address
and pull down some of the downsides of
the system right um to me that seems
more realistic than deciding we're just
going to rip up the system and build a
new one especially on the time skills
that we're talking about here right
we're talking about tackling this you
know we need to really get moving on I
mean we should have got moving on this
20 years ago but now we really need to
get moving on this and we're talking
about you know decarbonizing or
electricity grids in the UK or the US in
5 to 10 years yeah um and and and I'm
I'm skeptical that we can tear down an
economic system and build a new one on
that time scale maybe if we're talking
about this over 70 years then we might
have a way of you know working on our
economic system first and then deciding
how we tackle our environmental problems
later so I think we in some sense are
stuck in the economic system that we're
in but that doesn't need to accept all
of the all of the aspects of it or just
accept it as the status quo I think
there are things we can do within that
system to to utilize the benefits and
and and try to push down some of the
major downsides of it I agree with you
entirely I I mean I'm a Critic of our
economic system uh and uh I I agree that
capitalism has gotten us into this mess
and I'm a person who uh is constantly
wanting to Envision something better um
however I don't think that uh we can we
have time to wait you know I don't think
we have time to say hey let's let's
figure out the economic system first and
then deal with climate change we can do
both things at once and you know we can
be realists about the world that we live
in and try to make you know the changes
that we need to make in that world under
the system that we're in as we also try
to Envision a better system and and uh
build it uh and you know I do take issue
when people say Ah that's you know as
people are probably going to say in the
comments of this video when we posted on
YouTube Ah capitalism did this we need
to uproot capitalism yes and we also
need to uh
we need to actually solve the problem
that we actually face in the limited
amount of time that we have um and uh it
is not an either or problem it is an and
and and and problem uh so thank you so
much for that yeah I agree and I think I
mean I think the I think the argument is
often well we're just going to take the
current system Energy System for example
that we're in and we're just subbing it
for a different one and and it's just
going to be just as bad and it's going
to be so as extractive as it was before
and again I think this comes a little
bit back to these Kind of Perfect
Solutions uh this hunt for Perfect
Solutions I mean I think we need to be
re realistic that you know this is not
about maintaining the status quo but
like this the the rebuilding our Energy
System is you know the biggest
ultimately one of the biggest challenges
we're going to face and we're just going
to see really dramatic changes here so I
don't think we should underestimate how
you know big this transformation is that
we're asking even in the food system
right we're trying to completely
transform our food system completely
transform our Energy System our industry
you know Transport Systems so these are
really kind of revolutionary changes I
think we should underplay that but on
the kind of extractive component I think
you know we're trying to move away from
a a fossil fuel system which is just
take take take right when you extract
fossil fuels you burn them they're done
right you need to extract more and you
do this every every year and and there
we're talking about you know extracting
15 billion tons of fossil fuels every
year Now we move to low carbon energy
for example we will also need to extract
minerals that's completely true and we
need to be conscious of the
environmental impact of that but what's
key is that we are talking about you
know orders of magnitude less minerals
you know we're talking about tens to
hundreds of millions of tons compared to
15 billion tons of fossil fuels every
single year I think the key point of
this transition as well is that you
don't need to extract this year after
year after year right you can start to
then recycle those minerals you know at
the end of a solar panel's life for a
win turbine and put that back into the
system so we will need a ramp up period
initially because we just need to build
lots of new stuff but we'll hopefully
reach a position where a lot of that can
be recycled and we get to more of a you
know circular economy approach that that
people discuss rather than just an
extractive take take take one yeah and
what I love about that is that you're
depicting us as taking a step towards
the world we want if you're someone
listening to or watching this podcast
who says capitalism is is extractive and
I that's something I hate about it well
you're describing an energy system that
is far less extractive right um that is
pulling less out of the earth
ultimately uh especially if we're able
to uh as you say you know reuse some of
the minerals that we extract and so that
is addressing part of the problem that
you are trying to address we're not
we're not like ripping out the whole
thing and replacing it in a day but we
are taking a step towards the world that
we want um which I think is really
important you know we talk about many
issues on this show whether we're
talking about um you know the criminal
justice system right some folks are
prison abolitionists police
abolitionists I'm like hey hey I don't
disagree with that uh W with the world
that you're envisioning let's take steps
in the meantime to you know build forms
of justice that are you know uh
alternatives to policing that so we can
show people how it works and reduce our
Reliance on a day-to-day basis rather
than just focusing on the far off
Horizon you know we also need to take
steps towards that world today under the
system that we live in and that's what
you're talking about doing um which is
uh why I love it so much um are are you
ever though like uh you know is there
ever a a pessimist bone in your body
about it like do you do you ever uh are
are there you know is there a world that
you know you you see us possibly heading
towards that you're trying to steer us
away from because sometimes I I do know
that the optimists point of view
especially for uh a climate activist it
can be a little bit of a strategic
choice right we need to be optimistic in
order to do these things and therefore
it makes sense to take a strategy of
optimism um and you know not be public
about the fear that's in the back of
your head of like oh what if we don't do
these things right um so you know are
you still powered by fear to some degree
or are you really like confident hey all
of these great things are are going to
happen if we all keep pulling oh no
definitely Ely like the fear is still
there like I still lose a lot of sleep
over climate change I guess I just try
to
balance that fear um and in some sense
anxiety with with also with the optimism
that there is something we can do about
it like I'm very clear always in my
messaging and also in the book that you
know the changes I describe in the book
are not inevitable in any way right I
don't know if we will do it I can't
force us to do it but they are possible
and I think there's a massive
opportunity there and I think I think
what we need at the moment is a positive
vision of the world we could live in
yeah um as almost as a North star I
think there's a lot of the environmental
messaging is almost built around damage
limitation and it's you know you know
the world will inevitably worse in the
future we just decide how bad it's going
to be um and I think actually we need a
bit more of a positive vision of no
actually the future can be better it it
will not inevitably better but there is
something better that we can work
towards how do we go from where we are
now to where we would want to be so
that's what I try to do with my
messaging is try to present you know a
bit more of a a positive vision of where
we're trying to go to but also make
clear that you know none of this
inevitable and you know if we stay on
our current path you know I'm very
scared about what the future will look
like because we're not on a good one but
I just have some level of optimism that
we can get our act together and bend
that curve closer to know the
temperature changes that we want and and
and are achievable so uh give me a
little bit of that positive version of
the or vision of the future right like
if like paint us a little bit of a
picture of you know here I am like I
said I I uh you know 30 years ago I was
watching those cartoons right uh Captain
Planet and whatnot today I'm in my 40s
I'm like hey we didn't do as much as as
I feel like we should have done um but
you know what is the world that I could
live in when I'm
if we uh do all the things that you say
are possible so if we you know get our
act together and Tackle this you know we
won't I don't think we'll limit you know
warming to 1.5° I think you know that's
you know a very PL loable goal but I
think you know we have kind of left it
too late to achieve that but I think the
key point there is you know 1.5 degrees
is not a cliff right like we are we need
to fight for temperature ranges above
that because with each incremental rise
in temperature increase risks so I think
2 degrees is still within our grasp if
we really get our act together so we
could limit warming to below 2° we will
see you know increased impacts there you
know but there are things that we can do
to limit those a lot of those impacts so
we're live in a world where hopefully
the majority of the world have access to
energy they have higher standards of
living than they do today um energy is
very cheap um we don't have these you
know massive energy price shocks you
know that we have in a fossil fuel
system because you know Putin invades uh
Ukraine um like we've seen in the last
few years so we have more stable and low
energy prices um people have access to
the Energy Services they need you know
we have much more livable cities that
aren't you know completely governed by
cars on the road um there are you know
better communities where we can interact
you know we have cycle Lanes public
transport you know people are walking
people can sit Outdoors they can D out
um we have clean air to breathe so
people aren't dying from air pollution
you know we don't kill you know more
than 70 billion animals every year for
food but we still have you know really
tasty nutritious diets we've got zero
deforestation because we've brought that
to an end um and we have you know these
amazing wild Landscapes coming back and
and wild animals coming back that is a
beautiful Vision um and you feel very
confident that that we can get there you
at least feel optimistic that we can get
there yeah these these goals are
completely achievable whether we do them
is is up to us and I mean as you know a
very large Collective level but but
they're there for us and I think the key
Point uh and what I try to communicate
in in my messaging is that this
transition is not a sacrifice I think
often this environmental stuff is posed
as a sacrifice it's you know oh we'll
just have to cut back or we'll just have
to sacrifice this in order to preserve
the future and fine that actually that
messaging is fine if that's the correct
you know notation the correct idea and
correct message there and maybe we
should just sacrifice but we actually
don't need to sacrifice because the
changes we're making our opportunities
so we have opportunities in the short
term and it also leads to good benefits
over the long term and I think we need
to reframe our our messaging here away
from you know sacrifice towards one of
of opportunity and abundance yeah that
it it's the class scarcity mentality
versus abundance mentality that uh we we
do not have to uh have worse lives we do
not have to live in a worse World in
order to prevent these outcomes actually
everything will be better we will all
have uh more more healthy more vibrant
more prosperous lives if we were to make
this transition I also I love the name
of your book so much not the end of the
world because um it is such a deep
philosophical thing that people think
the world is ending and like it's it's
not possible for it to end right like
you are unless you personally die right
you are going to wake up in a world that
exists and it is going to be better or
worse you know and you are going to have
to live in it and you have some amount
of control we all have some amount of
amount of control over what that world
is based on our actions today and no
matter how bad things are we have the
opportunity to do something that is
going to make the world that we're going
to wake up in tomorrow a little bit
better a little bit worse um and uh so
and when I think about it though way it
makes me realize this mentality that
like the world is ending is nothing but
a copout it's it's uh it's false and all
it does is absolve you fictionally of
that uh of that power it it takes power
away from you to say that about the
world yeah I think that's that extreme
again if you you know tell yourself that
the world is doomed and it's too late to
tackle these problems and it is the end
of the world then yeah your reaction to
that is well if it's over then you know
why why why should I take action anyway
you know won't make a difference um
maybe we should just you know enjoy the
remaining of Our Lives that we have left
because nothing we do now is going to
change things and that again I think
that's a cop out because that's just not
the reality and and that type of
approach and that you know uh messaging
is not going to get us to where we need
to be I think we need to reframe or disc
questions around this of yes these are
very serious problems for some people
these actually are existential problems
like people will die people are dying
from air pollution people are dying from
climate change and people will die from
climate change so for some people this
is really an existential threat but we
have the capacity to reduce those risks
to reduce those dangers and actually not
just you know have this damage
limitation uh Vision but also a better
vision of of actually improving the
world going forward rather than than
just trying to stop some of the
damage yeah and I mean once you start
thinking about that way it makes you
realize how big of an opportunity you
have because it sort of you go from
thinking ah what can I do to fight
climate change or to fight these
problems to thinking oh everything that
I do can be a solution you know like EV
like whether it's eating vegan or it's
you know getting the electric car or
it's doing policy work or whatever like
every single thing that you do is a move
in the right direction um if you choose
for it to be um and and it's can be
massively empowering to think about it
that way yeah exactly and I think the as
I was saying earlier I think I mean
these are you know massive transitions
that we're doing and they touch on
basically every sector um which means
that you know regardless of you know
what you're working in or where you're
working or or what you're doing you know
these issues are touching you and and
and and you can have a positive imp in
that like I think we we often think of
what you can do in environmentalism as
just you know how do I reduce my carbon
footprint and and and that's fine and
and I give recommendation of how people
can do that most effectively but I think
we should also be more ambitious about
that of you know my contribution is not
just going to be how do I limit my
footprint as much as possible I actually
want to offset that and more by the
positive impacts that I make whether
it's you know communicating to others
whether it's someone you know you know
working in politics working in
engineering or Finance or you know we
all play a role in trying to shift all
of these systems into a more sustainable
path and actually you know regardless of
what you do you're probably hting on
those every day yes and this is why I'm
so against people putting themselves in
a position of powerlessness and a lot of
times when I'm arguing with what I think
people are going to are going to write
in the comments it's me arguing with
that people say oh we can't do anything
because capitalism no you can do a hell
of a lot uh in and it's not only your
responsibility it's your opportunity to
do so and if you don't take it you are
you're you're putting yourself in a
position you're you're declaring that
you have no power when the opposite is
true um I so appreciate you coming on
today to dispel some of my lingering
pessimism and tell me why I'm wrong
about it I absolutely loved it uh the
name of the book is not the end of the
world people can of course get it at our
special Bookshop bod.com books um but
where can people find you online Hannah
and uh how can they get involved in this
fight yeah so I maybe one of the best
places is uh I work for a project called
our world in data and that's a website
and we have data and research on not
just climate change and environment but
what we frame is the world's largest
problem so you can go on there and look
at all the data to try to understand
what's going on in the world it's an
incredible resource it's it's really an
amazing site people should go check it
out our world in data yeah I have have a
a substack called sustainability by
numbers where I try to understand these
problems on on environment and climate
through numbers so not about like gut
feelings or you know intuitions or
anecdotes but actually looking at the
data on on electric vehicles for example
um because I was I was really going
based on gut feelings and anecdotes and
so you bringing numbers was an important
corrective to that I love that
sustainability and numbers yeah and I
think how people can can contribute to
this like in so many ways I think there
is the you know reducing your personal
carbon footprint bit which is important
but I think much more wider than that I
think the key one is just you know how
do you contribute you know from your
career for example a lot of people
especially younger people are deciding
you know what should I do with my life
if you're interested in this area there
are so many areas that you can get
involved and make a positive difference
whether that's in engineering whether
that's becoming an electricity to you
know massively enhance the Grid or
install heat pumps whether it's
spreading the message through ART I mean
there's so many ways that you can do
this in a much more positive way and
then obviously also really key to that
is trying to to influence politics and
and as we discussed markets I think you
also have an impact on the market by the
stuff that you buy when you're buying an
EV you're signaling you know we're done
with petrol and diesel cars yeah the
world is moving towards electric cars I
think we can also have a impact
politically and on our our Market
systems thank you so much for coming on
Hannah I can't thank you enough it's
been a wonderful conversation thanks
very much thank you well thank you once
again to Dr Hannah Richie for coming on
the show if you want to pick up a copy
of her book once again head to factually
pod.com books that's factually pod.com
books every purchase there supports not
just this show but your local bookstore
as well if you would like to support
this show directly and I hope you do
head to patreon.com adamc Conover five
bucks a month gets you every episode of
the show ad free we also have a
community book club coming up soon we
reading Caitlyn Do's book Smoke Gets In
Your Eyes and chatting with Caitlyn over
zoom on a private Zoom link hope you'll
join us for that awesome event for 15
bucks a month I will read your name on
this very podcast our most recent $15 a
month contributors are mask when you can
protect your community thank you so much
masin you can protect your community for
slipping that message in there I approve
of it
aa193 and Jasmine Andrade thank you so
much to all of them if you'd like to
join them head to patreon.com adamc
Conover if you'd like to come see me on
the road doing standup comedy head to
Adam con.net for all my tickets and tour
dates heading to Indianapolis Indiana la
la Hoya California San Jose California
would love to see you out there adamc
con.net for tickets and tour dates I'd
like to thank my producers Tony Wilson
and Sam rman everybody here at headgum
for making the show possible thank you
so much for listening and we'll see you
next time on factually that was a
headgum
podcast
Loading video analysis...